IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v91y2026icp841-856.html

Do outsourced machinery services improve land rental market performance in rural China? New evidence on transaction quantity and quality

Author

Listed:
  • Su, Min
  • Fan, Pengfei
  • Feng, Shuyi

Abstract

Existing literature on the effects of outsourced machinery services (OMS) on land rental markets has focused primarily on transaction quantity, rarely considering transaction quality or analyzing both dimensions simultaneously. This study addresses this gap by using national panel data from China and a two-way fixed-effects model to examine the impact of OMS and the underlying mechanisms. The results show that OMS significantly increases transaction quantity and improves transaction quality, as reflected in greater contractual stability, stronger market orientation, and higher levels of formality. Mechanism analysis indicates that OMS increases transaction quantity by expanding rented-in land area through a cost-saving channel. It also enhances transaction quality through an asset-specificity channel—leading to more clearly defined rental periods and lower rental prices—and through a reconfigured social-trust channel, which promotes the use of written contracts. The effects are strongest in major grain-producing regions. These findings provide policy-relevant insights for promoting the coordinated development of land rental and agricultural machinery service markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Su, Min & Fan, Pengfei & Feng, Shuyi, 2026. "Do outsourced machinery services improve land rental market performance in rural China? New evidence on transaction quantity and quality," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 841-856.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:91:y:2026:i:c:p:841-856
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2026.03.045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S031359262600144X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2026.03.045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:91:y:2026:i:c:p:841-856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.