IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v55y2018icp151-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utility performance in supplying water to informal settlements: A case study from Malawi

Author

Listed:
  • Banda, E.M.
  • Mwale, F.D.

Abstract

Water utility performance in most African countries remains poor. Informal settlements pose enormous challenges to utilities, stemming from socio-economic factors. However, their impact on utility performance has not been carefully considered. Focusing on non-revenue water (NRW), revenue collection efficiency, and repair costs, this study assessed a utility's performance in Malawi in selected informal settlements. Results suggest that the presence of informal settlements does not necessarily amplify and may actually reduce NRW. Collection efficiency on average is high. Repair costs are extremely high. Utilities may benefit from continued investments in informal settlements with innovations to water supply infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Banda, E.M. & Mwale, F.D., 2018. "Utility performance in supplying water to informal settlements: A case study from Malawi," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 151-157.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:55:y:2018:i:c:p:151-157
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2018.09.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178717302242
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2018.09.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mugabi, Josses & Kayaga, Sam & Njiru, Cyrus, 2007. "Strategic planning for water utilities in developing countries," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, March.
    2. Hulya Dagdeviren & Simon A. Robertson, 2009. "Access to Water in the Slums of the Developing World," Working Papers 57, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    3. Kayaga, Sam & Franceys, Richard, 2007. "Costs of urban utility water connections: Excessive burden to the poor," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 270-277, December.
    4. Keener, Sarah & Luengo, Manuel & Banerjee, Sudeshna, 2010. "Provision of water to the poor in Africa : experience with water standposts and the informal water sector," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5387, The World Bank.
    5. Kayaga, Sam & Calvert, John & Sansom, Kevin, 2003. "Paying for water services: effects of household characteristics," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 123-132, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Şişman, Eyüp & Kızılöz, Burak, 2020. "Trend-risk model for predicting non-revenue water: An application in Turkey," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jimenez-Redal, Ruben & Parker, Alison & Jeffrey, Paul, 2014. "Factors influencing the uptake of household water connections in peri-urban Maputo, Mozambique," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 22-27.
    2. Mohammed Aminu Sualihu & M. Arifur Rahman & Zakiya Tofik-Abu, 2017. "The Payment Behavior of Water Utility Customers in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana: An Empirical Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, September.
    3. Francisco Gonzalez-Gomez & Jorge Guardiola & Teresa Garcia-Muñoz, 2009. "The link between water access and subjective well-being: some methods and proposals," ThE Papers 09/02, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    4. Adeoti, O. & Fati, B.O., 2020. "Barriers to extending piped water distribution networks: The case of Ekiti State, Nigeria," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Dennis Wichelns, 2013. "Enhancing the performance of water prices and tariff structures in achieving socially desirable outcomes," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 310-326, September.
    6. Jedidiah S. Snyder & Graeme Prentice-Mott & Charles Boera & Alex Mwaki & Kelly T. Alexander & Matthew C. Freeman, 2020. "The Sustainability and Scalability of Private Sector Sanitation Delivery in Urban Informal Settlement Schools: A Mixed Methods Follow Up of a Randomized Trial in Nairobi, Kenya," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Rabeya Sultana Leya & Sujit Kumar Bala & Imran Hossain Newton & Md. Arif Chowdhury & Shamim Mahabubul Haque, 2022. "Water security assessment of a peri-urban area: a study in Singair Upazila of Manikganj district of Bangladesh," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 14106-14129, December.
    8. Eric Nazindigouba KERE & Johanna CHOUMERT & Amandine Loyal LARÉ-DONDARINI, 2014. "The impact of water and sanitation access on housing values: The case of Dapaong, Togo," Working Papers 201403, CERDI.
    9. Wodon, Quentin & Banerjee, Sudeshna & Diallo, Amadou Bassirou & Foster, Vivien, 2009. "Is low coverage of modern infrastructure services in African cities due to lack of demand or lack of supply ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4881, The World Bank.
    10. Ryan Schweitzer & C. Pezon & Abdul Pinjari & Catarina Fonseca & James R . Mihelcic, 2013. "Household expenditure on water service Financial and economic expenditures of rural and peri-urban households across socio-economic classes and seasons in Burkina Faso," Post-Print hal-02012158, HAL.
    11. Garrone, Paola & Grilli, Luca & Marzano, Riccardo, 2019. "Price elasticity of water demand considering scarcity and attitudes," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Hailu, Degol & Osorio, Rafael Guerreiro & Tsukada, Raquel, 2012. "Privatization and Renationalization: What Went Wrong in Bolivia’s Water Sector?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(12), pages 2564-2577.
    13. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:9:y:2008:i:20:p:1-10 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Maria A. García-Valiñas & Roberto Martínez-Francisco & González-Gómez, 2010. "Water affordability: alternativem measurement and explanatory Factors in Andalusia," Centre for Water Economics, Environment and Policy Papers 1014, Centre for Water Economics, Environment and Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    15. Massarutto, Antonio & Roder, G. & Troiano, S., 2022. "Better safe than sorry? Stated preferences and the precautionary principle for securing drinking water quality in an Italian district," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    16. Harrison Mutikanga & Saroj Sharma & Kalanithy Vairavamoorthy, 2011. "Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: A Strategic Planning Tool for Water Loss Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(14), pages 3947-3969, November.
    17. Zorica Srdjevic & Ratko Bajcetic & Bojan Srdjevic, 2012. "Identifying the Criteria Set for Multicriteria Decision Making Based on SWOT/PESTLE Analysis: A Case Study of Reconstructing A Water Intake Structure," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(12), pages 3379-3393, September.
    18. Schouten, M. & Halim, R.D., 2010. "Resolving strategy paradoxes of water loss reduction: A synthesis in Jakarta," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1322-1330.
    19. Elena Bardasi & Quentin Wodon, 2008. "Who pays the most for water? Alternative providers and service costs in Niger," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 9(20), pages 1-10.
    20. Maria A. García‐Valiñas & Roberto Martínez‐Espiñeira & Francisco González‐Gómez, 2010. "Economics of Water Reform in the Murray-Darling Basin," Centre for Water Economics, Environment and Policy Papers 1005, Centre for Water Economics, Environment and Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    21. Lee Pugalis & Bob Giddings & Kelechi Anyigor, 2014. "Reappraising the World Bank responses to rapid urbanisation: Slum improvements in Nigeria," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(4-5), pages 519-540, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:55:y:2018:i:c:p:151-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.