IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v92y2024ics0301420724003647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does green investment respond differently to decomposed oil shocks?

Author

Listed:
  • Duan, Kun
  • Tan, Jinkui
  • Ren, Xiaohang
  • Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad

Abstract

This study investigates the asymmetric impact of oil price shocks on green investment by using a Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) framework. Oil price shocks are decomposed from perspectives of supply, demand, and risk of the oil market, and the green investment is proxied by the Dow Jones Sustainability World Index. The asymmetry of the oil price impact is examined from different sources of the shocks and the condition when the specific shock level is positive or negative. Our findings indicate that impacts of oil shocks on green investment are different depending on sources of the shocks and time horizons. Specifically, supply shocks exhibit no obvious asymmetric effects. Positive and negative changes of the demand shock depict asymmetric impacts on green investment, while such an asymmetry gradually evolves to be symmetric in the long-run. In contrast, the impact of risk shocks is symmetric in the short-run while being evolved to be asymmetric in the long-run. Moreover, the linkage of oil shocks with green investment is shown to be altered by unanticipated events such as the financial crisis or the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting the uncertainty embedded in the two is somewhat similar.

Suggested Citation

  • Duan, Kun & Tan, Jinkui & Ren, Xiaohang & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2024. "How does green investment respond differently to decomposed oil shocks?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724003647
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724003647
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724003647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.