IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v88y2024ics0301420723011017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hard coal production in Poland in the aspect of climate and energy policy of the European Union and the war in Ukraine. Investment case study

Author

Listed:
  • Bijańska, Jolanta
  • Wodarski, Krzysztof

Abstract

The adoption by European Union (EU) member states of a long-term vision to move toward climate neutrality implies abandoning hard coal production, temporarily using natural gas and transitioning to renewable energy and nuclear power. Along these lines, most EU countries have ceased coal production, but coal consumption has declined at a much slower rate, resulting in increased dependence on coal imports, including from Russia. In 2021, as much as 51 million tons of coal went from this country to EU countries. In 2022, in the wake of Russia's aggression against Ukraine, resulting in an embargo on Russian coal, some EU countries, mainly Poland, began to consider extending the operation of coal mines and making investments in maintaining or increasing capacity, to make up for the shortage of coal mainly for residential customers. Deciding to make such an investment is difficult, among other things because of the accompanying business risks, which the mine's management is responsible for exceeding. The publication presents a developed model for assessing the business risk of investment in maintaining or increasing coal production, the use of which makes it possible to obtain information to support rational decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Bijańska, Jolanta & Wodarski, Krzysztof, 2024. "Hard coal production in Poland in the aspect of climate and energy policy of the European Union and the war in Ukraine. Investment case study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:88:y:2024:i:c:s0301420723011017
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420723011017
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104390?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:88:y:2024:i:c:s0301420723011017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.