IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v72y2021ics0301420721000994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does civil society matter for natural resource governance? A comparative analysis of multi-stakeholder participation and EITI validation outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Wilson, Christopher
  • Claussen, Christoffer
  • Valverde, Pablo

Abstract

The EITI leverages a multi-stakeholder model in which government, civil society and business collaborate to improve the quality of resource governance in participating countries. Like other multi-stakeholder initiatives that aim to improve public governance through information disclosure and civic participation, this model relies on an assumption that civil society participation in the process improves EITI outcomes. This assumption is tested through comparative analysis of data from 63 EITI Validation processes. The results indicate that civil society participation has a small but statistically significant correlation with EITI outcomes related to the rules and comprehensiveness of information disclosure, quality assurance processes, public debate, and most clearly in regard to the reforms that follow from the recommendations in Validations. There are, however, important differences between civil society's contributions to different outcomes, and whether or not civil society participation takes place within the multi-stakeholder group (MSG). Notably, restrictions on MSG participation are found to have a strong moderating effect on civil society's contributions to EITI outcomes, but restrictions on national civic space do not. The results suggest that the discourse surrounding the EITI has been overly simplistic in how it has considered the role of civil society and civic space, and would benefit from more precise consideration of different types of civil society engagement with national EITI processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilson, Christopher & Claussen, Christoffer & Valverde, Pablo, 2021. "Does civil society matter for natural resource governance? A comparative analysis of multi-stakeholder participation and EITI validation outcomes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:72:y:2021:i:c:s0301420721000994
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420721000994
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vijge, Marjanneke J. & Metcalfe, Robin & Wallbott, Linda & Oberlack, Christoph, 2019. "Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 200-209.
    2. Fox, Jonathan A, 2007. "The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability," Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, Working Paper Series qt8c25c3z4, Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, UC Santa Cruz.
    3. Mojtaba Vaismoradi & Hannele Turunen & Terese Bondas, 2013. "Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 398-405, September.
    4. Bãœthe, Tim, 2002. "Taking Temporality Seriously: Modeling History and the Use of Narratives as Evidence," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 96(3), pages 481-493, September.
    5. Marjanneke J. Vijge, 2018. "The (Dis)empowering Effects of Transparency Beyond Information Disclosure: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 18(1), pages 13-32, February.
    6. Kasekende, Elizabeth & Abuka, Charles & Sarr, Mare, 2016. "Extractive industries and corruption: Investigating the effectiveness of EITI as a scrutiny mechanism," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 117-128.
    7. Lujala, Päivi, 2018. "An analysis of the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative implementation process," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 358-381.
    8. Paul F. Steinberg, 2003. "Understanding Policy Change in Developing Countries: The Spheres of Influence Framework," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 3(1), pages 11-32, February.
    9. Fenton Villar, Paul, 2020. "The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and trust in politicians," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Jennifer M. Brinkerhoff & Derick W. Brinkerhoff & Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2011. "Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 31(1), pages 50-63, February.
    11. Mena, Sébastien & Palazzo, Guido, 2012. "Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(3), pages 527-556, July.
    12. Rustad, Siri Aas & Le Billon, Philippe & Lujala, Päivi, 2017. "Has the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative been a success? Identifying and evaluating EITI goals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 151-162.
    13. Nelson Oppong, 2018. "Negotiating transparency: NGOs and contentious politics of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Ghana," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 58-71, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vijge, Marjanneke J. & Metcalfe, Robin & Wallbott, Linda & Oberlack, Christoph, 2019. "Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 200-209.
    2. Brunnschweiler, Christa & Edjekumhene, Ishmael & Lujala, Päivi, 2021. "Does information matter? Transparency and demand for accountability in Ghana's natural resource revenue management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    3. López-Cazar, Ibeth & Papyrakis, Elissaios & Pellegrini, Lorenzo, 2021. "The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and corruption in Latin America: Evidence from Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Peru, and Trinidad and Tobago," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Vincent Géronimi & Claire Mainguy, 2020. "Exploitation minière et développement : des effets toujours controversés. Introduction," Mondes en développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 7-29.
    5. Lujala, Päivi, 2018. "An analysis of the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative implementation process," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 358-381.
    6. Mawejje, Joseph, 2019. "Natural resources governance and tax revenue mobilization in sub saharan Africa: The role of EITI," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 176-183.
    7. Fenton Villar, Paul, 2020. "The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and trust in politicians," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Harouna Kinda, 2021. "Does transparency pay ? The impact of EITI on tax revenues in resource-rich developing countries," Working Papers hal-03208955, HAL.
    9. Rustad, Siri Aas & Le Billon, Philippe & Lujala, Päivi, 2017. "Has the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative been a success? Identifying and evaluating EITI goals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 151-162.
    10. Päivi Lujala & Christa Brunnschweiler & Ishmael Edjekumhene, 2020. "Transparent for Whom? Dissemination of Information on Ghana’s Petroleum and Mining Revenue Management," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(12), pages 2135-2153, December.
    11. Anica Zeyen & Markus Beckmann & Stella Wolters, 2016. "Actor and Institutional Dynamics in the Development of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 341-360, May.
    12. Sosson Tadadjeu & Henri Njangang & Paul Ningaye & Mohammadou Nourou, 2022. "Oil dependence and access to water and sanitation in African countries: Does the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative matter?," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 34(1), pages 54-67, March.
    13. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Walter, Götz & Van de Graaf, Thijs & Andrews, Nathan, 2016. "Energy Governance, Transnational Rules, and the Resource Curse: Exploring the Effectiveness of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 179-192.
    14. Christa Brunnschweiler & Ishmael Edjekumhene & Paivi Lujala & Sabrina Scherzer, 2022. "You need to have this information: Using videos to increase demand for accountability on public revenue management," University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Paper Series 2022-10, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    15. Bertrand Laporte & Celine de Quatrebarbes & Yannick Bouterige, 2022. "Tax design and rent sharing in mining sector: Evidence from African gold‐producing countries," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(6), pages 1176-1196, August.
    16. Engebretsen, Rebecca Elisabeth Husebye & Brugger, Fritz, 2021. "Divergent corporates: Explaining mining companies divergent performance in health impact assessments," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    17. Hevina S. Dashwood & Uwafiokun Idemudia & Bill Buenar Puplampu & Kernaghan Webb, 2022. "The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and local institutions in Ghana’s mining communities: Challenges in understanding barriers to accountability," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(5), September.
    18. Kinda, Harouna & Thiombiano, Noël, 2024. "Does transparency matter? Evaluating the Impacts of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) on Deforestation in Resource-rich Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    19. Furstenberg, Saipira & Moldalieva, Janyl, 2022. "Critical reflection on the extractive industries transparency initiative in Kyrgyzstan," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    20. Emmanuel Songsore & Michael Buzzelli, 2016. "Ontario’s Experience of Wind Energy Development as Seen through the Lens of Human Health and Environmental Justice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:72:y:2021:i:c:s0301420721000994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.