IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v13y2018i1p58-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negotiating transparency: NGOs and contentious politics of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Nelson Oppong

Abstract

Transparency has been upheld by the dominant Zeitgeist of the twenty-first century as an all-purpose recipe for addressing the ills associated with resource-led developmental transformation. However, little attention has been paid to the bargains and contestations accompanying its institutionalisation in resource-rich countries. To gain a fuller understanding of how transparency interventions interact with the deeper vectors of power and politics embedded in resource governance, this article examines the dynamics of NGO participation in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), an international auditing and multi-stakeholder oversight initiative, adopted by Ghana in 2003. By recasting the analytic problem around the optic of NGO contestation and representation, the article offers a more nuanced engagement with the material politics of negotiability, contestation, and representation that drive EITI compliance, non-compliance, and de-compliance. Drawing from an overall comparative political economy approach and a heuristic model highlighting the intricate dynamics of transparency, the overriding argument ranks the understated contestations within the NGO community around the EITI and the disparity between its platforms and the representational processes of democratic accountability among the most formidable threats to the EITI's noble ambition of securing optimum resource-led transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelson Oppong, 2018. "Negotiating transparency: NGOs and contentious politics of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Ghana," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 58-71, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:58-71
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2017.1394483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2017.1394483
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2017.1394483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Bracking, 2009. "Hiding Conflict over Industry Returns: A Stakeholder Analysis of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 9109, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tuokuu, Francis Xavier Dery & Gruber, James S. & Idemudia, Uwafiokun & Kayira, Jean, 2018. "Challenges and opportunities of environmental policy implementation: Empirical evidence from Ghana's gold mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 435-445.
    2. Wilson, Christopher & Claussen, Christoffer & Valverde, Pablo, 2021. "Does civil society matter for natural resource governance? A comparative analysis of multi-stakeholder participation and EITI validation outcomes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roy Maconachie & Radhika Srinivasan & Nicholas Menzies, 2015. "Responding to the Challenge of Fragility and Security in West Africa," World Bank Publications - Reports 22511, The World Bank Group.
    2. Anthony Bebbington & Elisa Arond & Juan Luis Dammert, 2016. "Scalar politics and transnational governance innovations: A political settlements lens on the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in the Andes," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-066-16, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    3. Bürgi Bonanomi, Elisabeth & Elsig, Manfred & Espa, Ilaria, 2015. "The Commodity Sector and Related Governance Challenges from a Sustainable Development Perspective: The Example of Switzerland Current Research Gaps," Papers 865, World Trade Institute.
    4. Cyril Obi, 2010. "Oil as the ‘curse’ of conflict in Africa: peering through the smoke and mirrors," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(126), pages 483-495, December.
    5. Kinda, Harouna & Thiombiano, Noël, 2024. "Does transparency matter? Evaluating the Impacts of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) on Deforestation in Resource-rich Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Liliane C. Mouan, 2010. "Exploring the potential benefits of Asian participation in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative: The case of China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(6), pages 367-376, September.
    7. Dumitru MIRON & Mihaela PREDA, 2009. "Stakeholder Analysis of the Romanian Energy Sector," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(5), pages 877-892, December.
    8. Schuler Douglas A., 2012. "A club theory approach to voluntary social programs: Multinational companies and the extractive industries transparency initiative," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:58-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.