IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v69y2020ics0301420720308679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic mineral resource competition: Strategies of the dominator and nondominator

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu, Zhiyun
  • Dong, Zhiliang
  • Zhang, Yanxing
  • Suo, Guibin
  • Liu, Sen

Abstract

In the global situation of increasingly severe resource competition, to study the strategies of the dominator and the nondominator, this paper builds two different levels of networks based on the theory of two-mode complex networks: an overall network and a classification network. Through the analysis of the topological structure of the overall network, the “dominator” of international trade and the minerals with the highest comprehensive importance to the countries involved in global trade are identified, and the dominant mode of the dominator and the classification of the competition mineral are studied by analyzing the classification network. The results show the following: (1) The United States, China, and the EU were the dominators in the international trade of 24 strategic minerals from 2009 to 2018, and their dominant modes differed for different types of minerals. (2) Petroleum and coal are the minerals with the highest comprehensive importance for the countries involved in global trade, and each of the 24 minerals has a different degree of supply risk. (3) Ten minerals, namely, tungsten (Tu), uranium (Ur), phosphorus (Ap), coal (Coal), copper (Cu), zirconium (Zr), aluminum (Al), lithium carbonate (LiC), oil (Oil), and rare earth (RE), are competitive minerals; geographically, the resource competition in western and southern Africa, southern South America, western Asia, Australia and Russia is the most intense. Finally, the study provides suggestions on how countries with different resource endowments can reduce trade risks and maintain a dynamic balance of the “order” of peaceful development among the dominators.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu, Zhiyun & Dong, Zhiliang & Zhang, Yanxing & Suo, Guibin & Liu, Sen, 2020. "Strategic mineral resource competition: Strategies of the dominator and nondominator," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:69:y:2020:i:c:s0301420720308679
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420720308679
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101835?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geng, Jiang-Bo & Ji, Qiang & Fan, Ying, 2014. "A dynamic analysis on global natural gas trade network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 23-33.
    2. Guan, Qing & An, Haizhong, 2017. "The exploration on the trade preferences of cooperation partners in four energy commodities’ international trade: Crude oil, coal, natural gas and photovoltaic," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 154-163.
    3. Hao, Xiaoqing & An, Haizhong & Qi, Hai & Gao, Xiangyun, 2016. "Evolution of the exergy flow network embodied in the global fossil energy trade: Based on complex network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1515-1522.
    4. Xibo Wang & Jianping Ge & Wendong Wei & Hanshi Li & Chen Wu & Ge Zhu, 2016. "Spatial Dynamics of the Communities and the Role of Major Countries in the International Rare Earths Trade: A Complex Network Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Liu, sen & Dong, Zhiliang, 2019. "Who will trade bauxite with whom? Finding potential links through link prediction," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Kristen Hopewell, 2018. "Recalcitrant spoiler? Contesting dominant accounts of India’s role in global trade governance," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 577-593, March.
    7. Li, Huajiao & Fang, Wei & An, Haizhong & Yan, LiLi, 2014. "The shareholding similarity of the shareholders of the worldwide listed energy companies based on a two-mode primitive network and a one-mode derivative holding-based network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 415(C), pages 525-532.
    8. An, Haizhong & Zhong, Weiqiong & Chen, Yurong & Li, Huajiao & Gao, Xiangyun, 2014. "Features and evolution of international crude oil trade relationships: A trading-based network analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 254-259.
    9. Alexandre Vidmer & An Zeng & Mat'uv{s} Medo & Yi-Cheng Zhang, 2015. "Prediction in complex systems: the case of the international trade network," Papers 1511.05404, arXiv.org.
    10. Ge, Jianping & Wang, Xibo & Guan, Qing & Li, Weiheng & Zhu, He & Yao, Min, 2016. "World rare earths trade network: Patterns, relations and role characteristics," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 119-130.
    11. J., Pablo Muñoz & Hubacek, Klaus, 2008. "Material implication of Chile's economic growth: Combining material flow accounting (MFA) and structural decomposition analysis (SDA)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 136-144, March.
    12. Kong, Rui & Xue, Fangfang & Wang, Jing & Zhai, Haiyan & Zhao, Lina, 2017. "Research on Mineral Resources and Environment of Salt Lakes in Qinghai Province based on System Dynamics Theory," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 19-28.
    13. Zhang, Hai-Ying & Ji, Qiang & Fan, Ying, 2014. "Competition, transmission and pattern evolution: A network analysis of global oil trade," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 312-322.
    14. Faure-Schuyer, Aur�lie & Egenhofer, Christian & Elkerbout, Milan, 2018. "Value Chains based on Mineral Raw Materials: Challenges for European Policy and Industry," CEPS Papers 13468, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    15. Li, Huajiao & Fang, Wei & An, Haizhong & Gao, Xiangyun & Yan, Lili, 2016. "Holding-based network of nations based on listed energy companies: An empirical study on two-mode affiliation network of two sets of actors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 449(C), pages 224-232.
    16. John D. Nystuen & Michael F. Dacey, 1961. "A Graph Theory Interpretation Of Nodal Regions," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(1), pages 29-42, January.
    17. Dong, Di & An, Haizhong & Huang, Shupei, 2017. "The transfer of embodied carbon in copper international trade: An industry chain perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 173-180.
    18. Jochen Wirtz & Christopher Tang, 2016. "Uber: Competing as Market Leader in the US versus Being a Distant Second in China," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: SERVICES MARKETING People Technology Strategy, chapter 19, pages 626-632, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    19. An, Qier & Wang, Lang & Qu, Debin & Zhang, Hujun, 2018. "Dependency network of international oil trade before and after oil price drop," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 1021-1033.
    20. Vidmer, Alexandre & Zeng, An & Medo, Matúš & Zhang, Yi-Cheng, 2015. "Prediction in complex systems: The case of the international trade network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 188-199.
    21. Jasiński, Dominik & Cinelli, Marco & Dias, Luis C. & Meredith, James & Kirwan, Kerry, 2018. "Assessing supply risks for non-fossil mineral resources via multi-criteria decision analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 150-158.
    22. Dahya, Jay & Dimitrov, Orlin & McConnell, John J., 2008. "Dominant shareholders, corporate boards, and corporate value: A cross-country analysis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 73-100, January.
    23. Tokito, Shohei & Kagawa, Shigemi & Nansai, Keisuke, 2016. "Understanding international trade network complexity of platinum: The case of Japan," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 415-421.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Jinyu & Luo, Qian & Sun, Xin & Zhang, Zitao & Dong, Xuesong, 2023. "The impact of renewable energy consumption on lithium trade patterns: An industrial chain perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    2. Yu, Zhen & Wang, Yilan & Ma, Xiaoqian & Shuai, Chuanmin & Zhao, Yujia, 2023. "How critical mineral supply security affects China NEVs industry? Based on a prediction for chromium and cobalt in 2030," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    3. Ren, Shuai & Li, Huajiao & Wang, Yanli & Guo, Chen & Feng, Sida & Wang, Xingxing, 2021. "Comparative study of the China and U.S. import trade structure based on the global chromium ore trade network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Zhu, Xuehong & Ding, Qian & Chen, Jinyu, 2022. "How does critical mineral trade pattern affect renewable energy development? The mediating role of renewable energy technological progress," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Kang, Xinyu & Wang, Minxi & Wang, Taixin & Luo, Fanjie & Lin, Jing & Li, Xin, 2022. "Trade trends and competition intensity of international copper flow based on complex network: From the perspective of industry chain," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Zhu, Mingxue & Zhou, Xuanru & Zhang, Hua & Wang, Lu & Sun, Haoyu, 2023. "International trade evolution and competition prediction of boron ore: Based on complex network and link prediction," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Yu, Yu & Ma, Daipeng & Zhu, Weiwei, 2023. "Resilience assessment of international cobalt trade network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Zhang, Ling & Wang, Liang & Wang, Miaomiao & Yuan, Zengwei, 2024. "Multilevel analysis of copper resource reallocation in the anthroposphere through international trade," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Donglin Ren & Liang Liu & Xiujuan Gong & Pan Jiang & Shu Liu & Yirui Yang & Ruifeng Jin, 2022. "Effect Evaluation of Ecological Compensation for Strategic Mineral Resources Exploitation Based on VIKOR-AISM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Yu, Yu & Ma, Daipeng & Qian, Yingmiao, 2023. "A resilience measure for the international nickel trade network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    11. Abbas, Qamar & Hongxing, Yao & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Ramzan, Muhammad & Fatima, Sumbal, 2024. "Metallic minerals production and environmental sustainability in China: Insights using ARDL bounds testing and wavelet coherence approaches," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Zuo, Zhili & Cheng, Jinhua & Guo, Haixiang & Li, Yonglin, 2021. "Knowledge mapping of research on strategic mineral resource security: A visual analysis using CiteSpace," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    13. Li, George Yunxiong & Ascani, Andrea & Iammarino, Simona, 2024. "The material basis of modern technologies. A case study on rare metals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    14. Yi, Jiahui & Dai, Sheng & Cheng, Jinhua & Wu, Qiaosheng & Liu, Kailei, 2021. "Production quota policy in China: Implications for sustainable supply capacity of critical minerals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    15. Ma, Yu & Wang, Minxi & Li, Xin, 2022. "Analysis of the characteristics and stability of the global complex nickel ore trade network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hou, Wenyu & Liu, Huifang & Wang, Hui & Wu, Fengyang, 2018. "Structure and patterns of the international rare earths trade: A complex network analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 133-142.
    2. Cappelli, Federica & Carnazza, Giovanni & Vellucci, Pierluigi, 2023. "Crude oil, international trade and political stability: Do network relations matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Giovanni Carnazza & Pierluigi Vellucci, 2022. "Network analysis and Eurozone trade imbalances," Papers 2209.09837, arXiv.org.
    4. Xuanru Zhou & Hua Zhang & Shuxian Zheng & Wanli Xing & Pei Zhao & Haiying Li, 2022. "The Crude Oil International Trade Competition Networks: Evolution Trends and Estimating Potential Competition Links," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Li, Xiaotong & Zhang, Hua & Zhou, Xuanru & Zhong, Weiqiong, 2022. "Research on the evolution of the global import and export competition network of chromium resources from the perspective of the whole industrial chain," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Zhang, Hongwei & Wang, Ying & Yang, Cai & Guo, Yaoqi, 2021. "The impact of country risk on energy trade patterns based on complex network and panel regression analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    7. Xi, Xian & Zhou, Jinsheng & Gao, Xiangyun & Liu, Donghui & Zheng, Huiling & Sun, Qingru, 2019. "Impact of changes in crude oil trade network patterns on national economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Xibo Wang & Jianping Ge & Wendong Wei & Hanshi Li & Chen Wu & Ge Zhu, 2016. "Spatial Dynamics of the Communities and the Role of Major Countries in the International Rare Earths Trade: A Complex Network Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Wang, Wenya & Fan, L.W. & Zhou, P., 2022. "Evolution of global fossil fuel trade dependencies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    10. Li, Huajiao & An, Haizhong & Fang, Wei & Wang, Yue & Zhong, Weiqiong & Yan, Lili, 2017. "Global energy investment structure from the energy stock market perspective based on a Heterogeneous Complex Network Model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 648-657.
    11. Kitamura, Toshihiko & Managi, Shunsuke, 2017. "Driving force and resistance: Network feature in oil trade," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 361-375.
    12. Zhang, Hongwei & Wang, Xinyi & Tang, Jing & Guo, Yaoqi, 2022. "The impact of international rare earth trade competition on global value chain upgrading from the industrial chain perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    13. Xia, Qifan & Du, Debin & Cao, Wanpeng & Li, Xiya, 2023. "Who is the core? Reveal the heterogeneity of global rare earth trade structure from the perspective of industrial chain," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    14. Feng, Sida & Li, Huajiao & Qi, Yabin & Guan, Qing & Wen, Shaobo, 2017. "Who will build new trade relations? Finding potential relations in international liquefied natural gas trade," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1226-1238.
    15. Sun, Qingru & Gao, Xiangyun & Zhong, Weiqiong & Liu, Nairong, 2017. "The stability of the international oil trade network from short-term and long-term perspectives," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 482(C), pages 345-356.
    16. Xiaoyu Niu & Wei Chen & Nyuying Wang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Topological Evolution of the Global Crude Oil Trade Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Kang, Xinyu & Wang, Minxi & Wang, Taixin & Luo, Fanjie & Lin, Jing & Li, Xin, 2022. "Trade trends and competition intensity of international copper flow based on complex network: From the perspective of industry chain," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Chen, Wei & Niu, Xiaoyu & Ke, Wenqian & Yu, Zhaoyuan, 2023. "Investigating the energy trade networks in the Belt and Road regions: Structures and evolution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    19. Zhong, Weiqiong & An, Haizhong & Fang, Wei & Gao, Xiangyun & Dong, Di, 2016. "Features and evolution of international fossil fuel trade network based on value of emergy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 868-877.
    20. Huang, Jianbai & Ding, Qian & Wang, Ying & Hong, Huojun & Zhang, Hongwei, 2021. "The evolution and influencing factors of international tungsten competition from the industrial chain perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:69:y:2020:i:c:s0301420720308679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.