IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v133y2025ics0305048324002342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking outcomes to costs: A unified measure to advance value-based healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Borzée, Joke
  • Cardoen, Brecht
  • Cherchye, Laurens
  • De Rock, Bram
  • Roodhooft, Filip

Abstract

Guided by the Value-Based Healthcare framework, the healthcare sector increasingly aims to maximize patient value by improving the quality of care while containing costs, which requires aligning the interests of patients, health providers and payers. This study addresses the need for advanced patient value measurement techniques to navigate this complex balance by introducing a four-step framework that combines Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing. The framework starts by defining Decision-Making Units and specifying the treatment pathway (Step 1), followed by selecting the relevant inputs (i.e., costs) and outputs (i.e., health outcomes) (Step 2). Next, the DEA model is tailored to fit the specific medical context (Step 3), ultimately translating the value equation into unified, individual value scores that rank patients by perceived value (Step 4). Unlike traditional healthcare evaluations, the multiple health outcomes are connected to granular costing information without relying on monetary values or subjective weighting. Using real-life data from a case study focused on psoriasis, we demonstrate that value assessments significantly differ when considering a comprehensive set of health outcomes, rather than relying on a single primary outcome or treating costs and outcomes separately. These holistic value scores are used to pinpoint inefficiencies on an individual level, analyse patterns of health improvements through cluster analysis, and assess the impact of contextual variables on value creation using econometric analysis. Our results revealed the complex interplay between outcomes and costs by identifying factors like the presence of comorbidities, which had no direct influence on costs or outcomes, as overall value driver. In summary, this research proposes an intuitive metric for value benchmarks across time, health providers and treatments, ultimately contributing to the effective delivery of personalized and value-based healthcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Borzée, Joke & Cardoen, Brecht & Cherchye, Laurens & De Rock, Bram & Roodhooft, Filip, 2025. "Linking outcomes to costs: A unified measure to advance value-based healthcare," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:133:y:2025:i:c:s0305048324002342
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2024.103270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324002342
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2024.103270?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clara Dismuke & Vania Sena, 2001. "Is there a Trade-Off between Quality and Productivity? The Case of Diagnostic Technologies in Portugal," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 107(1), pages 101-116, October.
    2. Johannesson, Magnus & Jonsson, Bengt, 1991. "Economic evaluation in health care: Is there a role for cost-benefit analysis?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Rajiv D. Banker & Ram Natarajan, 2008. "Evaluating Contextual Variables Affecting Productivity Using Data Envelopment Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 48-58, February.
    4. Jacobs, Karel & Roman, Erin & Lambert, Jo & Moke, Lieven & Scheys, Lennart & Kesteloot, Katrien & Roodhooft, Filip & Cardoen, Brecht, 2022. "Variability drivers of treatment costs in hospitals: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 75-86.
    5. Cook, Wade D. & Tone, Kaoru & Zhu, Joe, 2014. "Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-4.
    6. Sebastian Kohl & Jan Schoenfelder & Andreas Fügener & Jens O. Brunner, 2019. "The use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in healthcare with a focus on hospitals," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 245-286, June.
    7. James S. Dyer & James E. Smith, 2021. "Innovations in the Science and Practice of Decision Analysis: The Role of Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5364-5378, September.
    8. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    9. James E. Smith & Ralph L. Keeney, 2005. "Your Money or Your Life: A Prescriptive Model for Health, Safety, and Consumption Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(9), pages 1309-1325, September.
    10. Dyson, R. G. & Allen, R. & Camanho, A. S. & Podinovski, V. V. & Sarrico, C. S. & Shale, E. A., 2001. "Pitfalls and protocols in DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 245-259, July.
    11. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    12. Francisco Javier Santos Arteaga & Debora Di Caprio & David Cucchiari & Josep M Campistol & Federico Oppenheimer & Fritz Diekmann & Ignacio Revuelta, 2021. "Modeling patients as decision making units: evaluating the efficiency of kidney transplantation through data envelopment analysis," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 55-71, March.
    13. Laurens Cherchye, 2001. "Using data envelopment analysis to assess macroeconomic policy performance," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 407-416.
    14. Jamasb, T. & Pollitt, M., 2000. "Benchmarking and regulation: international electricity experience," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 107-130, September.
    15. Halkos, George & Petrou, Kleoniki Natalia, 2019. "Treating undesirable outputs in DEA: A critical review," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 97-104.
    16. Misiunas, Nicholas & Oztekin, Asil & Chen, Yao & Chandra, Kavitha, 2016. "DEANN: A healthcare analytic methodology of data envelopment analysis and artificial neural networks for the prediction of organ recipient functional status," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 46-54.
    17. Rajiv D. Banker & Richard C. Morey, 1986. "The Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(12), pages 1613-1627, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valentin Zelenyuk, 2019. "Data Envelopment Analysis and Business Analytics: The Big Data Challenges and Some Solutions," CEPA Working Papers Series WP072019, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    2. Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2020. "Aggregation of inputs and outputs prior to Data Envelopment Analysis under big data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 172-187.
    3. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2015. "Efficiency of the banking system in Vietnam under financial liberalization," OSF Preprints qsf6d, Center for Open Science.
    4. Holý, Vladimír, 2024. "Ranking-based second stage in data envelopment analysis: An application to research efficiency in higher education," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 12(C).
    5. Amar Oukil & Slim Zekri, 2021. "Investigating farming efficiency through a two stage analytical approach: Application to the agricultural sector in Northern Oman," Papers 2104.10943, arXiv.org.
    6. Minh-Hieu Le & Wen-Min Lu, 2024. "An integrated multiple objective decision making approach for exploring the competitiveness of pharmaceutical multinational enterprises," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(1), pages 401-426, October.
    7. Dyckhoff, Harald & Souren, Rainer, 2022. "Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis and production theory for performance evaluation: Framework and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 795-816.
    8. Matthias Staessens & Pieter Jan Kerstens & Johan Bruneel & Laurens Cherchye, 2019. "Data Envelopment Analysis and Social Enterprises: Analysing Performance, Strategic Orientation and Mission Drift," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 325-341, October.
    9. Christopher F. Parmeter & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2019. "Combining the Virtues of Stochastic Frontier and Data Envelopment Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1628-1658, November.
    10. Bozec, Richard & Dia, Mohamed, 2007. "Board structure and firm technical efficiency: Evidence from Canadian state-owned enterprises," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1734-1750, March.
    11. Esteve, Miriam & Aparicio, Juan & Rodriguez-Sala, Jesus J. & Zhu, Joe, 2023. "Random Forests and the measurement of super-efficiency in the context of Free Disposal Hull," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 729-744.
    12. Papaioannou, Grammatoula & Podinovski, Victor V., 2023. "Production technologies with ratio inputs and outputs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 1164-1178.
    13. Ruiz, José L. & Segura, José V. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2015. "Benchmarking and target setting with expert preferences: An application to the evaluation of educational performance of Spanish universities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 594-605.
    14. Cordero Ferrera, Jose Manuel & Alonso Morán, Edurne & Nuño Solís, Roberto & Orueta, Juan F. & Souto Arce, Regina, 2013. "Efficiency assessment of primary care providers: A conditional nonparametric approach," MPRA Paper 51926, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Fang, Hong & Wu, Junjie & Zeng, Catherine, 2009. "Comparative study on efficiency performance of listed coal mining companies in China and the US," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5140-5148, December.
    16. Edirisinghe, N.C.P. & Zhang, X., 2010. "Input/output selection in DEA under expert information, with application to financial markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1669-1678, December.
    17. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Poh, K.L., 2008. "A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 1-18, August.
    18. An, Qingxian & Tao, Xiangyang & Chen, Xiaohong, 2023. "Nested frontier-based best practice regulation under asymmetric information in a principal–agent framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 269-285.
    19. Syrjanen, Mikko J., 2004. "Non-discretionary and discretionary factors and scale in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(1), pages 20-33, October.
    20. Costa, Marcelo Azevedo & da Silva, Aline Veronese & Mineti, Leandro Brioschi, 2025. "Geographical Bayesian second stage analysis for operating efficiency of Brazilian electricity distribution system operators," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:133:y:2025:i:c:s0305048324002342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.