IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v70y2017icp263-286.html

Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods

Author

Listed:
  • Sivarajah, Uthayasankar
  • Kamal, Muhammad Mustafa
  • Irani, Zahir
  • Weerakkody, Vishanth

Abstract

Big Data (BD), with their potential to ascertain valued insights for enhanced decision-making process, have recently attracted substantial interest from both academics and practitioners. Big Data Analytics (BDA) is increasingly becoming a trending practice that many organizations are adopting with the purpose of constructing valuable information from BD. The analytics process, including the deployment and use of BDA tools, is seen by organizations as a tool to improve operational efficiency though it has strategic potential, drive new revenue streams and gain competitive advantages over business rivals. However, there are different types of analytic applications to consider. Therefore, prior to hasty use and buying costly BD tools, there is a need for organizations to first understand the BDA landscape. Given the significant nature of the BD and BDA, this paper presents a state-of-the-art review that presents a holistic view of the BD challenges and BDA methods theorized/proposed/employed by organizations to help others understand this landscape with the objective of making robust investment decisions. In doing so, systematically analysing and synthesizing the extant research published on BD and BDA area. More specifically, the authors seek to answer the following two principal questions: Q1 – What are the different types of BD challenges theorized/proposed/confronted by organizations? and Q2 – What are the different types of BDA methods theorized/proposed/employed to overcome BD challenges?. This systematic literature review (SLR) is carried out through observing and understanding the past trends and extant patterns/themes in the BDA research area, evaluating contributions, summarizing knowledge, thereby identifying limitations, implications and potential further research avenues to support the academic community in exploring research themes/patterns. Thus, to trace the implementation of BD strategies, a profiling method is employed to analyze articles (published in English-speaking peer-reviewed journals between 1996 and 2015) extracted from the Scopus database. The analysis presented in this paper has identified relevant BD research studies that have contributed both conceptually and empirically to the expansion and accrual of intellectual wealth to the BDA in technology and organizational resource management discipline.

Suggested Citation

  • Sivarajah, Uthayasankar & Kamal, Muhammad Mustafa & Irani, Zahir & Weerakkody, Vishanth, 2017. "Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 263-286.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:70:y:2017:i:c:p:263-286
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829631630488X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Gang & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ngai, Eric W.T. & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2016. "Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 98-110.
    2. Ritu Agarwal & Vasant Dhar, 2014. "Editorial —Big Data, Data Science, and Analytics: The Opportunity and Challenge for IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 443-448, September.
    3. Yingxu Wang & Victor J. Wiebe, 2014. "Big Data Analytics on the Characteristic Equilibrium of Collective Opinions in Social Networks," International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 8(3), pages 29-44, July.
    4. Alnoor Bhimani & Leslie Willcocks, 2014. "Digitisation, 'Big Data' and the transformation of accounting information," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 469-490, August.
    5. Irani, Zahir & Ghoneim, Ahmad & Love, Peter E.D., 2006. "Evaluating cost taxonomies for information systems management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(3), pages 1103-1122, September.
    6. Alexandru Adrian TOLE, 2013. "Big Data Challenges," Database Systems Journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(3), pages 31-40, October.
    7. Z Irani, 2010. "Investment evaluation within project management: an information systems perspective," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(6), pages 917-928, June.
    8. Robert J. David & Shin‐Kap Han, 2004. "A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 39-58, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Sébastien Lacam & David Salvetat, 2021. "Big data and Smart data: two interdependent and synergistic digital policies within a virtuous data exploitation loop," Post-Print hal-03434863, HAL.
    2. Jingmei Gao & Zahid Sarwar, 2024. "How do firms create business value and dynamic capabilities by leveraging big data analytics management capability?," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 283-304, September.
    3. Claudio Vitari & Elisabetta Raguseo, 2019. "Big data analytics business value and firm performance: Linking with environmental context," Post-Print hal-02293765, HAL.
    4. M. M. Malik & S. Abdallah & M. Ala’raj, 2018. "Data mining and predictive analytics applications for the delivery of healthcare services: a systematic literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 287-312, November.
    5. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Papadopoulos, Thanos & Dubey, Rameshwar & Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Childe, Stephen J. & Hazen, Benjamin & Akter, Shahriar, 2017. "Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 308-317.
    6. Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Akter, Shahriar & Ren, Steven Ji-fan & Dubey, Rameshwar & Childe, Stephen J., 2017. "Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 356-365.
    7. Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Childe, Stephen J. & Roubaud, David & Fosso Wamba, Samuel & Giannakis, Mihalis & Foropon, Cyril, 2019. "Big data analytics and organizational culture as complements to swift trust and collaborative performance in the humanitarian supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 120-136.
    8. Akter, Shahriar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Babu, Mujahid Mohiuddin & Hani, Umme, 2020. "Reshaping competitive advantages with analytics capabilities in service systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Gupta, Shivam & Sivarajah, Uthayasankar & Bag, Surajit, 2023. "Assessing the impact of big data analytics on decision-making processes, forecasting, and performance of a firm," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    10. Vitor Azzari & Emerson Wagner Mainardes & Aziz Xavier Beiruth & Fábio M. Costa, 2021. "The dimensions of accounting service quality," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(8), pages 1-31, August.
    11. Suhada, Thontowi A. & Ford, Jerad A. & Verreynne, Martie-Louise & Indulska, Marta, 2021. "Motivating individuals to contribute to firms’ non-pecuniary open innovation goals," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. Majumdar, Adrija & Bose, Indranil, 2019. "Do tweets create value? A multi-period analysis of Twitter use and content of tweets for manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 1-11.
    13. Morgan Swink & Kejia Hu & Xiande Zhao, 2022. "Analytics applications, limitations, and opportunities in restaurant supply chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3710-3726, October.
    14. Bram Klievink & Bart-Jan Romijn & Scott Cunningham & Hans Bruijn, 2017. "Big data in the public sector: Uncertainties and readiness," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 267-283, April.
    15. Jörg Claussen & Tobias Kretschmer & Nils Stieglitz, 2015. "Vertical Scope, Turbulence, and the Benefits of Commitment and Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 915-929, April.
    16. Huynh, Minh-Tay & Nippa, Michael & Aichner, Thomas, 2023. "Big data analytics capabilities: Patchwork or progress? A systematic review of the status quo and implications for future research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    17. Hans-Joachim Schramm & Carolin Nicole Czaja & Michael Dittrich & Matthias Mentschel, 2019. "Current Advancements of and Future Developments for Fourth Party Logistics in a Digital Future," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Elnahass, Marwa & Jia, Xinrui & Crawford, Louise, 2024. "Disruptive technology and audit risks: Evidence from FTSE 100 companies," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    19. Schneider, Christian O. & Bremen, Philipp & Schönsleben, Paul & Alard, Robert, 2013. "Transaction cost economics in global sourcing: Assessing regional differences and implications for performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 243-254.
    20. Stefano Ciliberti & Angelo Frascarelli & Gaetano Martino, 2020. "Drivers of participation in collective arrangements in the agri‐food supply chain. Evidence from Italy using a transaction costs economics perspective," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(3), pages 387-409, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:70:y:2017:i:c:p:263-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.