IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v69y2016i5p1725-1730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation for impact: Business innovation for inclusive growth

Author

Listed:
  • Herrera, Maria Elena Baltazar

Abstract

The research uses a literature review and case studies to build a framework that describes factors leading to successful innovation for impact (I4I): innovation that enhances corporate performance and creates significant, lasting social impact. Five organizational elements influence I4I: strategic alignment, responsible purpose, institutional drivers, stakeholder engagement, and business model management. Six institutional drivers influence I4I: values, leadership, culture, strategy, structure, and policies. Firms can achieve lasting social impact by targeting systemic factors using the ecology for inclusive growth. Stakeholder engagement increases opportunities for co-creation and enables business-model innovation through knowledge gathering and creation. Strengthening and aligning organizational elements increases the likelihood of I4I, improving corporate performance and enhancing business landscape. Institutionalizing I4I creates an engine for business-model innovation, a powerful source of competitive advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Herrera, Maria Elena Baltazar, 2016. "Innovation for impact: Business innovation for inclusive growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1725-1730.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:5:p:1725-1730
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296315004683
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bradley K. Googins & Philip H. Mirvis & Steven A. Rochlin, 2007. "Next Generation Corporate Citizenship," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Beyond Good Company, chapter 1, pages 11-24, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Herrera, Maria Elena Baltazar, 2015. "Creating competitive advantage by institutionalizing corporate social innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1468-1474.
    3. Perrine Ferauge, 2012. "A Conceptual Framework Of Corporate Social Responsibility And Innovation," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(5), pages 85-96.
    4. Ferauge Perrine, 2013. "The Complementarity Of Corporate Social Responsibility And Innovation: Evidence From Belgian Firms," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(5), pages 99-113.
    5. Thomas Maak, 2007. "Responsible Leadership, Stakeholder Engagement, and the Emergence of Social Capital," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 329-343, September.
    6. Bradley K. Googins & Philip H. Mirvis & Steven A. Rochlin, 2007. "Beyond Good Company," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-60998-3.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Onea Ioana Alexandra, 2020. "Innovation Indicators and the Innovation Process - Evidence from the European Innovation Scoreboard," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(4), pages 605-620, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Pascal Gond & Jacques Igalens & Valérie Swaen & Assâad El Akremi, 2011. "The Human Resources Contribution to Responsible Leadership: An Exploration of the CSR–HR Interface," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 115-132, January.
    2. Moliterni, Fabio, 2017. "Sustainability-oriented Business Model Innovation: Context and Drivers," SAS: Society and Sustainability 263484, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    3. Sophie Lythreatis & Ahmed Mohammed Sayed Mostafa & Xiaojun Wang, 2019. "Participative Leadership and Organizational Identification in SMEs in the MENA Region: Testing the Roles of CSR Perceptions and Pride in Membership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 635-650, May.
    4. Fabio Moliterni, 2017. "Sustainability-oriented Business Model Innovation: Context and Drivers," Working Papers 2017.45, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    5. Schuler Douglas A., 2012. "A club theory approach to voluntary social programs: Multinational companies and the extractive industries transparency initiative," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Nimruji Jammulamadaka, 2020. "Reading Institutional Logics of CSR in India from a Post-colonial Location," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 599-617, May.
    7. Broadstock, David C. & Matousek, Roman & Meyer, Martin & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility impact firms' innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 99-110.
    8. Maltz, Elliot & Pierson, Kawika, 2022. "Maximizing corporate social innovation to enhance social and shareholder value: A systems thinking model of industry transformation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 12-25.
    9. Morgane Pennec & Emmanuel Raufflet, 2018. "Value Creation in Inter-Organizational Collaboration: An Empirical Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 817-834, April.
    10. Vesela R. Veleva, 2010. "Managing corporate citizenship: a new tool for companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 40-51, January.
    11. Longoni, Annachiara & Golini, Ruggero & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2014. "The role of New Forms of Work Organization in developing sustainability strategies in operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 147-160.
    12. Herrera, Maria Elena Baltazar, 2015. "Creating competitive advantage by institutionalizing corporate social innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1468-1474.
    13. Gary M. Fleischman & Eric N. Johnson & Kenton B. Walker & Sean R. Valentine, 2019. "Ethics Versus Outcomes: Managerial Responses to Incentive-Driven and Goal-Induced Employee Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(4), pages 951-967, September.
    14. Kreiling, Laura & Serval, Sarah & Peres, Raphaële & Bounfour, Ahmed, 2020. "University technology transfer organizations: Roles adopted in response to their regional innovation system stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 218-229.
    15. Mauro Sciarelli & Mario Tani & Giovanni Landi & Ornella Papaluca, 2019. "The Impact of Social Responsibility Disclosure on Corporate Financial Health: Evidences from Some Italian Public Companies," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 109-122, March.
    16. Yanica P. Dimitrova, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation – the Meaningful Connection," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 89-108.
    17. Tulika M. Varma, 2021. "Responsible Leadership and Reputation Management During a Crisis: The Cases of Delta and United Airlines," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 29-45, September.
    18. Muhammad Anwar & Sher Zaman Khan & Najib Ullah Khan, 2018. "Intellectual Capital, Entrepreneurial Strategy and New Ventures Performance: Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 10(1), pages 63-94, March.
    19. Daniel Alonso‐Martínez & Nuria González‐Álvarez & Mariano Nieto, 2019. "The influence of financial performance on corporate social innovation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 859-871, July.
    20. Rowan Mulligan & José Ramos & Pilar Martín & Ana Zornoza, 2021. "Inspiriting Innovation: The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) on Innovative Behavior as Mediated by Mindfulness and Work Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:5:p:1725-1730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.