IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v201y2025ics0148296325005697.html

A systematic investigation of why P2P services are rated higher than traditional services

Author

Listed:
  • Unnava, Vasu
  • Singh, Amit Surendra
  • Unnava, H. Rao

Abstract

Prior literature has reported a tendency for consumers to rate peer-to-peer (P2P) services more positively than the same services provided by traditional businesses (e.g. Airbnb vs. hotel). We first show that consumers experience greater empathy toward a P2P service provider (a person) than a traditional service provider (a business). We then show that P2P services enjoy higher evaluations because empathy for the provider leads consumers to tolerate minor negative elements in those settings as compared to traditional business settings. Further, we show that this effect is moderated by the perceived size of the business. The implications of this type of rating bias on traditional businesses and consumer welfare, and the limitations of this research, are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Unnava, Vasu & Singh, Amit Surendra & Unnava, H. Rao, 2025. "A systematic investigation of why P2P services are rated higher than traditional services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325005697
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325005697
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115746?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neele Inken Abend & María D. De-Juan-Vigaray & Mandy Nuszbaum, 2023. "An Experimental Study of How Missing Employee Empathy in Failed Service Interactions Affects Empathetic Customers’ EWoM-Giving Behaviour," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Ngo, Liem Viet & Nguyen, Thi Nguyet Que & Tran, Nam The & Paramita, Widya, 2020. "It takes two to tango: The role of customer empathy and resources to improve the efficacy of frontline employee empathy," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    3. Neeru Paharia & Anat Keinan & Jill Avery & Juliet B. Schor, 2011. "The Underdog Effect: The Marketing of Disadvantage and Determination through Brand Biography," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(5), pages 775-790.
    4. Marco Magnani, 2020. "The Economic And Behavioral Consequences Of Online User Reviews," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 263-292, April.
    5. Georgios Zervas & Davide Proserpio & John W. Byers, 2021. "A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Abrate, Graziano & Viglia, Giampaolo, 2016. "Strategic and tactical price decisions in hotel revenue management," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 123-132.
    7. Tassiello, Vito & Viglia, Giampaolo & Mattila, Anna S., 2018. "How handwriting reduces negative online ratings," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 171-179.
    8. Pera, Rebecca & Viglia, Giampaolo & Grazzini, Laura & Dalli, Daniele, 2019. "When empathy prevents negative reviewing behavior," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 265-278.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bresciani, Stefano & Ferraris, Alberto & Santoro, Gabriele & Premazzi, Katia & Quaglia, Roberto & Yahiaoui, Dorra & Viglia, Giampaolo, 2021. "The seven lives of Airbnb. The role of accommodation types," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Xue, Lan & Leung, Xi Y. & Ma, Shihan (David), 2022. "What makes a good “guest”: Evidence from Airbnb hosts' reviews," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Ilyes Boumahdi & Nouzha Zaoujal, 2025. "Monitoring North African regional tourism by web data," Papers 2504.19539, arXiv.org.
    4. Boto-García, David & Leoni, Veronica, 2024. "Noisy signals: Does rating volatility depend on the length of the consumption span?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    5. Narwal, Preeti & Rai, Shivam, 2022. "Individual differences and moral disengagement in Pay-What-You-Want pricing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 528-547.
    6. Gössling, Stefan & Larson, Mia & Pumputis, Aurimas, 2021. "Mutual surveillance on Airbnb," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Viglia, Giampaolo & Dolnicar, Sara, 2020. "A review of experiments in tourism and hospitality," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. Jack (Peiyao) Ma & Andrea Mantovani & Carlo Reggiani & Annette Broocks & Néstor Duch-Brown, 2024. "The Price Effects of Prohibiting Price Parity Clauses: Evidence from International Hotel Groups," Economics Series Working Papers 1043, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    9. Fatemeh Binesh & Amanda Belarmino & Carola Raab, 2021. "A meta-analysis of hotel revenue management," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(5), pages 546-558, October.
    10. Cambra-Fierro, Jesús & Polo-Redondo, Yolanda & Trifu, Andreea, 2021. "Short-term and long-term effects of touchpoints on customer perceptions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    11. Noor Hasmini Binti Abd Ghani & Mohammad Kashedul Wahab Tuhin, 2016. "Consumer Brand Relationships," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 950-957.
    12. Saito, Taiga & Takahashi, Akihiko & Koide, Noriaki & Ichifuji, Yu, 2019. "Application of online booking data to hotel revenue management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 37-53.
    13. Lena Abou El-Komboz & Anna Kerkhof & Johannes Loh, 2023. "Platform Partnership Programs and Content Supply: Evidence from the YouTube “Adpocalypse”," CESifo Working Paper Series 10363, CESifo.
    14. Aldric Vives & Liudmila Ostrovskaya, 2024. "Exploring the impact of hotel attributes and services on price and revenue: A hedonic pricing model approach with a focus on internal and external segmentation and repeat customers," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(4), pages 813-843, June.
    15. Kevin Lane Keller, 2023. "Looking forward, looking back: developing a narrative of the past, present and future of a brand," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(1), pages 1-8, January.
    16. Orhan Bahadır Doğan & V. Kumar & Avishek Lahiri, 2024. "Platform-level consequences of performance-based commission for service providers: Evidence from ridesharing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1240-1261, July.
    17. Jauhari, Hemang & Kumar, Manish & Pandey, Jayesh, 2024. "Impact of transformational leadership on service delivery behaviours of frontline service employees," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Dalia Perkumienė & Milita Vienažindienė & Biruta Švagždienė, 2021. "The Sharing Economy towards Sustainable Tourism: An Example of an Online Transport-sharing Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Asad Mohsin & Jorge Lengler, 2021. "Airbnb Hospitality: Exploring Users and Non-Users’ Perceptions and Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Yuliya Snihur & Llewellyn D. W. Thomas & Raghu Garud & Nelson Phillips, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Framing: A Literature Review and Future Research Directions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 578-606, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325005697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.