IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/anture/v95y2022ics0160738322000779.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What makes a good “guest”: Evidence from Airbnb hosts' reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Xue, Lan
  • Leung, Xi Y.
  • Ma, Shihan (David)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to systematically explore the characteristics of being a good “guest” from the perspective of Airbnb hosts. The study adopts a mixed method combining big data analysis with qualitative content analysis to analyze 10,068 reviews posted by Airbnb hosts. A framework is developed to organize the identified themes and illustrate the characteristics of being a good guest in the context of Airbnb. The framework included three layers in a hierarchical manner: customer-like (low level), guest-like (medium level), and friend-like (high level). The higher the level, the more interaction and engagement from both sides. The findings suggest that Airbnb is primarily considered a consumption space that stressed effective interaction between hosts and guests. The study renders practical implications for platforms to improve guest behaviors and enhance host-guest relationship in the sharing economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue, Lan & Leung, Xi Y. & Ma, Shihan (David), 2022. "What makes a good “guest”: Evidence from Airbnb hosts' reviews," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:anture:v:95:y:2022:i:c:s0160738322000779
    DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2022.103426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160738322000779
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.annals.2022.103426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Yue & Barnes, Stuart J. & Jia, Qiong, 2017. "Mining meaning from online ratings and reviews: Tourist satisfaction analysis using latent dirichlet allocation," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 467-483.
    2. Li, Jianping & Feng, Yuyao & Li, Guowen & Sun, Xiaolei, 2020. "Tourism companies' risk exposures on text disclosure," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Liang Tang & Silong Peng & Yiming Bi & Peng Shan & Xiyuan Hu, 2014. "A New Method Combining LDA and PLS for Dimension Reduction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-10, May.
    4. Al-Natour, Sameh & Turetken, Ozgur, 2020. "A comparative assessment of sentiment analysis and star ratings for consumer reviews," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    5. Zhu, Yunxia & Cheng, Mingming & Wang, Jie & Ma, Laikun & Jiang, Ruochen, 2019. "The construction of home feeling by Airbnb guests in the sharing economy: A semantics perspective," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 308-321.
    6. Cheng, Mingming & Zhang, Guojie, 2019. "When Western hosts meet Eastern guests: Airbnb hosts' experience with Chinese outbound tourists," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 288-303.
    7. Georgios Zervas & Davide Proserpio & John W. Byers, 2021. "A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Amélie Fiorello & Damien Bo, 2012. "Community-based ecotourism to meet the new tourist's expectations: an exploratory study," Post-Print hal-00951031, HAL.
    9. Grimwood, Bryan S.R. & Yudina, Olga & Muldoon, Meghan & Qiu, Ji, 2015. "Responsibility in tourism: A discursive analysis," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 22-38.
    10. Chien, P. Monica & Ritchie, Brent W., 2018. "Understanding intergroup conflicts in tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 177-179.
    11. Sharpley, Richard, 2014. "Host perceptions of tourism: A review of the research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 37-49.
    12. Pera, Rebecca & Viglia, Giampaolo & Grazzini, Laura & Dalli, Daniele, 2019. "When empathy prevents negative reviewing behavior," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 265-278.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scerri, Madalyn A. & Presbury, Rajka, 2020. "Airbnb Superhosts' talk in commercial homes," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Zuo, Wenming & Bai, Weijing & Zhu, Wenfeng & He, Xinming & Qiu, Xinxin, 2022. "Changes in service quality of sharing accommodation: Evidence from airbnb," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Lim, Weng Marc & Yap, Sheau-Fen & Makkar, Marian, 2021. "Home sharing in marketing and tourism at a tipping point: What do we know, how do we know, and where should we be heading?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 534-566.
    4. Huang, Dan & Coghlan, Alexandra & Jin, Xin, 2020. "Understanding the drivers of Airbnb discontinuance," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    5. Rêgo, Carmo Sousa & Almeida, Joana, 2022. "A framework to analyse conflicts between residents and tourists: The case of a historic neighbourhood in Lisbon, Portugal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    6. Dolnicar, Sara, 2019. "A review of research into paid online peer-to-peer accommodation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 248-264.
    7. Yeon, Jihwan & Song, Hyoung Ju & Lee, Seoki, 2020. "Impact of short-term rental regulation on hotel industry: a difference-in-differences approach," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Xiang, Diandian & Jiao, Guanzhe & Sun, Bin & Peng, Chenming & Ran, Yaxuan, 2022. "Prosumer-to-customer exchange in the sharing economy: Evidence from the P2P accommodation context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 426-441.
    9. Jing Lyu & Sha Fang, 2022. "Exploring Customers’ Experiences with P2P Accommodations: Measurement Scale Development and Validation in the Chinese Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Juan Luis Jiménez & Armando Ortuño & Jorge V. Pérez-Rodríguez, 2022. "How does AirBnb affect local Spanish tourism markets?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2515-2545, May.
    11. Tao Liu & Kewei Shi & Lingli Hu & Yuqing Liu & Yunyao Liu, 2023. "A New Instrument for Measuring Customers’ Perceptions of Service Warmth: A Big Data and Machine Learning Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    12. Gössling, Stefan & Larson, Mia & Pumputis, Aurimas, 2021. "Mutual surveillance on Airbnb," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. Shuqair, Saleh & Pinto, Diego Costa & Mattila, Anna S., 2019. "Benefits of authenticity: Post-failure loyalty in the sharing economy," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Hamilton, Kathy & Hewer, Paul & Tonner, Andrea, 2022. "Authoritative performances of care in home exchange," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    15. Wilawan Jansri, 2019. "Perception of Residents, Community Participation and Support for Tourism Development in the Old Town Muang Songkhla, Thailand," Proceedings of the 13th International RAIS Conference, June 10-11, 2019 07WJ, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    16. Wang, Binni & Wang, Pong & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Customer satisfaction service match and service quality-based blockchain cloud manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    17. Salvatore Bimonte & Antonella D’Agostino, 2021. "Tourism development and residents’ well-being: Comparing two seaside destinations in Italy," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(7), pages 1508-1525, November.
    18. Vu Quang Trinh & Neelu Seetaram & Kiet Tuan Duong & Xuan Vinh Vo, 2023. "Collusive behaviour, risk and performance of tourism firms," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(8), pages 2103-2128, December.
    19. M. Narciso, 2022. "The Unreliability of Online Review Mechanisms," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 349-368, September.
    20. Gheorghe Epuran & Bianca Tescașiu & Alina-Simona Tecău & Ioana-Simona Ivasciuc & Adina-Nicoleta Candrea, 2020. "Permaculture and Downshifting-Sources of Sustainable Tourism Development in Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:anture:v:95:y:2022:i:c:s0160738322000779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/annals-of-tourism-research/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.