IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v54y2020ics0268401219311181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative assessment of sentiment analysis and star ratings for consumer reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Al-Natour, Sameh
  • Turetken, Ozgur

Abstract

Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) is prominent and abundant in consumer domains. Both consumers and product/service providers need help in understanding and navigating the resulting information spaces, which are vast and dynamic. The general tone or polarity of reviews, blogs or tweets provides such help. In this paper, we explore the viability of automatic sentiment analysis (SA) for assessing the polarity of a product or a service review. To do so, we examine the potential of the major approaches to sentiment analysis, along with star ratings, in capturing the true sentiment of a review. We further model contextual factors (specifically, product type and review length) as two moderators affecting SA accuracy. The results of our analysis of 900 reviews suggest that different tools representing the main approaches to SA display differing levels of accuracy, yet overall, SA is very effective in detecting the underlying tone of the analyzed content, and can be used as a complement or an alternative to star ratings. The results further reveal that contextual factors such as product type and review length, play a role in affecting the ability of a technique to reflect the true sentiment of a review.

Suggested Citation

  • Al-Natour, Sameh & Turetken, Ozgur, 2020. "A comparative assessment of sentiment analysis and star ratings for consumer reviews," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:54:y:2020:i:c:s0268401219311181
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401219311181
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102132?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ransome Epie Bawack & Samuel Fosso Wamba & Kevin Daniel André Carillo & Shahriar Akter, 2022. "Artificial intelligence in E-Commerce: a bibliometric study and literature review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 297-338, March.
    2. Enrique Bigne & Carla Ruiz & Carmen Perez-Cabañero & Antonio Cuenca, 2023. "Are customer star ratings and sentiments aligned? A deep learning study of the customer service experience in tourism destinations," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(1), pages 281-314, March.
    3. Xue, Lan & Leung, Xi Y. & Ma, Shihan (David), 2022. "What makes a good “guest”: Evidence from Airbnb hosts' reviews," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    4. Sambit Tripathi & Amit V. Deokar & Haya Ajjan, 2022. "Understanding the Order Effect of Online Reviews: A Text Mining Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1971-1988, December.
    5. Jia-Lang Xu & Ying-Lin Hsu, 2022. "The Impact of News Sentiment Indicators on Agricultural Product Prices," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(4), pages 1645-1657, April.
    6. Md Shamim Hossain & Mst Farjana Rahman, 2023. "Customer Sentiment Analysis and Prediction of Insurance Products’ Reviews Using Machine Learning Approaches," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 12(4), pages 386-402, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:54:y:2020:i:c:s0268401219311181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.