IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v199y2025ics0148296325003108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is AI suitable to speak about morality? Consumer response to AI-generated moral appeals in the case of fair trade products

Author

Listed:
  • Trzebiński, Wojciech
  • Konuk, Faruk Anıl
  • Marciniak, Beata

Abstract

While marketing can refer to morality, it remains insufficiently explained how consumers respond to AI-generated moral appeals. Motivated by that gap, the current research applied incongruity theory to investigate the effect of moral appeal presence on the persuasiveness of AI (vs. human) product advice in two experiments (N = 445), manipulating moral appeal presence in fair-trade product messages. The effect of moral appeal presence on purchase intent through message-source fit was more positive when the product recommendation was provided by humans (vs. AI) (Study 1). For AI-generated advice, the effect of moral appeal presence on AI advice following intent through message-source fit was less negative when the AI agent was perceived as more anthropomorphized, and AI superiority belief was higher (Study 2). The results extend the knowledge of consumer response to AI and the role of incongruity in AI perception. Marketers are guided on how to involve moral appeals in AI communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Trzebiński, Wojciech & Konuk, Faruk Anıl & Marciniak, Beata, 2025. "Is AI suitable to speak about morality? Consumer response to AI-generated moral appeals in the case of fair trade products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325003108
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325003108
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115487?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325003108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.