IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i23p9137-d458126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Process Evaluation Examining the Performance, Adherence, and Acceptability of a Physical Activity and Diet Artificial Intelligence Virtual Health Assistant

Author

Listed:
  • Courtney R. Davis

    (City East Campus, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia, GPO Box 247, Adelaide 5001, Australia
    City East Campus, University of South Australia, Clinical and Health Sciences, GPO Box 247, Adelaide 5001, Australia)

  • Karen J. Murphy

    (City East Campus, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia, GPO Box 247, Adelaide 5001, Australia
    City East Campus, University of South Australia, Clinical and Health Sciences, GPO Box 247, Adelaide 5001, Australia)

  • Rachel G. Curtis

    (City East Campus, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia, GPO Box 247, Adelaide 5001, Australia
    City East Campus, University of South Australia, Allied Health and Human Performance, GPO Box 247, Adelaide 5001, Australia)

  • Carol A. Maher

    (City East Campus, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, University of South Australia, GPO Box 247, Adelaide 5001, Australia
    City East Campus, University of South Australia, Allied Health and Human Performance, GPO Box 247, Adelaide 5001, Australia)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence virtual health assistants are a promising emerging technology. This study is a process evaluation of a 12-week pilot physical activity and diet program delivered by virtual assistant “Paola”. This single-arm repeated measures study ( n = 28, aged 45–75 years) was evaluated on technical performance (accuracy of conversational exchanges), engagement (number of weekly check-ins completed), adherence (percentage of step goal and recommended food servings), and user feedback. Paola correctly asked scripted questions and responded to participants during the check-ins 97% and 96% of the time, respectively, but correctly responded to spontaneous exchanges only 21% of the time. Participants completed 63% of weekly check-ins and conducted a total of 3648 exchanges. Mean dietary adherence was 91% and was lowest for discretionary foods, grains, red meat, and vegetables. Participants met their step goal 59% of the time. Participants enjoyed the program and found Paola useful during check-ins but not for spontaneous exchanges. More in-depth knowledge, personalized advice and spontaneity were identified as important improvements. Virtual health assistants should ensure an adequate knowledge base and ability to recognize intents and entities, include personality and spontaneity, and provide ongoing technical troubleshooting of the virtual assistant to ensure the assistant remains effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Courtney R. Davis & Karen J. Murphy & Rachel G. Curtis & Carol A. Maher, 2020. "A Process Evaluation Examining the Performance, Adherence, and Acceptability of a Physical Activity and Diet Artificial Intelligence Virtual Health Assistant," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:9137-:d:458126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/9137/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/9137/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:9137-:d:458126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.