IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v155y2023ipas0148296322008529.html

The effect of manufacturing agent heterogeneity on enterprise innovation performance and competitive advantage in the era of digital transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Jing
  • Zhang, Wanfei
  • Guan, Tao
  • Feng, Qiuhong
  • Mardani, Abbas

Abstract

The digital transformation of the manufacturing industry has reshaped the collaborative innovation model of multi-agent value co-creation in the value chain.The nature and collaborative behavior of heterogeneous agents in the value chain are key factors affecting innovation performance. This study uses the structural equation model (SEM) and conducts a questionnaire survey on 381 manufacturing enterprises. It examines the different impacts of agent heterogeneity and collaborative behavior on the innovation performance of manufacturing enterprises in digital transformation under different digitization levels and enterprise sizes. The results show that highly digitized or large-scale enterprises can reduce the negative impact of agent heterogeneity on innovation performance. However, the cooperation quality of enterprises with low digitalization levels or small-scale enterprises plays an important role in improving enterprise performance. These results help manufacturing enterprises accelerate digital transformation and provide a strategic reference for transforming and upgrading the digital economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Jing & Zhang, Wanfei & Guan, Tao & Feng, Qiuhong & Mardani, Abbas, 2023. "The effect of manufacturing agent heterogeneity on enterprise innovation performance and competitive advantage in the era of digital transformation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:155:y:2023:i:pa:s0148296322008529
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322008529
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113387?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lamiae Benhayoun-Sadafiyine & Néstor Fabián Ayala & Marie-Anne Le Dain, 2021. "SMEs innovating in collaborative networks: how does absorptive capacity matter for innovation performance in times of good partnership quality?," Post-Print halshs-03232737, HAL.
    2. Chen Tao & Yiying Qu & Hao Ren & Zhuopin Guo, 2020. "The Influence of Inter-Enterprise Knowledge Heterogeneity on Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Trust and Contract," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Nelson Phillips & Thomas B. Lawrence & Cynthia Hardy, 2000. "Inter‐organizational Collaboration and the Dynamics of Institutional Fields," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 1-1, January.
    4. Teece, David J., 2018. "Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1367-1387.
    5. Danlei Feng & Mingzhao Hu & Lingdi Zhao & Sha Liu, 2022. "The Impact of Firm Heterogeneity and External Factor Change on Innovation: Evidence from the Vehicle Industry Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Joseph K. Nwankpa & Jeffrey W. Merhout, 2020. "Exploring the Effect of Digital Investment on IT Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
    7. Wai Fong Boh & Cheng‐Jen Huang & Anne Wu, 2020. "Investor experience and innovation performance: The mediating role of external cooperation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 124-151, January.
    8. Lee, Yu-Muo & Yang, Chyan, 2014. "The relationships among network ties, organizational agility, and organizational performance: A study of the flat glass industry in Taiwan," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 206-226, March.
    9. Mao, Chongfeng & Yu, Xianyun & Zhou, Qing & Harms, Rainer & Fang, Gang, 2020. "Knowledge growth in university-industry innovation networks – Results from a simulation study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    10. Haiying Lin, 2012. "Cross-sector Alliances for Corporate Social Responsibility Partner Heterogeneity Moderates Environmental Strategy Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 219-229, October.
    11. Arvind Parkhe, 1991. "Interfirm Diversity, Organizational Learning, and Longevity in Global Strategic Alliances," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 22(4), pages 579-601, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre‐Xavier Meschi & Anne Norheim‐Hansen, 2020. "Partner‐diversity effects on alliance termination in the early stage of green alliance formation: Empirical evidence from carbon‐emission reduction projects in Latin America," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 250-261, January.
    2. Su Jung Jee & So Young Sohn, 2023. "A firm’s creation of proprietary knowledge linked to the knowledge spilled over from its research publications: the case of artificial intelligence," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 32(4), pages 876-900.
    3. Kishore Gopalakrishna Pillai & Smitha R. Nair & Nadia Zahoor & Zaheer Khan, 2024. "Driving Social Innovation in Bottom-of-the-Pyramid Markets through International Social Alliances: The Role of Legitimacy," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 567-595, June.
    4. Zihanxin Li & Guilong Zhu, 2021. "Knowledge Transfer Performance of Industry-University-Research Institute Collaboration in China: The Moderating Effect of Partner Difference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Cobeña, Mar & Gallego, Ángeles & Casanueva, Cristóbal, 2017. "Heterogeneity, diversity and complementarity in alliance portfolios," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 464-476.
    6. Roblek Vasja & Meško Maja & Podbregar Iztok, 2021. "Mapping of the Emergence of Society 5.0: A Bibliometric Analysis," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 54(4), pages 293-305, December.
    7. Wei Xiong & Jiaqi Qin & Wenjing Luo & Qian Cheng, 2025. "The Influence of the Spatial Structure of Urban Agglomeration on the Digital Economy and Its Impact Mechanism: Evidence From China," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 48(2), pages 153-179, March.
    8. Tian, Xinci & Ma, Yueyue, 2026. "Digital asset intensity and strategic disclosure effects on firm performance: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    9. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    10. Haonan Chen & Xiaoning Cui & Zhi Li, 2025. "Research on the Impact of Digital-Realistic Integration to Promote Sustainable Development of Enterprises: Based on the Perspective of Technology Bias," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, April.
    11. Hongyi Mao & Zongjun Wang & Lin Yi, 2021. "Does Entrepreneurial Orientation Lead to Successful Sustainable Innovation? The Evidence from Chinese Environmentally Friendly Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Rodrigues da Silva, Jassen & Cannarozzo Tinoco, Maria Auxiliadora & Saccani, Nicola & Frank, Alejandro G., 2025. "Artificial Intelligence capabilities in Digital Servitization: Identifying digital opportunities for different service types," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    13. Jean-Michel Sahut & Luca Iandoli & Frédéric Teulon, 2021. "The age of digital entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1159-1169, February.
    14. Yu-Muo Lee & Jin-Li Hu, 2018. "Integrated Approaches for Business Sustainability: The Perspective of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Gawer, Annabelle & Harracá, Martín, 2025. "Inconsistent platform governance and social contagion of misconduct in digital ecosystems: A complementors perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    16. Jinhui Zheng & Shikuan Zhao & Yan Tan & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente, 2026. "Does the digital economy promote synergy between pollution control and carbon reduction? Evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 2683-2716, February.
    17. Satish Nambisan & Yadong Luo, 2021. "Toward a loose coupling view of digital globalization," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(8), pages 1646-1663, October.
    18. Cui Zhang & Xiongjin Feng & Yanzhen Wang, 2022. "Technology Spillovers among Innovation Agents from the Perspective of Network Connectedness," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Tsang, Eric W. K., 1999. "A preliminary typology of learning in international strategic alliances," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 211-229, October.
    20. Yadong Luo, 2007. "Private control and collective control in international joint ventures," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 531-566, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:155:y:2023:i:pa:s0148296322008529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.