IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v37y2017i2p54-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobility of knowledge work and affordances of digital technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Nelson, Sarah Beth
  • Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein
  • Thomson, Leslie

Abstract

The focus of this work arises from two needs within information science literature: (1) to understand more, from an empirically driven perspective, about the increasingly visible yet understudied mobile work population, and (2) to address more clearly, from a theoretical standpoint, the ways in which information and communication technologies (ICTs) mediate the work practices of these mobile workers. Drawing on the affordance perspective, this research goes beyond simplistic conceptualizations of technological effects to explore the roles of multiple ICTs in enabling mobile knowledge work. In this paper, the use of ICTs in mobilizing information practices and the ways in which ICTs generate affordances along different mobility dimensions (spatial, temporal, contextual, and social) are examined. The empirical base of this research is a field of study of 33 mobile knowledge workers (MKWs); broadly, it focuses on the ways they employ ICTs to accomplish work in dynamic and unpredictable work conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelson, Sarah Beth & Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein & Thomson, Leslie, 2017. "Mobility of knowledge work and affordances of digital technologies," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 54-62.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:37:y:2017:i:2:p:54-62
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401216304042
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wanda J. Orlikowski & C. Suzanne Iacono, 2001. "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 121-134, June.
    2. Mark Perry & Jackie Brodie, 2006. "Virtually Connected, Practically Mobile," Springer Books, in: J. H. Erik Andriessen & Matti Vartiainen (ed.), Mobile Virtual Work, chapter 5, pages 95-127, Springer.
    3. Michael K. Buckland, 1991. "Information as thing," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 42(5), pages 351-360, June.
    4. Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi & Steve Sawyer, 2015. "Theorizing on the take-up of social technologies, organizational policies and norms, and consultants' knowledge-sharing practices," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(1), pages 162-179, January.
    5. Steve Sawyer & Haiyan Huang, 2007. "Conceptualizing information, technology, and people: Comparing information science and information systems literatures," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(10), pages 1436-1447, August.
    6. David Allen & Stan Karanasios & Mira Slavova, 2011. "Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(4), pages 776-788, April.
    7. Michael Buckland, 1991. "Rejoinder to “Information as thing”," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 42(10), pages 758-758, December.
    8. David Allen & Stan Karanasios & Mira Slavova, 2011. "Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(4), pages 776-788, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tatiana Harkiolakis & Marcos Komodromos, 2023. "Supporting Knowledge Workers’ Health and Well-Being in the Post-Lockdown Era," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Sutherland, Will & Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein, 2018. "The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 328-341.
    3. Harkiolakis, Tatiana & Komodromos, Marcos, 2023. "Supporting knowledge workers’ health and well-being in the post-lockdown era," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118409, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Iliescu Andra Nicoleta, 2021. "From knowledge workers to knowmads: skills, roles and attributes – A literature review," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 128-138, December.
    5. D'Ambra, John & Akter, Shahriar & Mariani, Marcello, 2022. "Digital transformation of higher education in Australia: Understanding affordance dynamics in E-Textbook engagement and use," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 283-295.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isto Huvila, 2022. "Making and taking information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 528-541, April.
    2. Cornelius, Kristin B., 2019. "Zombie contracts, dark patterns of design, and 'documentisation'," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(2), pages 1-25.
    3. Natalie Pang & Stan Karanasios & Misita Anwar, 2020. "Exploring the Information Worlds of Older Persons During Disasters," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(6), pages 619-631, June.
    4. Darrin Baines & Robert J R Elliott, 2020. "Defining misinformation, disinformation and malinformation: An urgent need for clarity during the COVID-19 infodemic," Discussion Papers 20-06, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
    5. Alaimo, Cristina & Kallinikos, Jannis, 2022. "Organizations decentered: data objects, technology and knowledge," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112470, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Jeremy Pitt & Daniel Ramirez-Cano & Moez Draief & Alexander Artikis, 2011. "Interleaving multi-agent systems and social networks for organized adaptation," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 344-378, November.
    7. Franklin Riley & David K. Allen & Thomas Daniel Wilson, 2022. "When politicians and the experts collide: Organization and the creation of information spheres," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(8), pages 1127-1139, August.
    8. Raphaël Gellert, 2022. "Comparing definitions of data and information in data protection law and machine learning: A useful way forward to meaningfully regulate algorithms?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 156-176, January.
    9. Hicks, Alison, 2022. "The missing link: Towards an integrated health and information literacy research agenda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    10. Darin Freeburg, 2019. "The Knowing Model: Facilitating Behaviour Change in Organisations," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Isto Huvila, 2020. "Use-Oriented Information and Knowledge Management: Information Production and Use Practices as an Element of the Value and Impact of Information," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Ann Svensson, 2020. "Identifying Motives for Implementing eHealth by using Activity Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, February.
    13. Yonit Rusho & Daphne R. Raban, 2020. "Hands on: Information Experiences as Sources of Value," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(6), pages 671-684, June.
    14. Rong Tang & Bharat Mehra & Jia Tina Du & Yuxiang (Chris) Zhao, 2021. "Framing a discussion on paradigm shift(s) in the field of information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(2), pages 253-258, February.
    15. Alarape, A. A. & Adegboye M. O. & Ogunniran O. O & Omoba, F. A, 2021. "Health Information Resources and Clinical Core Skills as Predictors of Medical Doctors Clinical Decision Making in Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital, Ile-Ife, Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(6), pages 175-184, June.
    16. Ngoc Quyet Le & Shankar Sankaran, 2023. "The importance of interactions in supporting online study," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 39(1), pages 105-113, January.
    17. Wayne de Fremery & Michael K. Buckland, 2022. "Copy theory," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(3), pages 407-418, March.
    18. Evaristo Kangwa, 2022. "Compatibility of Problem Solving Theory and Activity Theory," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(10), pages 34-41, October.
    19. Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou & Eli Hustad, 2023. "Bridging Digital Divides: a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 955-969, June.
    20. Bryce Clayton Newell, 2023. "Surveillance as information practice," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(4), pages 444-460, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:37:y:2017:i:2:p:54-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.