IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1298-d319055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Motives for Implementing eHealth by using Activity Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Ann Svensson

    (School of Business, Economics and IT, University West, 461 86 Trollhättan, Sweden)

Abstract

eHealth interventions are utilized as a solution to address the current demographic challenges in society, as the number of old people increases. Thus, working life, work practice, and professional requirements needed for providing healthcare services will be transformed. The aim of this paper is to explore contradictive motives regarding the professionals’ work practice when introducing innovative eHealth technologies in Scandinavian healthcare services at a municipal level. The study is based on two qualitative group interviews where nurses, assistant nurses, occupational and physiotherapists, as well as project managers participated. Two persons from an IT department were also interviewed. The interviews were analyzed by thematic analysis. The activity theory is used to explore the individuals’ different contradictive motives in this work practice. The work practice consists of a collaborative activity, where expansive learning is important in this transformation of work to obtain a sustainable society. The motives identified in this study are to 1) improve quality of life for the patients, 2) create attractive and interesting work for the employees, 3) save money for the municipality, 4) learn about new technology, and 5) use the municipality’s resources effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann Svensson, 2020. "Identifying Motives for Implementing eHealth by using Activity Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1298-:d:319055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1298/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1298/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferlie, Ewan & Crilly, Tessa & Jashapara, Ashok & Peckham, Anna, 2012. "Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare: A critical review of health sector and generic management literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(8), pages 1297-1304.
    2. Letizia Lo Presti & Mario Testa & Vittoria Marino & Pierpaolo Singer, 2019. "Engagement in Healthcare Systems: Adopting Digital Tools for a Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. David Allen & Stan Karanasios & Mira Slavova, 2011. "Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(4), pages 776-788, April.
    4. David Allen & Stan Karanasios & Mira Slavova, 2011. "Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(4), pages 776-788, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalie Pang & Stan Karanasios & Misita Anwar, 2020. "Exploring the Information Worlds of Older Persons During Disasters," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(6), pages 619-631, June.
    2. Franklin Riley & David K. Allen & Thomas Daniel Wilson, 2022. "When politicians and the experts collide: Organization and the creation of information spheres," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(8), pages 1127-1139, August.
    3. Rong Tang & Bharat Mehra & Jia Tina Du & Yuxiang (Chris) Zhao, 2021. "Framing a discussion on paradigm shift(s) in the field of information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(2), pages 253-258, February.
    4. Ngoc Quyet Le & Shankar Sankaran, 2023. "The importance of interactions in supporting online study," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 39(1), pages 105-113, January.
    5. Evaristo Kangwa, 2022. "Compatibility of Problem Solving Theory and Activity Theory," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(10), pages 34-41, October.
    6. Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou & Eli Hustad, 2023. "Bridging Digital Divides: a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 955-969, June.
    7. Isto Huvila, 2022. "Making and taking information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 528-541, April.
    8. Nelson, Sarah Beth & Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein & Thomson, Leslie, 2017. "Mobility of knowledge work and affordances of digital technologies," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 54-62.
    9. Justyna Berniak-Woźny & Małgorzata Rataj, 2023. "Towards Green and Sustainable Healthcare: A Literature Review and Research Agenda for Green Leadership in the Healthcare Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Alla Mostepaniuk & Turgay Akalin & Mohammad Reza Parish, 2023. "Practices Pursuing the Sustainability of A Healthcare Organization: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    11. FIASO Federazione Asl e Ospedali, 2017. "Knowledge Management e modelli strategici in sanit?. Una review strutturata della letteratura," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(103), pages 73-91.
    12. Alexandra Edelman & Judy Taylor & Pavel V. Ovseiko & Stephanie M. Topp, 2019. "“‘Academic’ is a dirty word”: Intended impact pathways of an emerging academic health centre in tropical regional Australia," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 661-678, January.
    13. Norbert Laurisz & Marek Ćwiklicki & Michał Żabiński & Rossella Canestrino & Pierpaolo Magliocca, 2023. "The Stakeholders’ Involvement in Healthcare 4.0 Services Provision: The Perspective of Co-Creation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, January.
    14. FIASO Federazione Asl e Ospedali, 2017. "Sviluppo di standard di erogazione dell?attivit? ambulatoriale per la riorganizzazione di un?Azienda Sanitaria Locale," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(103), pages 95-115.
    15. Roehrich, Jens K. & Lewis, Michael A. & George, Gerard, 2014. "Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 110-119.
    16. Ii, Suzanne Sayuri & Fitzgerald, Louise & Morys-Carter, Megan M. & Davie, Natasha L. & Barker, Richard, 2018. "Knowledge translation in tri-sectoral collaborations: An exploration of perceptions of academia, industry and healthcare collaborations in innovation adoption," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 175-183.
    17. Fabrizio Pecoraro & Elaheh Pourabbas & Fernando Rolli & Chiara Parretti, 2022. "Digitally Sustainable Information Systems in Axiomatic Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Anne Lunden & Marianne Teräs & Tarja Kvist & Arja Häggman‐Laitila, 2019. "Transformative agency and tensions in knowledge management—A qualitative interview study for nurse leaders," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 969-979, March.
    19. French, Catherine E. & Ferlie, Ewan & Fulop, Naomi J., 2014. "The international spread of Academic Health Science Centres: A scoping review and the case of policy transfer to England," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 382-391.
    20. Lindberg, Kajsa & Mørk, Bjørn Erik & Walter, Lars, 2019. "Emergent coordination and situated learning in a Hybrid OR: The mixed blessing of using radiation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 232-239.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1298-:d:319055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.