IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/mesame/vhtml10.3280-mesa2017-103005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Management e modelli strategici in sanit?. Una review strutturata della letteratura

Author

Listed:
  • FIASO Federazione Asl e Ospedali

Abstract

Le aziende sanitarie stanno fronteggiandoun tema fondamentale: erogareservizi quantitativamente e qualitativamentesempre migliori a fronte dirisorse decrescenti. Gli studi di PublicManagement hanno da tempo vistonella generazione di valore pubblicouna possibile soluzione a questo problema,ma recentemente hanno contribuitoa questo dibattito anche glistudiosi di Business Model nell?intentodi fondere assieme elementi di teoria edi pratica. A tal scopo, ben si addiconoi risultati delle ricerche sul KnowledgeManagement, che stanno progressivamenteridisegnando i modi di concepirela produzione e offrire i servizi.Questo paper si colloca in tale contestoper verificare, attraverso una revisionestrutturata della letteratura, l?esistenzae la disseminazione di frameworkad hoc per le aziende sanitare,che possano risultare utili nelle sceltestrategiche delle aziende sanitarie. Irisultati della ricerca mostrano chemolto rimane ancora da fare: gli studioggi disponibili consistono perlopiuin adozioni acritiche di modelli sviluppatiper le imprese private. In conclusionesono dunque fornite delle lineeguidaper le ricerche future e alcuneindicazioni di Policy.

Suggested Citation

  • FIASO Federazione Asl e Ospedali, 2017. "Knowledge Management e modelli strategici in sanit?. Una review strutturata della letteratura," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(103), pages 73-91.
  • Handle: RePEc:fan:mesame:v:html10.3280/mesa2017-103005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=62416&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cacace, Mirella & Ettelt, Stefanie & Mays, Nicholas & Nolte, Ellen, 2013. "Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies: Towards a set of generic quality criteria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 156-162.
    2. Ferlie, Ewan & Crilly, Tessa & Jashapara, Ashok & Peckham, Anna, 2012. "Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare: A critical review of health sector and generic management literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(8), pages 1297-1304.
    3. Varabyova, Yauheniya & Schreyögg, Jonas, 2013. "International comparisons of the technical efficiency of the hospital sector: Panel data analysis of OECD countries using parametric and non-parametric approaches," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 70-79.
    4. Tomoyoshi Yamazaki & Katsuhiro Umemoto, 2010. "Knowledge Management of Healthcare by Clinical-Pathways," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 119-125.
    5. Mohammad Soltani Delgosha & Ali Amoei Ojaki & Hamidreza Farhadi, 2013. "The Business Values of Patient Knowledge Management (PKM) in the Healthcare Industry," International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics (IJHISI), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 70-79, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. FIASO Federazione Asl e Ospedali, 2018. "Knowledge Management e modelli strategici in sanit?. Una review strutturata della letteratura," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(103), pages 97-115.
    2. Alonso, José M. & Clifton, Judith & Díaz-Fuentes, Daniel, 2015. "The impact of New Public Management on efficiency: An analysis of Madrid's hospitals," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 333-340.
    3. Behrendt, Katja & Groene, Oliver, 2016. "Mechanisms and effects of public reporting of surgeon outcomes: A systematic review of the literature," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(10), pages 1151-1161.
    4. Yauheniya Varabyova & Jonas Schreyögg, 2018. "Integrating quality into the nonparametric analysis of efficiency: a simulation comparison of popular methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 261(1), pages 365-392, February.
    5. Zare Ahmadabadi, Habib & Zamzam, Fatemeh & Emrouznejad, Ali & Naser Sadrabadi, Alireza & Morovati Sharifabadi, Ali, 2024. "Measuring sustainable performance of OECD countries considering CO2 emissions: A new optimistic-pessimistic distance friction Minimization Model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Kosycarz, Ewa & Dędys, Monika & Ekes, Maria & Wranik, Wiesława Dominika, 2023. "The effects of provider contract types and fiscal decentralization on the efficiency of the Polish hospital sector: A data envelopment analysis across 16 health regions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    7. Fabien Canolle & Darijana Antonić & António Casa Nova & Anatoliy Goncharuk & Paulo Melo & Vítor Raposo & Didier Vinot, 2022. "Advancement of Efficiency Evaluation for Healthcare," Post-Print hal-03586992, HAL.
    8. Marwa Hasni & Safa Bhar Layeb & Najla Omrane Aissaoui & Aymen Mannai, 2022. "Hybrid model for a cross‐department efficiency evaluation in healthcare systems," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1311-1329, July.
    9. Zhang, Cai Wen & Yang, Yuanhui, 2023. "Appraisal of regional hospital efficiency and healthcare quality in China: Impacts of subsidies and marketization," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. Dana Jašková, 2021. "Efficiency of management processes in a private hospital," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(1), pages 436-446, September.
    11. Alexander Karmann & Felix Roesel, 2017. "Hospital Policy and Productivity – Evidence from German States," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(12), pages 1548-1565, December.
    12. Gianluca Bortoletto & Donata Favaro, 2019. "Healthcare efficiency across European countries during the recent economic crisis," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(2), pages 9-38.
    13. Adam Pilny & Felix Roesel, 2020. "Are Doctors Better Health Ministers?," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(4), pages 498-532.
    14. Bao Hoang Nguyen & Robin C. Sickles & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2021. "What do we know from the vast literature on efficiency and productivity in healthcare? A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis," CEPA Working Papers Series WP092021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    15. repec:plo:pone00:0234252 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Nabila Asghar & Hafeez-ur-Rehman & Hafiz Ghulam Mujaddid, 2018. "Efficiency Analysis Of Hospitals In Punjab Districts: An Application Of Dea Bootstrap," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 14(1), pages 14-10.
    17. Puertas, Rosa & Marti, Luisa & Guaita-Martinez, José M., 2020. "Innovation, lifestyle, policy and socioeconomic factors: An analysis of European quality of life," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Matthias Fischer & Harald Heinrichs, 2018. "Dimensions, Dialectic, Discourse. Three Political Perspectives on the Sustainability of the German Healthcare System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Nabila Asghar & Hafeez-ur-Rehman & Hafiz Ghulam Mujaddid, 2018. "Efficiency Analysis Of Hospitals In Punjab Districts: An Application Of Dea Bootstrap," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 14(1), pages 120-128.
    20. Elorza, María Eugenia & Moscoso, Nebel Silvana & Blanco, Anibal Manuel, 2022. "Assessing performance in health care: A mathematical programming approach for the re-design of primary health care networks," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    21. Anthun, Kjartan Sarheim & Kittelsen, Sverre Andreas Campbell & Magnussen, Jon, 2017. "Productivity growth, case mix and optimal size of hospitals. A 16-year study of the Norwegian hospital sector," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(4), pages 418-425.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:mesame:v:html10.3280/mesa2017-103005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=180 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.