IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v33y2013i3p567-582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards model governance in predictive toxicology

Author

Listed:
  • Palczewska, Anna
  • Fu, Xin
  • Trundle, Paul
  • Yang, Longzhi
  • Neagu, Daniel
  • Ridley, Mick
  • Travis, Kim

Abstract

Efficient management of toxicity information as an enterprise asset is increasingly important for the chemical, pharmaceutical, cosmetics and food industries. Many organisations focus on better information organisation and reuse, in an attempt to reduce the costs of testing and manufacturing in the product development phase. Toxicity information is extracted not only from toxicity data but also from predictive models. Accurate and appropriately shared models can bring a number of benefits if we are able to make effective use of existing expertise. Although usage of existing models may provide high-impact insights into the relationships between chemical attributes and specific toxicological effects, they can also be a source of risk for incorrect decisions. Thus, there is a need to provide a framework for efficient model management. To address this gap, this paper introduces a concept of model governance, that is based upon data governance principles. We extend the data governance processes by adding procedures that allow the evaluation of model use and governance for enterprise purposes. The core aspect of model governance is model representation. We propose six rules that form the basis of a model representation schema, called Minimum Information About a QSAR Model Representation (MIAQMR). As a proof-of-concept of our model governance framework we develop a web application called Model and Data Farm (MADFARM), in which models are described by the MIAQMR-ML markup language.

Suggested Citation

  • Palczewska, Anna & Fu, Xin & Trundle, Paul & Yang, Longzhi & Neagu, Daniel & Ridley, Mick & Travis, Kim, 2013. "Towards model governance in predictive toxicology," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 567-582.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:33:y:2013:i:3:p:567-582
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.02.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401213000388
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.02.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Kewen & Zhao, Yuxiang & Zhu, Qinghua & Tan, Xiaojie & Zheng, Hua, 2011. "A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 572-581.
    2. Edgar Serna M.,, 2012. "Maturity model of Knowledge Management in the interpretativist perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 365-371.
    3. Kooper, M.N. & Maes, R. & Lindgreen, E.E.O. Roos, 2011. "On the governance of information: Introducing a new concept of governance to support the management of information," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 195-200.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Duvier, Caroline & Neagu, Daniel & Oltean-Dumbrava, Crina & Dickens, Dave, 2018. "Data quality challenges in the UK social housing sector," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 196-200.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buvár Ágnes & Gáti Mirkó, 2023. "Digital marketing adoption of microenterprises in a technology acceptance approach," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 18(2), pages 127-144, June.
    2. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    3. Jones, Alice & Mutch, Alistair & Valero-Silva, Néstor, 2013. "Exploring information flows at Nottingham City Homes," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 291-299.
    4. Samir Hammami & Omar Durrah & Syed Ahsan Jamil & Mohammedosman Eltigani, 2022. "Engaging Knowledge Capabilities to Sustain the Application of Information Technology Governance in Healthcare Institutions," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    5. Serna M., Edgar, 2015. "Maturity model of transdisciplinary knowledge management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 647-654.
    6. João Batista Sarmento dos Santos-Neto & Ana Paula Cabral Seixas Costa, 2023. "A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Selecting a Maturity Model," International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), IGI Global, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Lucio-Nieto, Teresa & Colomo-Palacios, Ricardo & Soto-Acosta, Pedro & Popa, Simona & Amescua-Seco, Antonio, 2012. "Implementing an IT service information management framework: The case of COTEMAR," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 589-594.
    8. Giousmpasoglou, Charalampos & Dinh, Dzung, 2022. "Using contactless mobile payment in the Vietnamese restaurant industry," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 3-15.
    9. Slepchuk, Alec N. & Milne, George R. & Swani, Kunal, 2022. "Overcoming privacy concerns in consumers’ use of health information technologies: A justice framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 782-793.
    10. Afsay, Akram & Tahriri, Arash & Rezaee, Zabihollah, 2023. "A meta-analysis of factors affecting acceptance of information technology in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    11. Rahimi, Fatemeh & Møller, Charles & Hvam, Lars, 2016. "Business process management and IT management: The missing integration," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 142-154.
    12. Milomir Vojvodic & Christian Hitz, 2022. "Relation of Data Governance, Customer-Centricity and Data Processing Compliance," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(5), pages 109-148.
    13. Olaisen, Johan & Revang, Oivind, 2018. "Exploring the performance of tacit knowledge: How to make ordinary people deliver extraordinary results in teams," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 295-304.
    14. Gerpott, Torsten J. & Ahmadi, Nima, 2015. "Determinants of willingness to look for separate international roaming services—An empirical study of mobile communication customers in Germany," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 192-203.
    15. Ferraro, Carla & Wheeler, Melissa A. & Pallant, Jason I. & Wilson, Samuel G. & Oldmeadow, Julian, 2023. "Not so trustless after all: Trust in Web3 technology and opportunities for brands," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 667-678.
    16. Mathieu Chevrier & Brice Corgnet & Eric Guerci & Julie Rosaz, 2024. "Algorithm Credulity: Human and Algorithmic Advice in Prediction Experiments," GREDEG Working Papers 2024-03, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    17. Abhishek Behl & Pankaj Dutta & Zongwei Luo & Pratima Sheorey, 2022. "Enabling artificial intelligence on a donation-based crowdfunding platform: a theoretical approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 761-789, December.
    18. Venkataiah Chittipaka & Satish Kumar & Uthayasankar Sivarajah & Jana Lay-Hwa Bowden & Manish Mohan Baral, 2023. "Blockchain Technology for Supply Chains operating in emerging markets: an empirical examination of technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 465-492, August.
    19. Shareef, Mahmud Akhter & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Kumar, Vinod & Kumar, Uma, 2017. "Content design of advertisement for consumer exposure: Mobile marketing through short messaging service," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 257-268.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:33:y:2013:i:3:p:567-582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.