IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v35y2025i1d10.1007_s12525-025-00803-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust and FinTech: A review and research agenda

Author

Listed:
  • James F. Devlin

    (University of the Free State
    Nottingham Business School)

  • Sanjit K. Roy

    (Edith Cowan University)

  • Harjit Sekhon

    (University of Wolverhampton Business School)

  • S M A Moin

    (School of Business and Management, Queen Mary, University of London)

  • Mehmet Sahiner

    (University of Dundee)

Abstract

The primary objective of this paper is to formulate a detailed research agenda focussed on trust in the context of FinTech. To achieve this objective, conceptualisations of trust and related constructs are reviewed, and a detailed model of trust is developed. The domain of FinTech is then introduced and is taken to include current and emerging innovations in financial services incorporating aspects of big data and AI, as well as open and decentralised finance and crypto assets. Typologies of FinTech services are also explored. Arguments concerning the importance of trust in financial services are then reviewed, along with prior studies of trust in the context of financial services. Nascent research into trust and FinTech is emerging, but many important questions remain, such as (a) to what degree are traditional definitions and conceptualisations of trust germane to aspects of FinTech and what adaptations or additional factors may be beneficial? (b) from both the trustor’s and trustee’s perspective, what are the relevant objects of dependence that form the focus of the trust relationship in the context of FinTech? (c) are views on the importance of trust consistent across elements of the FinTech domain including big data and AI and open, decentralised, and crypto finance? (d) how best to measure and evaluate levels of trust in FinTech? (e) what are the antecedents and consequences of trust in FinTech and other related questions? Thus, a comprehensive and nuanced exposition of trust and its impact in relation to the gamut of activities encompassed under the FinTech moniker would add significantly to collective understanding.

Suggested Citation

  • James F. Devlin & Sanjit K. Roy & Harjit Sekhon & S M A Moin & Mehmet Sahiner, 2025. "Trust and FinTech: A review and research agenda," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-025-00803-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-025-00803-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-025-00803-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-025-00803-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Langley & Andrew Leyshon, 2021. "The Platform Political Economy of FinTech: Reintermediation, Consolidation and Capitalisation," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 376-388, May.
    2. Sim B. Sitkin & Nancy L. Roth, 1993. "Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic “Remedies” for Trust/Distrust," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 367-392, August.
    3. Oliver Werth & Davinia Rodríguez Cardona & Albert Torno & Michael H. Breitner & Jan Muntermann, 2023. "What determines FinTech success?—A taxonomy-based analysis of FinTech success factors," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Wu, Kewen & Zhao, Yuxiang & Zhu, Qinghua & Tan, Xiaojie & Zheng, Hua, 2011. "A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 572-581.
    5. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    6. Arif Perdana & Pearpilai Jutasompakorn & Sunghun Chung, 2023. "Shaping crowdlending investors’ trust: Technological, social, and economic exchange perspectives," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Itay Goldstein & Wei Jiang & G Andrew Karolyi, 2019. "To FinTech and Beyond," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1647-1661.
    8. Rainer Alt & Roman Beck & Martin T. Smits, 2018. "FinTech and the transformation of the financial industry," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(3), pages 235-243, August.
    9. Williamson, Oliver E, 1993. "Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(1), pages 453-486, April.
    10. Felix B. Tan & Paul Sutherland, 2004. "Online Consumer Trust: A Multi-Dimensional Model," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 2(3), pages 40-58, July.
    11. Johnson, Devon & Grayson, Kent, 2005. "Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 500-507, April.
    12. Cynthia Weiyi Cai, 2018. "Disruption of financial intermediation by FinTech: a review on crowdfunding and blockchain," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(4), pages 965-992, December.
    13. Kowalski, Michał & Lee, Zach W.Y. & Chan, Tommy K.H., 2021. "Blockchain technology and trust relationships in trade finance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    14. Zack Jourdan & J. Ken. Corley & Randall Valentine & Arthur M. Tran, 2023. "Fintech: A content analysis of the finance and information systems literature," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Martin, Kirsten, 2018. "The penalty for privacy violations: How privacy violations impact trust online," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 103-116.
    16. J. Leon Zhao & Shaokun Fan & Jiaqi Yan, 2016. "Overview of business innovations and research opportunities in blockchain and introduction to the special issue," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-7, December.
    17. Jen Sheng Wang, 2021. "Exploring biometric identification in FinTech applications based on the modified TAM," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, December.
    18. David LEE Kuo Chuen & Ernie G.S. Teo, 2015. "Emergence of FinTech and the LASIC principles," Journal of Financial Perspectives, EY Global FS Institute, vol. 3(3), pages 24-36.
    19. Gregor Dorfleitner & Lars Hornuf & Julia Kreppmeier, 2023. "Promise not fulfilled: FinTech, data privacy, and the GDPR," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-29, December.
    20. Henner Gimpel & Daniel Rau & Maximilian Röglinger, 2018. "Understanding FinTech start-ups – a taxonomy of consumer-oriented service offerings," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(3), pages 245-264, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rainer Alt & Gilbert Fridgen & Younghoon Chang, 2024. "The future of fintech — Towards ubiquitous financial services," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Ali Raza & Turgut Tursoy, 2025. "Technology Acceptance Model and Fintech: An Evidence from Italian Banking Industry," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, Enero - M.
    3. Jan Schwiderowski & Asger Balle Pedersen & Jonas Kasper Jensen & Roman Beck, 2023. "Value creation and capture in decentralized finance markets: Non-fungible tokens as a class of digital assets," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Patrick Weber & K. Valerie Carl & Oliver Hinz, 2024. "Applications of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Finance—a systematic review of Finance, Information Systems, and Computer Science literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 867-907, June.
    5. Nalluri, Venkateswarlu & Chen, Long-Sheng, 2024. "Modelling the FinTech adoption barriers in the context of emerging economies—An integrated Fuzzy hybrid approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    6. Cheuk Hang Au & Kevin K. W. Ho & Kris. M. Y. Law & Dickson K. W. Chiu, 2024. "Critical success factors of users’ continuous intention of adopting cryptocurrency exchanges: LAS-VICT principle," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Luiz Antonio Joia & Rodrigo Proença, 2022. "The social representation of fintech from the perspective of traditional financial sector professionals: evidence from Brazil," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-27, December.
    8. Choudhary, Priya & Thenmozhi, M., 2024. "Fintech and financial sector: ADO analysis and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Dulani Jayasuriya Daluwathumullagamage & Alexandra Sims, 2021. "Fantastic Beasts: Blockchain Based Banking," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-43, April.
    10. Tony Simons, 2002. "Behavioral Integrity: The Perceived Alignment Between Managers' Words and Deeds as a Research Focus," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 18-35, February.
    11. Osama Sohaib & Kyeong Kang & Mohammad Nurunnabi, 2018. "Gender-Based iTrust in E-Commerce: The Moderating Role of Cognitive Innovativeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Jung Lee & Jae-Nam Lee & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2015. "Antecedents of cognitive trust and affective distrust and their mediating roles in building customer loyalty," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 159-175, February.
    13. Esther Calderon-Monge & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano, 2024. "The role of digitalization in business and management: a systematic literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 449-491, February.
    14. Sun, Yi & Jiang, Shiqing & Jia, Wanjiao & Wang, Yu, 2022. "Blockchain as a cutting-edge technology impacting business: A systematic literature review perspective," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10).
    15. Misani, Nicola, 2020. "Sustainability and Implicit Contracts," MPRA Paper 104963, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Pandey, Dharen Kumar & Hassan, M.Kabir & Kumari, Vineeta & Zaied, Younes Ben & Rai, Varun Kumar, 2024. "Mapping the landscape of FinTech in banking and finance: A bibliometric review," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    17. Dorota Krupa & Michał Buszko, 2023. "Age-dependent differences in using FinTech products and services—Young customers versus other adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-20, October.
    18. Maurizio Massaro & Andrea Moro & Ewald Aschauer & Matthias Fink, 2019. "Trust, control and knowledge transfer in small business networks," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 267-301, April.
    19. Akhil Bhardwaj & Anastasia Sergeeva, 2023. "Values‐based Trust as a Shift Parameter for Collective Organizing: The Case of Magnum Photos," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(8), pages 2022-2059, December.
    20. Kou, Mingting & Yang, Yuanqi & Chen, Kaihua, 2024. "Financial technology research: Past and future trajectories," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 162-181.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General
    • G50 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-025-00803-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.