IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijoais/v49y2023ics1467089522000604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A meta-analysis of factors affecting acceptance of information technology in auditing

Author

Listed:
  • Afsay, Akram
  • Tahriri, Arash
  • Rezaee, Zabihollah

Abstract

Technology advancements provide opportunities for auditors to use new tools in the audit process. This study presents a synthesis of technology-related auditing research to identify factors affecting the use of technology in auditing. We analyze 88 studies in identifying 21 factors relevant to technology acceptance in auditing based on country of origin (developed or developing), user type (external or internal), type of technology (traditional or advanced), firm size (Big 4 or non-Big 4), and publication time (before and after 2013). Our results show that the most important factors in accepting technology from an individual perspective are facilitator conditions, perceived usefulness, and understanding of ease of use. Technology acceptance factors relevant to an organizational perspective are cost-benefit technology, competitive pressure, company readiness, and matching technology-task. Results suggest that perceived usefulness and subjective norm are more important in developed countries and Big 4 audit firms, while auditors in developing countries and non-Big 4 audit firms are more influenced by perceived ease of use, facilitating conditions, and organizational factors. Adopting traditional technologies is also more influenced by understanding the ease of use, subjective norms, and top management support than advanced technologies. This study contributes to the literature by assessing technology acceptance factors in auditing and thus provides policy, practice, and research implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Afsay, Akram & Tahriri, Arash & Rezaee, Zabihollah, 2023. "A meta-analysis of factors affecting acceptance of information technology in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:49:y:2023:i:c:s1467089522000604
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089522000604
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100608?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dyah Paramita Budi Dharma & Puspa Indahati Sandhyaduhita & Ave Adriana Pinem & Achmad Nizar Hidayanto, 2017. "Antecedents of intention-to-use of e-audit system: a case of the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(2), pages 185-204.
    2. Aidi Ahmi & Simon Kent, 2013. "The utilisation of generalized audit software (GAS) by external auditors," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(2), pages 88-113, January.
    3. Wu, Kewen & Zhao, Yuxiang & Zhu, Qinghua & Tan, Xiaojie & Zheng, Hua, 2011. "A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 572-581.
    4. Rajiv Sabherwal & Anand Jeyaraj & Charles Chowa, 2006. "Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1849-1864, December.
    5. repec:eme:maj000:maj-10-2015-1247 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:eme:maj000:maj-01-2018-1773 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:eme:maj000:02686901311284522 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. George Salijeni & Anna Samsonova-Taddei & Stuart Turley, 2019. "Big Data and changes in audit technology: contemplating a research agenda," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 95-119, January.
    9. Curtis, Mary B. & Payne, Elizabeth A., 2008. "An examination of contextual factors and individual characteristics affecting technology implementation decisions in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 104-121.
    10. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    11. repec:eme:maj000:02686900510606092 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Kevin Zhu & Kenneth L. Kraemer, 2005. "Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 61-84, March.
    13. Tiberius, Victor & Hirth, Stefanie, 2019. "Impacts of digitization on auditing: A Delphi study for Germany," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    14. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    15. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Michael D. Williams, 2015. "A meta-analysis of existing research on citizen adoption of e-government," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 547-563, June.
    16. Mary B. Curtis & Elizabeth A. Payne, 2014. "Modeling voluntary CAAT utilization decisions in auditing," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 29(4), pages 304-326, April.
    17. Roger Debreceny & Sook‐Leng Lee & Willy Neo & Jocelyn Shuling Toh, 2005. "Employing generalized audit software in the financial services sector," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(6), pages 605-618, August.
    18. Choi, Jayoung & Geistfeld, Loren V., 2004. "A cross-cultural investigation of consumer e-shopping adoption," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 821-838, December.
    19. Kevin Zhu & Kenneth Kraemer & Sean Xu, 2003. "Electronic business adoption by European firms: a cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 251-268, December.
    20. Krieger, Felix & Drews, Paul & Velte, Patrick, 2021. "Explaining the (non-) adoption of advanced data analytics in auditing: A process theory," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    21. Rindang Widuri & Brendan O’Connell & Prem W.S. Yapa, 2016. "Adopting generalized audit software: an Indonesian perspective," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(8/9), pages 821-847, September.
    22. Robert L. Braun & Harold E. Davis, 2003. "Computer‐assisted audit tools and techniques: analysis and perspectives," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(9), pages 725-731, December.
    23. Luca Ferri & Rosanna Spanò & Gianluca Ginesti & Grigorios Theodosopoulos, 2020. "Ascertaining auditors’ intentions to use blockchain technology: evidence from the Big 4 accountancy firms in Italy," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(5), pages 1063-1087, November.
    24. repec:eme:maj000:maj-06-2013-0881 is not listed on IDEAS
    25. Hamed Taherdoost, 2018. "A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories," Post-Print hal-03741843, HAL.
    26. Rindang Widuri & Brendan O’Connell & Prem W.S. Yapa, 2016. "Adopting generalized audit software: an Indonesian perspective," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 31(8/9), pages 821-847, September.
    27. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    28. Nurmazilah Mahzan & Andy Lymer, 2014. "Examining the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques: Cases of generalized audit software use by internal auditors," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 29(4), pages 327-349, April.
    29. Siew, Eu-Gene & Rosli, Khairina & Yeow, Paul H.P., 2020. "Organizational and environmental influences in the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by audit firms in Malaysia," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    30. Mary B. Curtis & Elizabeth A. Payne, 2014. "Modeling voluntary CAAT utilization decisions in auditing," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(4), pages 304-326, April.
    31. Khairina Rosli & Eu-Gene Siew & Paul Yeow, 2016. "Technological, Organisational and Environmental Aspects of Audit Technology Acceptance," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(5), pages 140-140, April.
    32. Kim, Hyo-Jeong & Mannino, Michael & Nieschwietz, Robert J., 2009. "Information technology acceptance in the internal audit profession: Impact of technology features and complexity," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 214-228.
    33. repec:eme:maj000:maj-07-2013-0903 is not listed on IDEAS
    34. Miklos A. Vasarhelyi & Silvia Romero, 2014. "Technology in audit engagements: a case study," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 29(4), pages 350-365, April.
    35. repec:eme:maj000:02686900310500488 is not listed on IDEAS
    36. Nor Nadia Normahazan & Intan Salwani Mohamed & Nabilah Rozzani, 2020. "Drivers Contributing to the Implementation of Generalized Audit Software (GAS) within Audit Firms in Malaysia," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 341-354, June.
    37. Miklos A. Vasarhelyi & Silvia Romero, 2014. "Technology in audit engagements: a case study," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(4), pages 350-365, April.
    38. Lina Dagilienė & Lina Klovienė, 2019. "Motivation to use big data and big data analytics in external auditing," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(7), pages 750-782, June.
    39. Alles, Michael & Gray, Glen L., 2016. "Incorporating big data in audits: Identifying inhibitors and a research agenda to address those inhibitors," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 44-59.
    40. Hamari, Juho & Koivisto, Jonna, 2015. "Why do people use gamification services?," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 419-431.
    41. Diaz, Michelle Chandler & Loraas, Tina, 2010. "Learning new uses of technology while on an audit engagement: Contextualizing general models to advance pragmatic understanding," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 61-77.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmad Almagrashi & Abdulwahab Mujalli & Tehmina Khan & Osama Attia, 2023. "Factors determining internal auditors’ behavioral intention to use computer-assisted auditing techniques: an extension of the UTAUT model and an empirical study," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Abdalwali Lutfi & Hamza Alqudah, 2023. "The Influence of Technological Factors on the Computer-Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques Usage during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Siew, Eu-Gene & Rosli, Khairina & Yeow, Paul H.P., 2020. "Organizational and environmental influences in the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by audit firms in Malaysia," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    4. Krieger, Felix & Drews, Paul & Velte, Patrick, 2021. "Explaining the (non-) adoption of advanced data analytics in auditing: A process theory," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    5. Bierstaker, James & Janvrin, Diane & Lowe, D. Jordan, 2014. "What factors influence auditors' use of computer-assisted audit techniques?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 67-74.
    6. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana & Anand Jeyaraj & Marc Clement & Michael D. Williams, 2019. "Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 719-734, June.
    7. Hamari, Juho & Keronen, Lauri, 2017. "Why do people play games? A meta-analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 125-141.
    8. Farida Veerankutty & Thurasamy Ramayah & Noor Azman Ali, 2018. "Information Technology Governance on Audit Technology Performance among Malaysian Public Sector Auditors," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Ruhnke, Klaus, 2023. "Empirical research frameworks in a changing world: The case of audit data analytics," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    10. Hart O. Awa & Ojiabo Ukoha & Bartholomew C. Emecheta, 2016. "Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1196571-119, December.
    11. Alexandra Perju-Mitran & Daniela Zirra & George Căruţaşu & Alexandru Pîrjan & Justina-Lavinia Stănică, 2020. "Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to Assess the Intention to Use an Aftermarket eCall Based on 112 Device for Passenger Vehicles to Ensure Sustainable Rescue Operations on European Roads," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
    12. Dirsehan, Taşkın & Cankat, Ece, 2021. "Role of mobile food-ordering applications in developing restaurants’ brand satisfaction and loyalty in the pandemic period," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    13. Cao, XinYu & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2005. "The Intended and Actual Adoption of Online Purchasing: A Brief Review of Recent Literature," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt45q5p1vb, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. Ravi Seethamraju & Angela Hecimovic, 2023. "Adoption of artificial intelligence in auditing: An exploratory study," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(4), pages 780-800, November.
    15. Rahman Ummeh Habiba Faria Benteh & Zafar Muhammad Khubaib, 2020. "Factors Influencing Uber Adoption In Bangladesh And Pakistan," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 86-97, January.
    16. Allam, Hesham & Bliemel, Michael & Spiteri, Louise & Blustein, James & Ali-Hassan, Hossam, 2019. "Applying a multi-dimensional hedonic concept of intrinsic motivation on social tagging tools: A theoretical model and empirical validation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 211-222.
    17. Rahman Ummeh Habiba Faria Benteh & Zafar Muhammad Khubaib, 2020. "Factors Influencing Uber Adoption In Bangladesh And Pakistan," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 86-97, January.
    18. Misra, Aditi & Shirgaokar, Manish & Weinstein Agrawal, Asha & Dobbs, Bonnie & Wachs, Martin, 2022. "How older adults use Ride-hailing booking technology in California," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 11-30.
    19. Gonzalez, George C. & Sharma, Pratyush N. & Galletta, Dennis F., 2012. "The antecedents of the use of continuous auditing in the internal auditing context," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 248-262.
    20. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:49:y:2023:i:c:s1467089522000604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-accounting-information-systems/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.