IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05366347.html

The role of new technologies in improving financial audit quality following the financial scandals of the 2000s
[Le rôle des nouvelles technologies dans l’amélioration de la qualité de l’audit comptable et financier après les scandales financiers des années 2000]

Author

Listed:
  • Asmae Ez-Zaidi

    (National School of Business and Management – ENCG Settat, Hassan The First University, Settat, Morocco.)

  • Youssef Ghandari

    (National School of Business and Management – ENCG Settat, Hassan The First University, Settat, Morocco.)

Abstract

The financial scandals that erupted in the early 2000s prompted a profound re-evaluation of the quality of audits of listed companies' financial statements. The involvement of large audit firms in these cases demonstrated that an approach based on the sizeof the auditor is an insufficient measure of audit quality. This measurement approach considers that the competence and independence of the auditor are reliable substitutes for audit quality. However, it disregards the methods and tools used by the audit firm in its engagements. It is more appropriate to adopt an approach based on the audit process as an indicator of quality. This process has become increasingly complex as the volume of data processed has grown. It therefore requires the integration of high-performance technologies to carry out audit work in an effective and efficient manner. This article aims to analyze the impact of three major financial scandals (Enron, Vivendi and Parmalat) on audit quality. Through a thorough review of the literature, it highlights the foundations of the audit quality approach based on the audit process, comparing it with the traditional approach. It then presents the revolutionary technologies used in this process, namely CAAT, BDA and AI, while clarifying the theories that frame their implementation. It also outlines the advantages of these technologies, their risks and the challenges of their adoption. It examines the success of these tools in addressing the deterioration in audit quality following financial scandals, and proposes a research model linking their use to improvements in audit quality. These technologies, widely adopted by auditors in their work, have demonstrated high performance in terms of anomaly detection, accuracy and speed of execution of audit tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Asmae Ez-Zaidi & Youssef Ghandari, 2025. "The role of new technologies in improving financial audit quality following the financial scandals of the 2000s [Le rôle des nouvelles technologies dans l’amélioration de la qualité de l’audit comptable et financier après les scandales financiers ," Post-Print hal-05366347, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05366347
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17593848
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05366347v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05366347v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.17593848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramadhani Calocha & Eliada Herwiyanti, 2020. "Factors that affect audit quality," Journal of Contemporary Accounting, Master in Accounting Program, Faculty of Business & Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, vol. 2(1), pages 35-48.
    2. Kanyarat (Lek) Sanoran & Jomsurang Ruangprapun, 2023. "Initial Implementation of Data Analytics and Audit Process Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Rusmin Rusmin & John Evans, 2017. "Audit quality and audit report lag: case of Indonesian listed companies," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(2), pages 191-210, May.
    4. Ravi Seethamraju & Angela Hecimovic, 2023. "Adoption of artificial intelligence in auditing: An exploratory study," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(4), pages 780-800, November.
    5. Gompers, Paul A. & Mukharlyamov, Vladimir & Xuan, Yuhai, 2016. "The cost of friendship," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 626-644.
    6. Elie Cohen, 2005. "Le Nouvel âge du capitalisme : bulles, krachs et rebonds," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03568368, HAL.
    7. Li, Wei, 2025. "Audit Automation Process and Realization Path Analysis Based on Financial Technology," European Journal of Business, Economics & Management, Pinnacle Academic Press, vol. 1(2), pages 69-75.
    8. Quick, Reiner & Hohenfels, D., 2020. "Non-Audit Services and Audit Quality: Evidence from Germany," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 124764, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    9. Xianjie He & Jeffrey Pittman & Oliver Rui, 2016. "Reputational Implications for Partners After a Major Audit Failure: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(4), pages 703-722, November.
    10. Antti Fredriksson & Anila Kiran & Lasse Niemi, 2020. "Reputation Capital of Directorships and Demand for Audit Quality," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 901-926, October.
    11. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    12. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    13. Wafa Ben Khaled & Fatma Jemaa, 2015. "La prudence comme origine morale de pratiques organisationnelles émergentes," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(3), pages 93-108.
    14. Daniela Hohenfels & Reiner Quick, 2020. "Non-audit services and audit quality: evidence from Germany," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 959-1007, October.
    15. Nihel Chabrak & Russell Craig & Nabyla Daidj, 2016. "Nouveau riche, old guard, established elite : agency and the leadership of Vivendi Universal," Post-Print hal-01370671, HAL.
    16. Mohammed Muneerali Thottoli & Essia Ries Ahmed & K.V. Thomas, 2022. "Emerging technology and auditing practice: analysis for future directions," European Journal of Management Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(1), pages 99-119, June.
    17. P. V. Thayyib & Rajesh Mamilla & Mohsin Khan & Humaira Fatima & Mohd Asim & Imran Anwar & M. K. Shamsudheen & Mohd Asif Khan, 2023. "State-of-the-Art of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Analytics Reviews in Five Different Domains: A Bibliometric Summary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-38, February.
    18. repec:uii:jcauii:v:2:y:2020:i:1:p:35-48 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Bahram Soltani, 2014. "The Anatomy of Corporate Fraud: A Comparative Analysis of High Profile American and European Corporate Scandals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(2), pages 251-274, March.
    20. Francis, Jere R., 2004. "What do we know about audit quality?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 345-368.
    21. Siew, Eu-Gene & Rosli, Khairina & Yeow, Paul H.P., 2020. "Organizational and environmental influences in the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by audit firms in Malaysia," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    22. Mara Cameran & Annalisa Prencipe & Marco Trombetta, 2016. "Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 35-58, May.
    23. Reid, Colin D. & Youngman, Julie Furr, 2017. "New audit partner identification rules may offer opportunities and benefits," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 507-518.
    24. Tiberius, Victor & Hirth, Stefanie, 2019. "Impacts of digitization on auditing: A Delphi study for Germany," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    25. Nora Azima Noordin & Khaled Hussainey & Ahmad Faisal Hayek, 2022. "The Use of Artificial Intelligence and Audit Quality: An Analysis from the Perspectives of External Auditors in the UAE," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, July.
    26. Cédric Van Appelghem & Pascal Nguyen, 2021. "La proximité entre le dirigeant et les administrateurs a-t-elle un impact sur le coût des fonds propres ?," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 27(1), pages 111-158.
    27. Ennio Lugli & Federico Bertacchini, 2022. "Audit quality and digitalization: some insights from theItalian context," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(4), pages 841-860, March.
    28. Eugenia Carisa & Evelyn Nadia Tedjosugondo & Armanto Witjaksono, 2024. "Future auditing: Machine learning's impact on audit capacity stress - young auditors' perceptions using UTAUT," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 8(6), pages 4427-4446.
    29. Jere R. Francis, 2024. "What exactly do we mean by audit quality?," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 123-133, May.
    30. Afsay, Akram & Tahriri, Arash & Rezaee, Zabihollah, 2023. "A meta-analysis of factors affecting acceptance of information technology in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    31. Maria Ishaque, 2021. "Managing Conflict of Interests in Professional Accounting Firms: A Research Synthesis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 537-555, March.
    32. Titman, Sheridan & Trueman, Brett, 1986. "Information quality and the valuation of new issues," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 159-172, June.
    33. Simunic, Da, 1984. "Auditing, Consulting, And Auditor Independence," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 679-702.
    34. Ahmed Almgrashi & Abdulwahab Mujalli & Tehmina Khan & Osama Attia, 2023. "Factors determining internal auditors’ behavioral intention to use computer-assisted auditing techniques: an extension of the UTAUT model and an empirical study," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    35. Steven Toms, 2019. "Financial scandals: a historical overview," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(5), pages 477-499, July.
    36. Bahram Soltani, 2014. "The Anatomy of Corporate Fraud: A Comparative Analysis of High Profile American and European Corporate Scandals," Post-Print hal-03970654, HAL.
    37. Mirela Mihai & Adriana Dutescu, 2024. "TOE framework elements used on Artificial Intelligence implementation in the accounting and audit sector," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 13(4), pages 335-349, June.
    38. Ida Merete Enholm & Emmanouil Papagiannidis & Patrick Mikalef & John Krogstie, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence and Business Value: a Literature Review," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1709-1734, October.
    39. Jenni Kallunki & Juha‐Pekka Kallunki & Lasse Niemi & Henrik Nilsson & Daniel Aobdia, 2019. "IQ and Audit Quality: Do Smarter Auditors Deliver Better Audits?†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 1373-1416, September.
    40. Elie Cohen, 2005. "Le Nouvel âge du capitalisme : bulles, krachs et rebonds," Post-Print hal-03568368, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hideaki Sakawa & Naoki Watanabel, 2022. "Correction to: Accounting Frauds and Main-Bank Monitoring in Japanese Corporations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 623-623, October.
    2. Alastair Marais, 2024. "Audit Quality and Financial Statement Manipulation: The Moderating Effect of Tone at the Top," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 220-232, September.
    3. Lin, Z. Jun & Liu, Ming, 2009. "The impact of corporate governance on auditor choice: Evidence from China," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 44-59.
    4. Alhababsah, Salem & Alhaj-Ismail, Alaa, 2023. "Does shared tenure between audit committee chair and engagement partner affect audit outcomes? Evidence from the UK," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    5. Liu, Zihan & Jubb, Christine & Abhayawansa, Subhash, 2025. "Choice of financial audit firm and ESG assurance firm: The role of board of director characteristics," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(4).
    6. Amahalu Nestor Ndubuisi & Beatrice O. Ezechukwu, 2017. "Determinants of Audit Quality: Evidence from Deposit Money Banks Listed on Nigeria Stock Exchange," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 7(2), pages 117-130, April.
    7. Datta, Sudip & Gruskin, Mark & Iskandar-Datta, Mai, 2024. "Auditor certification and long-run performance of IPO stocks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    8. Florio, Cristina, 2024. "A structured literature review of empirical research on mandatory auditor rotation," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    9. Alhababsah, Salem, 2019. "Ownership structure and audit quality: An empirical analysis considering ownership types in Jordan," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 71-84.
    10. Elisabeth Dedman & Asad Kausar & Clive Lennox, 2014. "The Demand for Audit in Private Firms: Recent Large-Sample Evidence from the UK," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Xingqiang Du, 2019. "Does CEO-Auditor Dialect Sharing Impair Pre-IPO Audit Quality? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 699-735, May.
    12. Sang Cheol Lee & Mooweon Rhee & Jongchul Yoon, 2018. "Foreign Monitoring and Audit Quality: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Steve Fortin & Ahmad Hammami & Michel Magnan, 2021. "Re‐exploring Fair Value Accounting and Value Relevance: An Examination of Underlying Securities," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(2), pages 220-250, June.
    14. Alain Gilles FOKA TAGNE & Prince Dubois KENFACK HIKOUATCHA & Joséphine Florentine MBADUET & Joseph NDASSI YEPGNOU, 2018. "Qualité d’audit, concentration de l’actionnariat et reporting financier," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 9(1), pages 27-54, June.
    15. Sarhan, Ahmed A. & Ntim, Collins G. & Al-Najjar, Basil, 2019. "Antecedents of audit quality in MENA countries: The effect of firm- and country-level governance quality," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 85-107.
    16. Mahdi Salehi & Ali Mansoury, 2009. "Firm Size, Audit Regulation and Fraud Detection: Empirical Evidence from Iran," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 4(1), pages 5-19.
    17. Shokrollah Khajavi & Akbar Zare, 2016. "The Effect of Audit Quality on Stock Crash Risk in Tehran Stock Exchange," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(1), pages 20-25.
    18. Manel Jmal Derbel & Mohamed Ali Boujelbene, 2015. "La Conformite Comptabilite-Fiscalite Et La Gestion Des Resultats : Cas Des Entreprises Tunisiennes," Post-Print hal-01188533, HAL.
    19. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:450-461 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1073 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. van Lent, L.A.G.M., 1999. "Incomplete contracting theory in empirical accounting research," Other publications TiSEM 088f797d-9fa4-4081-98f4-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    22. Timothy B. Bell & Monika Causholli & W. Robert Knechel, 2015. "Audit Firm Tenure, Non‐Audit Services, and Internal Assessments of Audit Quality," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 53(3), pages 461-509, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05366347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.