IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v91y2009isupplement1ps3-s14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Progress in Tobacco Control

Author

Listed:
  • Clancy, Luke

Abstract

Aim To present the Tobacco Control interventions which are currently accepted as effective.Methods Review the available regulatory strategy laid down in the Framework Convention for Tobacco Control and explore the basis for the Treaty and the appropriateness of the response with particular reference to Europe.Results An evidence-based approach was built up over some sixty years. At first a slow revelation of the catastrophic health effects of smoking is revealed. Then a reluctance to see tobacco addiction as a disease or even as an addiction delays attempts to develop active treatments. A powerful, corrupt industry demanding to be treated as normal delays effective interventions to control demand or supply.Discussion The pace of Tobacco Control is too slow. An effective FCTC would still see millions of unnecessary premature deaths in this century. Most deaths will not be in the west where the true effects of this industry are accepted and where mechanisms to combat the worst abuses of industrial power exist. They will occur in the developing world. The FCTC provisions must be achieved and then some. It would be foolish to rely on it alone especially on its approach to control of supply. The role of the treatment of tobacco dependence may be underrated in Tobacco Control. In many other diseases, whether infections such as tuberculosis or lifestyle related such as hypertension, the role and availability of effective treatments often provides the catalyst to drive the social changes necessary to lead to commitment to effective change.

Suggested Citation

  • Clancy, Luke, 2009. "Progress in Tobacco Control," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(Supplemen), pages 3-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:91:y:2009:i:supplement1:p:s3-s14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(09)70003-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chapman, S. & Borland, R. & Scollo, M. & Brownson, R.C. & Dominello, A. & Woodward, S., 1999. "The impact of smoke-free workplaces on declining cigarette consumption in Australia and the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(7), pages 1018-1023.
    2. Unknown, 2007. "The Scientific Basis of Tobacco Product Regulation: Report of a WHO Study Group," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt4bx2m81n, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    3. Remler, D.K., 2004. "Poor Smokers, Poor Quitters, and Cigarette Tax Regressivity," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(2), pages 225-229.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregory J. Colman & Dahlia K. Remler, 2008. "Vertical equity consequences of very high cigarette tax increases: If the poor are the ones smoking, how could cigarette tax increases be progressive?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 376-400.
    2. Jody Sindelar & Elizabeth Beasley, 2014. "Helping People help themselves," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03393006, HAL.
    3. Boronina, Alena & Zemlyakov, Dmitriy & Maximov, Maxim & Minchenkova, Olga, 2014. "Analysis and Evaluation of the Competitiveness of Domestic Industries in the Global and Regional Economic Unions and Organizations," Published Papers r90229, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    4. Galinato, Gregmar I. & Olanie, Aaron Z. & Yoder, Jonathan K., 2017. "The Trade and Health Effects of Tobacco Regulations," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 42(3), September.
    5. Carpenter, Christopher S. & Sansone, Dario, 2021. "Cigarette taxes and smoking among sexual minority adults," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Reiner Hanewinkel & Christian Radden & Tobias Rosenkranz, 2008. "Price increase causes fewer sales of factory‐made cigarettes and higher sales of cheaper loose tobacco in Germany," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(6), pages 683-693, June.
    7. Kenchington, David G. & Shohfi, Thomas D. & Smith, Jared D. & White, Roger M., 2022. "Do sin tax hikes spur cheating in interpersonal exchange?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Silvia Tiezzi & Stefano F. Verde, 2019. "The signaling effect of gasoline taxes and its distributional implications," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 17(2), pages 145-169, June.
    9. Hermann Pythagore Pierre Donfouet & Shukri F. Mohamed & Eric Malin, 2021. "Socioeconomic inequality in tobacco use in Kenya: a concentration analysis," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 247-269, June.
    10. Rus'an Nasrudin & Ledi Trialdi & Djoni Hartono & Abdillah Ahsan, 2013. "Tobacco Economic of Indonesia: Poor Households' Spending Pattern, Tax Regressivity and Economic Wide Impact of Cigarette Excise Tax Simplification," Working Papers in Economics and Business 201302, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, revised Mar 2013.
    11. Otálvaro, Susana & Gallego, Juan Miguel & Rodríguez-Lesmes, Paul, 2023. "De-normalizing smoking in urban areas: Public smoking bans and smoking prevalence," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    12. Qin, Ping. & Chen, Peilin. & Zhang, Xiao-Bing. & Xie, Lunyu., 2020. "Coal taxation reform in China and its distributional effects on residential consumers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    13. Roger Wilkins & David Black & Hielke Buddelmeyer, 2005. "The Effects of Smoking Ban Regulations on Individual Smoking Rates," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2005n13, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    14. Giovanni Immordino & Anna Maria C. Menichini & Maria Grazia Romano, 2020. "Taxing and Regulating Vices," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 122(2), pages 622-647, April.
    15. Stéphan Marette & Vincent Réquillart, 2020. "Dietary models and challenges for economics," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 5-22, October.
    16. Wilson, Nick & Thomson, George, 2005. "Tobacco taxation and public health: ethical problems, policy responses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 649-659, August.
    17. Silvia Tiezzi & Stefano F. Verde, 2019. "The signaling effect of gasoline taxes and its distributional implications," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 17(2), pages 145-169, June.
    18. Martin Gonzalez-Rozada, 2019. "Increasing Cigarette Taxes is Unfair to the Poor? Evidence from Argentina," Department of Economics Working Papers 2019_01, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.
    19. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/4uiq68npjd9flr4655mc8spfkn is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Sharon Lawn & Jonathan Campion, 2013. "Achieving Smoke-Free Mental Health Services: Lessons from the Past Decade of Implementation Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    21. Robert Kaestner & Kevin Callison, 2018. "An Assessment of the Forward‐Looking Hypothesis of the Demand for Cigarettes," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(1), pages 48-70, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:91:y:2009:i:supplement1:p:s3-s14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.