IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v181y2025ics1389934125002424.html

Mapping the research of Forest ecosystem Services in Europe: A review

Author

Listed:
  • Truffer, Oliver
  • Lieberherr, Eva
  • Van Ruymbeke, Kato
  • Chimisso, Costanza
  • Rowe, Tim
  • Vranken, Liesbet
  • Ohmura, Tamaki

Abstract

Research on forest ecosystems is abundant, yet the societal needs for forest ecosystem services (FES) remains less examined. Understanding these needs—especially across different societal actors—offers a promising path to ease pressure on the provision of forest ecosystem services and navigate the goal conflicts of forest policy under the EU Green Deal. Using a semi-systematic literature review, we categorize the existing research on the need for forest ecosystem services within distinct European forestry paradigms and investigate how well the literature covers each service and actor type. In 107 assessed articles, we find that cultural ecosystem services are researched most prominently while provisioning services are addressed the least. While the literature in our corpus is inclined towards recreationists and the public, crucial actors such as forest owners or forest managers are examined seldomly. Furthermore, we find several articles that assess the synergies and conflicts fostered by different management approaches. We connect this finding to a qualitative mismatch between the need for forest ecosystem services described in the literature and the provision of these services that is shaped by different ideas on sustainable forest management. By highlighting gaps and shortcomings in the literature we set the stage for future research on the need for forest ecosystem services.

Suggested Citation

  • Truffer, Oliver & Lieberherr, Eva & Van Ruymbeke, Kato & Chimisso, Costanza & Rowe, Tim & Vranken, Liesbet & Ohmura, Tamaki, 2025. "Mapping the research of Forest ecosystem Services in Europe: A review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:181:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125002424
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125002424
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103663?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:181:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125002424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.