IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v87y2026ics1544612325023694.html

When protection backfires: How short selling bans weaken market resiliency

Author

Listed:
  • Félez-Viñas, Ester

Abstract

This paper studies how short selling bans affect market resiliency, defined as the ability of securities to recover from liquidity shocks. Using high-frequency limit order book data, I show that resiliency deteriorates following the ban: bid–ask spreads and market depth take significantly longer to revert to normal levels, with effects persisting for the duration of the bans. The evidence suggests that restrictions expel informal liquidity providers, reducing competition in liquidity supply. Although short selling bans are often imposed to stabilize markets, including during the COVID-19 crisis, the results quantify a market quality cost—slower liquidity recovery—that policymakers should weight against potential stability benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Félez-Viñas, Ester, 2026. "When protection backfires: How short selling bans weaken market resiliency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:87:y:2026:i:c:s1544612325023694
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.109120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325023694
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.109120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:87:y:2026:i:c:s1544612325023694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.