IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v86y2025ipds1544612325019233.html

How does climate policy uncertainty affect the uncertainty of stock returns of industrial enterprises in typical policy markets? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Zexia
  • Sun, Licheng

Abstract

This study used data from Chinese industrial enterprises from 2007 to 2024 as its sample. It finds that climate policy uncertainty leads to uncertainty in the stock return rates of Chinese industrial enterprises. This conclusion remains robust after testing using methods such as the Generalized Causal Forest. Among these, equity pledges serve as a transmission mechanism, while operational fluctuations play a masking effect. Heterogeneity tests reveal that for firms with lower managerial ownership and those under government scrutiny, climate policy uncertainty has a more pronounced promotional effect on stock return uncertainty. This study expands the boundaries of the new institutionalism theory. Furthermore, suggestions were made to adjust the uncertainty of stock returns from the perspective of aligning the interests of managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Zexia & Sun, Licheng, 2025. "How does climate policy uncertainty affect the uncertainty of stock returns of industrial enterprises in typical policy markets? Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PD).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:86:y:2025:i:pd:s1544612325019233
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.108669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325019233
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:86:y:2025:i:pd:s1544612325019233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.