IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v340y2025ics0360544225048807.html

Quantifying the impact of climate policy uncertainty on integrated energy resilience in Chinese cities

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Jun
  • Lei, Yalin
  • Zhao, Xiaomeng
  • Sun, Xiaojun

Abstract

With the gradual increasing concern about climate risks, few have paid attention to its potential role in integrated energy resilience. This study, thus, empirically examines the impact of the uncertainty of climate policy (UCP) on the energy resilience using panel data from 286 Chinese cities (2010–2019). The findings reveal that: (i) a 1 % increase in UCP is associated with a 0.897 % growth in urban IER; this implies that the uncertainty of climate policy substantially enhances urban energy resilience by improving the robustness and adaptability of energy systems (ii) three key mechanisms (i.e., energy technology innovation, energy supply diversification, and industrial transition acceleration); are identified. And (iii) the uncertainty of climate policy's positive effect on energy resilience is particularly evident in non-first-tier cities, mature and non-resource-based cities, Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta, middle reaches of the Yangtze River Delta, and non-capital cities, while being insignificant in other city types. Based on these findings, targeted policy recommendations are proposed to enhance energy resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Jun & Lei, Yalin & Zhao, Xiaomeng & Sun, Xiaojun, 2025. "Quantifying the impact of climate policy uncertainty on integrated energy resilience in Chinese cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:340:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225048807
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.139238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225048807
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.139238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:340:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225048807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.