IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v93y2024ics1057521924001467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does a consistently capitalized R&D ratio improve information effects of capitalized development expenditures?

Author

Listed:
  • Cho, Joe (Joonghi)
  • Kim, Heejung

Abstract

This study examines whether a consistently capitalized R&D ratio provides value relevant information that is faithfully represented to investors. Given that R&D investment generally remains stable over time to create sustainable competitive advantages, we posit that a high consistency in the R&D capitalization ratio represents less bias and lower error in the accounting choice of R&D expenditures. To measure the extent of consistency, we use the coefficient of variation of a firm-level ratio of capitalized development costs to total R&D expenditures over five consecutive years. Using a sample of publicly listed Korean firms from 2003 to 2019, we find that capitalized development expenditures are value relevant only for firms with a high level of consistency in their capitalization ratios. Moreover, stable R&D capitalization ratios also allow stock returns to better reflect more information about future earnings. Finally, we observe that the positive effect of consistent capitalization ratios on the value relevance of capitalized development expenditures and informativeness of stock prices becomes more pronounced after the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Overall, our findings suggest that maintaining a stable R&D capitalization ratio conveys value relevant financial information to the market, thus improving the quality of accounting information for investors by representing the economic reality of R&D activities faithfully.

Suggested Citation

  • Cho, Joe (Joonghi) & Kim, Heejung, 2024. "Does a consistently capitalized R&D ratio improve information effects of capitalized development expenditures?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:93:y:2024:i:c:s1057521924001467
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924001467
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    R&D expenditures; Capitalization; Consistency; Value relevance; Faithful representation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:93:y:2024:i:c:s1057521924001467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.