IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v90y2023ics1057521923004155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does better firm information disclosure enhance institutional blockholder monitoring on information asymmetry? Evidence from 10-K readability

Author

Listed:
  • Choi, Wonseok
  • Chung, Chune Young

Abstract

Using the Plain Writing Act of October 2010 as a source of exogenous variation in 10-K readability, we examine whether improvements in 10-K reports enhance institutional investor monitoring of firms' information environments. This study reveals that the negative association between institutional monitoring and information asymmetry is more robust when firms provide 10-K reports with enhanced readability. Since the implementation of the Act, the impact of improved readability on the relationship between institutional monitoring and information asymmetry has become increasingly pronounced. This finding confirms our hypothesis that improved readability provides better firm information for institutional investor monitoring of firms, thus decreasing information asymmetry.

Suggested Citation

  • Choi, Wonseok & Chung, Chune Young, 2023. "Does better firm information disclosure enhance institutional blockholder monitoring on information asymmetry? Evidence from 10-K readability," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s1057521923004155
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521923004155
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    10-K report readability; Institutional monitoring; Information asymmetry; Plain writing act;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:90:y:2023:i:c:s1057521923004155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.