IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v22y1999i3p363-372.html

Involving program stakeholders in reviews of evaluators' recommendations for program revisions

Author

Listed:
  • Brandon, Paul R.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Brandon, Paul R., 1999. "Involving program stakeholders in reviews of evaluators' recommendations for program revisions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 363-372, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:22:y:1999:i:3:p:363-372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149-7189(99)00030-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayers, Toby Diane, 1987. "Stakeholders as partners in evaluation: A stakeholder-collaborative approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 263-271, January.
    2. Trochim, William M. K. & Linton, Rhoda, 1986. "Conceptualization for planning and evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 289-308, January.
    3. D. Royce Sadler, 1984. "Evaluation and the Logic of Recommendations," Evaluation Review, , vol. 8(2), pages 261-268, April.
    4. Hendricks, Michael & Handley, Elisabeth A., 1990. "Improving the recommendations from evaluation studies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 109-117, January.
    5. Brandon, Paul R. & Newton, Barbara J. & Harman, James W., 1993. "Enhancing validity through beneficiaries' equitable involvement in identifying and prioritizing homeless children's educational problems," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 287-293.
    6. Melvin M. Mark & R. Lance Shotland, 1985. "Stakeholder-Based Evaluation and Value Judgments," Evaluation Review, , vol. 9(5), pages 605-626, October.
    7. Greene, Jennifer C., 1987. "Stakeholder participation in evaluation design: Is it worth the effort?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 379-394, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bouchard, Chantal & Hamel, Marie-Claude, 2023. "The extent to which the recommendations issued after the periodic evaluation of university programs are targeted, specific, measurable and unequivocal: An exploratory analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Tri Minh Ha & Phuc Van Nguyen, 2017. "Factors Affecting Evaluation Influence in the Public Sector of Cam Lo District, Vietnam," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 309-318.
    3. Tang, Hui-Wen Vivian, 2011. "Optimizing an immersion ESL curriculum using analytic hierarchy process," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 343-352, November.
    4. Toal, Stacie A. & King, Jean A. & Johnson, Kelli & Lawrenz, Frances, 2009. "The unique character of involvement in multi-site evaluation settings," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 91-98, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Unruh, Deanne, 2005. "Using primary and secondary stakeholders to define facility-to-community transition needs for adjudicated youth with disabilities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 413-422, November.
    2. Mercier, Celine, 1997. "Participation in stakeholder-based evaluation: A case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 467-475, November.
    3. Toal, Stacie A. & King, Jean A. & Johnson, Kelli & Lawrenz, Frances, 2009. "The unique character of involvement in multi-site evaluation settings," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 91-98, May.
    4. Daigneault, Pierre-Marc, 2014. "Taking stock of four decades of quantitative research on stakeholder participation and evaluation use: A systematic map," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 171-181.
    5. Papineau, Danielle & Kiely, Margaret C., 1996. "Participatory evaluation in a community organization: Fostering stakeholder empowerment and utilization," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 79-93, February.
    6. Nichols, Laura, 2002. "Participatory program planning: including program participants and evaluators," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 1-14, February.
    7. Reavley, Nicola & Livingston, Jenni & Buchbinder, Rachelle & Bennell, Kim & Stecki, Chris & Osborne, Richard Harry, 2010. "A systematic grounded approach to the development of complex interventions: The Australian WorkHealth Program - Arthritis as a case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 342-350, February.
    8. López-González, A. & Domenech, B. & Ferrer-Martí, L., 2018. "Formative evaluation of sustainability in rural electrification programs from a management perspective: A case study from Venezuela," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 95-109.
    9. Urban, Jennifer Brown & Hargraves, Monica & Trochim, William M., 2014. "Evolutionary Evaluation: Implications for evaluators, researchers, practitioners, funders and the evidence-based program mandate," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 127-139.
    10. Dan Durning, 1993. "Participatory policy analysis in a social service agency: A case study," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(2), pages 297-322.
    11. Crunkilton, Dhira D., 2009. "Staff and client perspectives on the Journey Mapping online evaluation tool in a drug court program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 119-128, May.
    12. Scott R. Rosas, 2017. "Group concept mapping methodology: toward an epistemology of group conceptualization, complexity, and emergence," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1403-1416, May.
    13. Olsen, Odd Einar & Lindoe, Preben, 2004. "Trailing research based evaluation; phases and roles," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 371-380, November.
    14. Luis Miranda-Gumucio & Ignacio Gil-Pechuán & Daniel Palacios-Marqués, 2013. "An exploratory study of the determinants of switching and loyalty in prepaid cell phone users. An application of concept mapping," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 7(4), pages 603-622, December.
    15. Mathie, Alison & Greene, Jennifer C., 1997. "Stakeholder participation in evaluation: How important is diversity?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 279-285, August.
    16. Michalski, Greg V. & Cousins, J. Bradley, 2000. "Differences in stakeholder perceptions about training evaluation: a concept mapping/pattern matching investigation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 211-230, May.
    17. Trochim, William M., 2017. "Hindsight is 20/20: Reflections on the evolution of concept mapping," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 176-185.
    18. Independent Evaluation Group, 2011. "Self-evaluation of the Independent Evaluation Group," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 16671, April.
    19. McLinden, Daniel, 2017. "And then the internet happened: Thoughts on the future of concept mapping," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 293-300.
    20. Rosas, Scott R. & Ridings, John W., 2017. "The use of concept mapping in measurement development and evaluation: Application and future directions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 265-276.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:22:y:1999:i:3:p:363-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.