IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v111y2025ics0149718925000266.html

Co-constructing educational innovations for an uncertain future: Design thinking and developmental evaluation in the school reform process

Author

Listed:
  • Kurucz, Elizabeth
  • Spencer-Mueller, Emily Krysten
  • Hands, Catherine
  • Gudz, Nadine
  • Archer, Karin

Abstract

This qualitative research examines the question: In what ways does a developmental evaluation of a STEM program co-developed through a design thinking process illuminate program goal attainment? Students, parents, teachers, high school staff, school district administrators, advisory committee members, community, and college and university partners in a southern Ontario region participated in a collective effort to develop an innovative approach to STEM education in the context of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, collaboratively prototyping the concept in a design workshop, and further refining it with diverse stakeholders. Collaborators co-constructed a developmental evaluation framework to continuously learn from experimentation toward program goals. Data sources include participant observation, field notes, interviews, and document analysis. Findings highlight program strengths needed to sustain it, and challenges that threaten its longevity. The paper concludes with a program assessment based on its intended impacts and opportunities to scale a design thinking approach in education to other jurisdictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurucz, Elizabeth & Spencer-Mueller, Emily Krysten & Hands, Catherine & Gudz, Nadine & Archer, Karin, 2025. "Co-constructing educational innovations for an uncertain future: Design thinking and developmental evaluation in the school reform process," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000266
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000266
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102559?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abigail Oxley Green & Lynsey Hunton‐Clarke, 2003. "A typology of stakeholder participation for company environmental decision‐making," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 292-299, September.
    2. Tsan Sheng Ng & Shuming Wang, 2017. "Recycling systems design using reservation incentive data," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1236-1258, October.
    3. Di Wu & Shuxia Ren & Xiuyan Pang, 2017. "Curriculum Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Chemical," Research Journal of Education, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 3(10), pages 116-127, 10-2017.
    4. Christine Noweski & Andrea Scheer & Nadja Büttner & Julia Thienen & Johannes Erdmann & Christoph Meinel, 2012. "Towards a Paradigm Shift in Education Practice: Developing Twenty-First Century Skills with Design Thinking," Understanding Innovation, in: Hasso Plattner & Christoph Meinel & Larry Leifer (ed.), Design Thinking Research, edition 127, pages 71-94, Springer.
    5. Daniel R.A. Schallmo, 2017. "Design Thinking erfolgreich anwenden," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-658-12523-3, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fontecha, John E. & Nikolaev, Alexander & Walteros, Jose L. & Zhu, Zhenduo, 2022. "Scientists wanted? A literature review on incentive programs that promote pro-environmental consumer behavior: Energy, waste, and water," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    2. Céline Bérard & L.M., Cloutier & Luc Cassivi, 2017. "The effects of using system dynamics-based decision support models: testing policy-makers’ boundaries in a complex situation," Post-Print hal-02128255, HAL.
    3. Youbin KANG, 2021. "The rise, demise and replacement of the Bangladesh experiment in transnational labour regulation," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 160(3), pages 407-430, September.
    4. Céline Bérard, 2013. "Les démarches participatives en matière de politiques publiques : le cas de la propriété intellectuelle des innovations biotechnologiques," Post-Print halshs-00987945, HAL.
    5. Shubashini Rathina Velu, 2022. "Design Thinking Approach for Increasing Innovative Action in Universities: ICT’s Mediating Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Ardion D. Beldad & Colin T. Seijdel & Menno D. T. Jong, 2020. "Managing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Together: The Effects of Stakeholder Participation and Third-Party Organization (TPO) Endorsement on CSR Initiative Effectiveness," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(4), pages 225-240, November.
    7. Andrew S. Mitchell, 2021. "Rethinking theories of change in the light of enactive cognitive science: Contributions to community‐scale local sustainability initiatives," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 448-458, August.
    8. Hasan, Md Mahmudul & Faiz, Tasnim Ibn & Modestino, Alicia Sasser & Young, Gary J. & Noor-E-Alam, Md, 2023. "Optimizing return and secure disposal of prescription opioids to reduce the diversion to secondary users and black market," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    9. Jingjing Li & Xianming Wu, 2022. "Technology-Driven Cross-Border M&A, CSR, and Enterprise Innovation Performance—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-32, March.
    10. Korapin Jirapong & Karina Cagarman & Laura von Arnim, 2021. "Road to Sustainability: University–Start-Up Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Samuel Adomako & Mai Dong Tran, 2022. "Stakeholder management, CSR commitment, corporate social performance: The moderating role of uncertainty in CSR regulation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1414-1423, September.
    12. Céline Bérard & Martin Cloutier L. & Luc Cassivi, 2017. "The effects of using system dynamics-based decision support models: testing policy-makers’ boundaries in a complex situation," Post-Print halshs-01666605, HAL.
    13. Annesi, Nora & Battaglia, Massimo & Frey, Marco, 2021. "Stakeholder engagement by an Italian water utility company: Insight from participant observation of dialogism," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    14. Aubert, Alice H. & Lienert, Judit, 2024. "Operational Research for, with, and by citizens: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 800-814.
    15. Giorgos Somarakis & Anastasia Stratigea, 2014. "Public Involvement in Taking Legislative Action as to the Spatial Development of the Tourist Sector in Greece—The “OpenGov” Platform Experience," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-25, November.
    16. Richard Parsons & Aleta Lederwasch & Kieren Moffat, 2013. "Clermont Preferred Future: Stakeholder Reflections on a Community Foresight and Planning Initiative," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-27, October.
    17. Tiina Onkila, 2011. "Multiple forms of stakeholder interaction in environmental management: business arguments regarding differences in stakeholder relationships," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(6), pages 379-393, September.
    18. Hilke Elke Jacke Bos‐Brouwers, 2010. "Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(7), pages 417-435, November.
    19. Maryam Jamilah Asha’ari & Salina Daud & Norazah Mohd Suki, 2023. "Linking Sustainable Design and Social Sustainability Performance of Chemical Manufacturing Firms: Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Danso, Albert & Adomako, Samuel & Lartey, Theophilus & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Owusu-Yirenkyi, Diana, 2020. "Stakeholder integration, environmental sustainability orientation and financial performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 652-662.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.