IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v111y2025ics0149718925000266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-constructing educational innovations for an uncertain future: Design thinking and developmental evaluation in the school reform process

Author

Listed:
  • Kurucz, Elizabeth
  • Spencer-Mueller, Emily Krysten
  • Hands, Catherine
  • Gudz, Nadine
  • Archer, Karin

Abstract

This qualitative research examines the question: In what ways does a developmental evaluation of a STEM program co-developed through a design thinking process illuminate program goal attainment? Students, parents, teachers, high school staff, school district administrators, advisory committee members, community, and college and university partners in a southern Ontario region participated in a collective effort to develop an innovative approach to STEM education in the context of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, collaboratively prototyping the concept in a design workshop, and further refining it with diverse stakeholders. Collaborators co-constructed a developmental evaluation framework to continuously learn from experimentation toward program goals. Data sources include participant observation, field notes, interviews, and document analysis. Findings highlight program strengths needed to sustain it, and challenges that threaten its longevity. The paper concludes with a program assessment based on its intended impacts and opportunities to scale a design thinking approach in education to other jurisdictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurucz, Elizabeth & Spencer-Mueller, Emily Krysten & Hands, Catherine & Gudz, Nadine & Archer, Karin, 2025. "Co-constructing educational innovations for an uncertain future: Design thinking and developmental evaluation in the school reform process," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000266
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000266
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102559?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.