IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v322y2025ics0360544225013350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equipment capacity matching methodology and techno-economic analysis for a novel low-carbon multi-energy system with the integration of oxy-coal combustion power plant and power-to-gas

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yuting
  • Zhou, Yuegui

Abstract

Oxy-fuel combustion (OFC) is a promising technology for CO2 capture, utilization and storage (CCUS), but the high energy consumption of oxygen generation limits its application. Power-to-Gas (PtG) allows to use excess production from wind or solar power, and thus enables capabilities to balance fluctuations from renewable energy generation, but requires CO2 as a synthetic feedstock and produces large amounts of byproduct oxygen. Integration of the two technologies can reduce the energy consumption of the OFC for oxygen production and provide CO2 for PtG, improving their techno-economics. A low-carbon multi-energy system with the integration of PtG and oxy-coal combustion power plant was first proposed to make full use of byproduct oxygen for oxy-coal combustion boiler (OCCB) from green hydrogen production of water electrolysis and to synthesize renewable fuels from green hydrogen and captured CO2. And then the capacity matching methodology of the main components was proposed to achieve multi-energy gradient utilization of electricity, heat and synthetic fuel chemical energy, and the internal integration of hydrogen, oxygen, CO2 and water. Two system schemes were proposed and simulated with the detailed models built with Aspen Plus and Matlab softwares. The energy and exergy analyses show that implementing Scheme 2 that uses CO2 compression and purification unit (CPU) and recovers waste heat from water electrolysis can increase renewable natural gas (RNG) product purity, total energy efficiency, and exergy efficiency by 9.4 %, 20.0 %, and 2.6 % compared to Scheme 1 with combustion deoxygenation, respectively, reaching 97.7 %, 67.4 %, and 51.7 %. Based on the capacity matching methodology, the capacity ratio of proton exchange membrane electrolysis cells to oxy-coal combustion boiler (PEMEC-OCCB) is 3.45 and the capacity ratio of RNG synthesis to oxy-coal combustion boiler (RNG-OCCB) is 0.72. Besides, the RNG production cost is estimated as 1610 $/t exceeding the current market price of natural gas, and it will be lower than the current market price when the PEMEC equipment prices drop to $250/kW in the future. The calculated results of the capacity matching methodology and techno-economic analysis can provide the guideline for the design and equipment selection of the low-carbon multi-energy system with the integration of oxy-coal combustion power plant and Power-to-Gas.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yuting & Zhou, Yuegui, 2025. "Equipment capacity matching methodology and techno-economic analysis for a novel low-carbon multi-energy system with the integration of oxy-coal combustion power plant and power-to-gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:322:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225013350
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.135693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225013350
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doherty, Wayne & Reynolds, Anthony & Kennedy, David, 2010. "Computer simulation of a biomass gasification-solid oxide fuel cell power system using Aspen Plus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4545-4555.
    2. Adnan, Muflih A. & Kibria, Md Golam, 2020. "Comparative techno-economic and life-cycle assessment of power-to-methanol synthesis pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    3. Chen, Heng & Zhang, Meiyan & Xue, Kai & Xu, Gang & Yang, Yongping & Wang, Zepeng & Liu, Wenyi & Liu, Tong, 2020. "An innovative waste-to-energy system integrated with a coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    4. Andrea Barbaresi & Mirko Morini & Agostino Gambarotta, 2022. "Review on the Status of the Research on Power-to-Gas Experimental Activities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-32, August.
    5. Meng, Wenliang & Wang, Dongliang & Zhou, Huairong & Yang, Yong & Li, Hongwei & Liao, Zuwei & Yang, Siyu & Hong, Xiaodong & Li, Guixian, 2023. "Carbon dioxide from oxy-fuel coal-fired power plant integrated green ammonia for urea synthesis: Process modeling, system analysis, and techno-economic evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Perna, Alessandra & Minutillo, Mariagiovanna & Jannelli, Elio & Cigolotti, Viviana & Nam, Suk Woo & Yoon, Kyung Joong, 2018. "Performance assessment of a hybrid SOFC/MGT cogeneration power plant fed by syngas from a biomass down-draft gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 80-91.
    7. Turconi, Roberto & Boldrin, Alessio & Astrup, Thomas, 2013. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 555-565.
    8. Fu, Qian & Kansha, Yasuki & Song, Chunfeng & Liu, Yuping & Ishizuka, Masanori & Tsutsumi, Atsushi, 2016. "A cryogenic air separation process based on self-heat recuperation for oxy-combustion plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1114-1121.
    9. Nami, H. & Arabkoohsar, A., 2019. "Improving the power share of waste-driven CHP plants via parallelization with a small-scale Rankine cycle, a thermodynamic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 27-36.
    10. Bailera, Manuel & Peña, Begoña & Lisbona, Pilar & Marín, Julián & Romeo, Luis M., 2021. "Lab-scale experimental tests of power to gas-oxycombustion hybridization: System design and preliminary results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    11. García-Luna, S. & Ortiz, C. & Carro, A. & Chacartegui, R. & Pérez-Maqueda, L.A., 2022. "Oxygen production routes assessment for oxy-fuel combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yuting & Chen, Heng & Qiao, Shichao & Pan, Peiyuan & Xu, Gang & Dong, Yuehong & Jiang, Xue, 2023. "A novel methanol-electricity cogeneration system based on the integration of water electrolysis and plasma waste gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    2. Zhao, Xinyue & Chen, Heng & Fan, Lanxin & Zheng, Hongxu & Pan, Peiyuan & Bian, Jiayu & Yu, Zhiyong, 2024. "Conceptual waste-to-energy design incorporating plastic pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion: Thermodynamics, economics, and uncertainty analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    3. Hameed, Zeeshan & Aslam, Muhammad & Khan, Zakir & Maqsood, Khuram & Atabani, A.E. & Ghauri, Moinuddin & Khurram, Muhammad Shahzad & Rehan, Mohammad & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar, 2021. "Gasification of municipal solid waste blends with biomass for energy production and resources recovery: Current status, hybrid technologies and innovative prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    4. Meng, Wenliang & Wang, Dongliang & Zhou, Huairong & Yang, Yong & Li, Hongwei & Liao, Zuwei & Yang, Siyu & Hong, Xiaodong & Li, Guixian, 2023. "Carbon dioxide from oxy-fuel coal-fired power plant integrated green ammonia for urea synthesis: Process modeling, system analysis, and techno-economic evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    5. Pan, Zehua & Shen, Jian & Wang, Jingyi & Xu, Xinhai & Chan, Wei Ping & Liu, Siyu & Zhou, Yexin & Yan, Zilin & Jiao, Zhenjun & Lim, Teik-Thye & Zhong, Zheng, 2022. "Thermodynamic analyses of a standalone diesel-fueled distributed power generation system based on solid oxide fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    6. García-Luna, S. & Ortiz, C. & Carro, A. & Chacartegui, R. & Pérez-Maqueda, L.A., 2022. "Oxygen production routes assessment for oxy-fuel combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    7. Zhang, Jifu & Cui, Peizhe & Yang, Sheng & Zhou, Yaru & Du, Wei & Wang, Yinglong & Deng, Chengwei & Wang, Shuai, 2023. "Thermodynamic analysis of SOFC–CCHP system based on municipal sludge plasma gasification with carbon capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    8. Wu, Zhicong & Xu, Gang & Ge, Shiyu & Yang, Zhenjun & Xue, Xiaojun & Chen, Heng, 2024. "An efficient methanol pre-reforming gas turbine combined cycle with integration of mid-temperature energy upgradation and CO2 recovery: Thermodynamic and economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    9. Zhang, Houcheng & Li, Jiarui & Xue, Yejian & Grgur, Branimir N. & Li, Jianming, 2024. "Performance prediction and regulation of a tubular solid oxide fuel cell and hydrophilic modified tubular still hybrid system for electricity and freshwater cogeneration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    10. Zhang, Ruirui & Wang, Guiling & Shen, Xiaoxu & Wang, Jinfeng & Tan, Xianfeng & Feng, Shoutao & Hong, Jinglan, 2020. "Is geothermal heating environmentally superior than coal fired heating in China?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    11. Emblemsvåg, Jan, 2022. "Wind energy is not sustainable when balanced by fossil energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    12. Moroni, Stefano & Antoniucci, Valentina & Bisello, Adriano, 2016. "Energy sprawl, land taking and distributed generation: towards a multi-layered density," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 266-273.
    13. Ayub, Yousaf & Ren, Jingzheng & Shi, Tao & Shen, Weifeng & He, Chang, 2023. "Poultry litter valorization: Development and optimization of an electro-chemical and thermal tri-generation process using an extreme gradient boosting algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    14. Zhao, Xinyue & Chen, Heng & Zheng, Qiwei & Liu, Jun & Pan, Peiyuan & Xu, Gang & Zhao, Qinxin & Jiang, Xue, 2023. "Thermo-economic analysis of a novel hydrogen production system using medical waste and biogas with zero carbon emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    15. Mostafa Shaaban & Jürgen Scheffran & Jürgen Böhner & Mohamed S. Elsobki, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation Technologies in Egypt Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    16. Sadi, M. & Arabkoohsar, A., 2019. "Exergoeconomic analysis of a combined solar-waste driven power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 883-893.
    17. Hanak, Dawid P. & Jenkins, Barrie G. & Kruger, Tim & Manovic, Vasilije, 2017. "High-efficiency negative-carbon emission power generation from integrated solid-oxide fuel cell and calciner," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1189-1201.
    18. Ludin, Norasikin Ahmad & Mustafa, Nur Ifthitah & Hanafiah, Marlia M. & Ibrahim, Mohd Adib & Asri Mat Teridi, Mohd & Sepeai, Suhaila & Zaharim, Azami & Sopian, Kamaruzzaman, 2018. "Prospects of life cycle assessment of renewable energy from solar photovoltaic technologies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 11-28.
    19. Rokni, Masoud, 2014. "Biomass gasification integrated with a solid oxide fuel cell and Stirling engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 6-18.
    20. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:322:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225013350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.