IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v317y2025ics0360544225003263.html

Numerical simulations of fracture propagation in overlying strata for deep underground coal gasification using controlled retraction injection point technology

Author

Listed:
  • Yao, Xinyang
  • Li, Xin
  • Wei, Bo
  • Tian, Jijun
  • Yang, Shuguang
  • Ju, Yiwen

Abstract

Underground coal gasification (UCG) enables the in situ clean conversion of coal seams, making it highly suitable for the development and utilization of deep coal seams. This study focused on the UCG of deep coal of the Xishanyao Formation in the Baikouquan area of Xinjiang, China. A multi-field coupled evolution model based on the finite element method was established for deep UCG to simulate the propagation of induced fractures and multi-physical fields during UCG. The following conclusions were obtained: (1) At burnout distances of 200, 500, and 1000 m, the maximum temperature influence ranges were 20, 23.75, and 25 m, respectively. (2) When the burnout distance reached 200 m, no natural fractures propagated due to the high stress of the deep overlying strata. However, when the burnout distances increased to 500 and 1000 m, the maximum heights of the propagated fractures reached 232.5 and 270 m, with average heights of 157.5 and 172.5 m, respectively. (3) At burnout distances of 200, 500, and 1000 m, the maximum subsidence displacements in the roof rock were 1.68, 5.60, and 17.40 m, respectively. (4) In the actual design process of UCG projects, excessively long gasification channels should be avoided to prevent interaction between aquifers and the UCG cavity, which could lead to the failure of the UCG project. Results of this paper contribute to controlling the scope of the temperature field in practical UCG projects, and predicting the propagation heights of induced fractures as well as the displacement characteristics of the overlying strata. With these as references, a more reasonable UCG scheme considering the scope of induced fractures and stress concentration can be designed, which helps avoid groundwater influx risks and improve the stability of UCG project.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao, Xinyang & Li, Xin & Wei, Bo & Tian, Jijun & Yang, Shuguang & Ju, Yiwen, 2025. "Numerical simulations of fracture propagation in overlying strata for deep underground coal gasification using controlled retraction injection point technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:317:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225003263
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.134684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225003263
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.134684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiong, Yu & Kong, Dezhong & Song, Gaofeng, 2024. "Research hotspots and development trends of green coal mining: Exploring the path to sustainable development of coal mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Yanpeng Chen & Tianduoyi Wang & Jinhua Zhang & Mengyuan Zhang & Junjie Xue & Juntai Shi & Yongshang Kang & Shengjie Li, 2022. "Simulation of Water Influx and Gasified Gas Transport during Underground Coal Gasification with Controlled Retracting Injection Point Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-29, May.
    3. Mocek, Piotr & Pieszczek, Marek & Świądrowski, Jerzy & Kapusta, Krzysztof & Wiatowski, Marian & Stańczyk, Krzysztof, 2016. "Pilot-scale underground coal gasification (UCG) experiment in an operating Mine “Wieczorek” in Poland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 313-321.
    4. Teng, Xiangyu & Zhuang, Weiwei & Liu, Fan-peng & Chang, Tzu-han & Chiu, Yung-ho, 2023. "China's path of carbon neutralization to develop green energy and improve energy efficiency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 397-408.
    5. Eftekhari, Ali Akbar & Van Der Kooi, Hedzer & Bruining, Hans, 2012. "Exergy analysis of underground coal gasification with simultaneous storage of carbon dioxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 729-745.
    6. Feng, Lele & Dong, Maifan & Qin, Botao & Pang, Jiabao & Babaee, Saeideh, 2024. "H2 production enhancement in underground coal gasification with steam addition: Effect of injection conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    7. Zhenming Sun & Wenpeng Bao & Mei Li, 2022. "Comprehensive Water Inrush Risk Assessment Method for Coal Seam Roof," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Wang, Xiaorui & Zhang, Qinghe & Yuan, Liang, 2024. "A coupled thermal-force-chemical-displacement multi-field model for underground coal gasification based on controlled retraction injection point technology and its thermal analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    9. Zhang, Haoyu & Xiao, Yi & Luo, Guangqian & Fang, Can & Zou, Renjie & Zhang, Youjun & Li, Xian & Yao, Hong, 2024. "Numerical simulation study on chemical ignition process of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xiaorui & Zhang, Qinghe & Yuan, Liang, 2024. "A coupled thermal-force-chemical-displacement multi-field model for underground coal gasification based on controlled retraction injection point technology and its thermal analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    2. Guo, Wei & Liu, Huan & Zhu, Xiudong & Zhang, Yingying & Liu, Shuqin & Guo, Tingting, 2025. "Research on the expansion law of combustion cavity in deep coal seam underground gasification based on multi-physics field simulations and response surface method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    3. Xin, Lin & An, Mingyu & Feng, Mingze & Li, Kaixuan & Cheng, Weimin & Liu, Weitao & Hu, Xiangming & Wang, Zhigang & Han, Limin, 2021. "Study on pyrolysis characteristics of lump coal in the context of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    4. Jie Gao & Bo Cui & Qingmei Tan, 2024. "Reducing Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants: An Analysis Using Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    6. Stefan Zelenak & Erika Skvarekova & Andrea Senova & Gabriel Wittenberger, 2021. "The Usage of UCG Technology as Alternative to Reach Low-Carbon Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2015. "Thermo-Mechanical Simulations of Rock Behavior in Underground Coal Gasification Show Negligible Impact of Temperature-Dependent Parameters on Permeability Changes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-28, June.
    8. Tao Yan & Chuanqu Zhu & Qingfeng Li & Qian Xu, 2023. "Investigating Disaster Mechanisms Triggered by Abrupt Overburden Fracture Alterations in Close-Seam Mining Beneath an Exceptionally Thick Sandstone Aquifer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Nakaten, Natalie & Schlüter, Ralph & Azzam, Rafig & Kempka, Thomas, 2014. "Development of a techno-economic model for dynamic calculation of cost of electricity, energy demand and CO2 emissions of an integrated UCG–CCS process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 779-790.
    10. Lou, Siwei & Zhang, Dequan & Li, Danny H.W. & Huang, Yu, 2024. "Evaluating solar ramp rate correlations by simple radiation and wind measurements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    11. Karol Kostúr & Marek Laciak & Milan Durdan, 2018. "Some Influences of Underground Coal Gasification on the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-31, May.
    12. Ding, Xiaoyi & Guo, Pengcheng & Sun, Wei & Harrison, Gareth P. & Lv, Xiaojing & Weng, Yiwu, 2024. "Feasibility evaluation of a wind/P2G/SOFC/GT multi-energy microgrid system with synthetic fuel based on C-H-O elemental ternary analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    13. Kumari, Geeta & Vairakannu, Prabu, 2018. "CO2-air based two stage gasification of low ash and high ash Indian coals in the context of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 822-832.
    14. An, Cheng & Guogang, Jiang, 2025. "New energy vehicle promotion, road transportation efficiency and regional economic growth: based on the PVAR approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    15. Natalie Nakaten & Thomas Kempka, 2019. "Techno-Economic Comparison of Onshore and Offshore Underground Coal Gasification End-Product Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, August.
    16. Xiuchang Shi & Guangluo Lyu, 2023. "Mechanism of Bed Separation Water Inrush during the Mining of Extra-Thick Coal Seam under Super-Thick Sandstone Aquifer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Niannian Li & Chonghao Liu & Jing Liu & Xiangying Jia & Xiaodi Ma & Jianan Zhao, 2025. "Opportunities and Challenges for Green Mining on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau: A Case-Based SWOT Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-23, September.
    18. Ivan Sakhno & Svitlana Sakhno & Oleksandr Vovna, 2025. "Surface Subsidence Response to Safety Pillar Width Between Reactor Cavities in the Underground Gasification of Thin Coal Seams," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    19. Baoxin Zhao & Qimeng Liu & Jingzhong Zhu, 2023. "Risk Assessment and Zonation of Roof Water Inrush Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Principle Component Analysis, and Improved Game Theory (AHP–PCA–IGT) Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Li, Xin & Tian, Jijun & Ju, Yiwen & Chen, Yanpeng, 2022. "Permeability variations of lignite and bituminous coals under elevated pyrolysis temperatures (35–600 °C): An experimental study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:317:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225003263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.