IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v317y2025ics0360544225003263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical simulations of fracture propagation in overlying strata for deep underground coal gasification using controlled retraction injection point technology

Author

Listed:
  • Yao, Xinyang
  • Li, Xin
  • Wei, Bo
  • Tian, Jijun
  • Yang, Shuguang
  • Ju, Yiwen

Abstract

Underground coal gasification (UCG) enables the in situ clean conversion of coal seams, making it highly suitable for the development and utilization of deep coal seams. This study focused on the UCG of deep coal of the Xishanyao Formation in the Baikouquan area of Xinjiang, China. A multi-field coupled evolution model based on the finite element method was established for deep UCG to simulate the propagation of induced fractures and multi-physical fields during UCG. The following conclusions were obtained: (1) At burnout distances of 200, 500, and 1000 m, the maximum temperature influence ranges were 20, 23.75, and 25 m, respectively. (2) When the burnout distance reached 200 m, no natural fractures propagated due to the high stress of the deep overlying strata. However, when the burnout distances increased to 500 and 1000 m, the maximum heights of the propagated fractures reached 232.5 and 270 m, with average heights of 157.5 and 172.5 m, respectively. (3) At burnout distances of 200, 500, and 1000 m, the maximum subsidence displacements in the roof rock were 1.68, 5.60, and 17.40 m, respectively. (4) In the actual design process of UCG projects, excessively long gasification channels should be avoided to prevent interaction between aquifers and the UCG cavity, which could lead to the failure of the UCG project. Results of this paper contribute to controlling the scope of the temperature field in practical UCG projects, and predicting the propagation heights of induced fractures as well as the displacement characteristics of the overlying strata. With these as references, a more reasonable UCG scheme considering the scope of induced fractures and stress concentration can be designed, which helps avoid groundwater influx risks and improve the stability of UCG project.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao, Xinyang & Li, Xin & Wei, Bo & Tian, Jijun & Yang, Shuguang & Ju, Yiwen, 2025. "Numerical simulations of fracture propagation in overlying strata for deep underground coal gasification using controlled retraction injection point technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:317:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225003263
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.134684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225003263
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.134684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiong, Yu & Kong, Dezhong & Song, Gaofeng, 2024. "Research hotspots and development trends of green coal mining: Exploring the path to sustainable development of coal mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Feng, Lele & Dong, Maifan & Qin, Botao & Pang, Jiabao & Babaee, Saeideh, 2024. "H2 production enhancement in underground coal gasification with steam addition: Effect of injection conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    3. Teng, Xiangyu & Zhuang, Weiwei & Liu, Fan-peng & Chang, Tzu-han & Chiu, Yung-ho, 2023. "China's path of carbon neutralization to develop green energy and improve energy efficiency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 397-408.
    4. Eftekhari, Ali Akbar & Van Der Kooi, Hedzer & Bruining, Hans, 2012. "Exergy analysis of underground coal gasification with simultaneous storage of carbon dioxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 729-745.
    5. Yanpeng Chen & Tianduoyi Wang & Jinhua Zhang & Mengyuan Zhang & Junjie Xue & Juntai Shi & Yongshang Kang & Shengjie Li, 2022. "Simulation of Water Influx and Gasified Gas Transport during Underground Coal Gasification with Controlled Retracting Injection Point Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-29, May.
    6. Mocek, Piotr & Pieszczek, Marek & Świądrowski, Jerzy & Kapusta, Krzysztof & Wiatowski, Marian & Stańczyk, Krzysztof, 2016. "Pilot-scale underground coal gasification (UCG) experiment in an operating Mine “Wieczorek” in Poland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 313-321.
    7. Zhenming Sun & Wenpeng Bao & Mei Li, 2022. "Comprehensive Water Inrush Risk Assessment Method for Coal Seam Roof," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Wang, Xiaorui & Zhang, Qinghe & Yuan, Liang, 2024. "A coupled thermal-force-chemical-displacement multi-field model for underground coal gasification based on controlled retraction injection point technology and its thermal analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    9. Zhang, Haoyu & Xiao, Yi & Luo, Guangqian & Fang, Can & Zou, Renjie & Zhang, Youjun & Li, Xian & Yao, Hong, 2024. "Numerical simulation study on chemical ignition process of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xiaorui & Zhang, Qinghe & Yuan, Liang, 2024. "A coupled thermal-force-chemical-displacement multi-field model for underground coal gasification based on controlled retraction injection point technology and its thermal analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    2. Xin, Lin & An, Mingyu & Feng, Mingze & Li, Kaixuan & Cheng, Weimin & Liu, Weitao & Hu, Xiangming & Wang, Zhigang & Han, Limin, 2021. "Study on pyrolysis characteristics of lump coal in the context of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Stefan Zelenak & Erika Skvarekova & Andrea Senova & Gabriel Wittenberger, 2021. "The Usage of UCG Technology as Alternative to Reach Low-Carbon Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2015. "Thermo-Mechanical Simulations of Rock Behavior in Underground Coal Gasification Show Negligible Impact of Temperature-Dependent Parameters on Permeability Changes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Tao Yan & Chuanqu Zhu & Qingfeng Li & Qian Xu, 2023. "Investigating Disaster Mechanisms Triggered by Abrupt Overburden Fracture Alterations in Close-Seam Mining Beneath an Exceptionally Thick Sandstone Aquifer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Lou, Siwei & Zhang, Dequan & Li, Danny H.W. & Huang, Yu, 2024. "Evaluating solar ramp rate correlations by simple radiation and wind measurements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. Kumari, Geeta & Vairakannu, Prabu, 2018. "CO2-air based two stage gasification of low ash and high ash Indian coals in the context of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 822-832.
    8. Baoxin Zhao & Qimeng Liu & Jingzhong Zhu, 2023. "Risk Assessment and Zonation of Roof Water Inrush Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Principle Component Analysis, and Improved Game Theory (AHP–PCA–IGT) Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Jacek Borgulat & Katarzyna Ponikiewska & Łukasz Jałowiecki & Aleksandra Strugała-Wilczek & Grażyna Płaza, 2022. "Are Wetlands as an Integrated Bioremediation System Applicable for the Treatment of Wastewater from Underground Coal Gasification Processes?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Czekała, Wojciech & Bartnikowska, Sylwia & Dach, Jacek & Janczak, Damian & Smurzyńska, Anna & Kozłowski, Kamil & Bugała, Artur & Lewicki, Andrzej & Cieślik, Marta & Typańska, Dorota & Mazurkiewicz, Ja, 2018. "The energy value and economic efficiency of solid biofuels produced from digestate and sawdust," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1118-1122.
    11. Shabani, Mohadeseh & Kordrostami, Sohrab & Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, Monireh, 2023. "Renewable energy performance analysis using fuzzy dynamic directional distance function model under natural and managerial disposability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    12. Farajzadeh, R. & Eftekhari, A.A. & Dafnomilis, G. & Lake, L.W. & Bruining, J., 2020. "On the sustainability of CO2 storage through CO2 – Enhanced oil recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    13. Jin Xu & Junqi Wang, 2025. "Impact of the digital economy in transition to carbon neutrality in Chinese province," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Bing Wang & Jiwei Zhu & Jiancang Xie & Liu Yang, 2025. "How to Promote the Formation of Market-Based Mechanisms for Mine Water Recycling and Utilization in China? A Four-Party Evolutionary Game Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-36, April.
    15. Hassan, Anas M. & Ayoub, M. & Eissa, M. & Musa, T. & Bruining, Hans & Farajzadeh, R., 2019. "Exergy return on exergy investment analysis of natural-polymer (Guar-Arabic gum) enhanced oil recovery process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 162-172.
    16. Duan, Ditao & Liu, Kai, 2023. "Do financial inclusion, natural resources and green innovation affect the Sustainable Environment in Resource Rich Economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    17. Jie Gao & Qingmei Tan & Bo Cui, 2024. "Reducing Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants: An Analysis Using Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    19. Nakaten, Natalie & Schlüter, Ralph & Azzam, Rafig & Kempka, Thomas, 2014. "Development of a techno-economic model for dynamic calculation of cost of electricity, energy demand and CO2 emissions of an integrated UCG–CCS process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 779-790.
    20. Karol Kostúr & Marek Laciak & Milan Durdan, 2018. "Some Influences of Underground Coal Gasification on the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-31, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:317:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225003263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.