IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v261y2020ics0306261919321555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the sustainability of CO2 storage through CO2 – Enhanced oil recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Farajzadeh, R.
  • Eftekhari, A.A.
  • Dafnomilis, G.
  • Lake, L.W.
  • Bruining, J.

Abstract

This work uses pilot examples of CO2 enhanced oil recovery to analyze whether and under which circumstances it is exergetically favorable to sequester CO2 through enhanced oil recovery. We find that the net storage efficiency (ratio between the stored and captured CO2) of the carbon capture and storage (CCS)-only projects is maximally 6–56% depending on the fuel used in the power plants. With the current state of technology, the CCS process will re-emit a minimum of 0.43–0.94 kg of CO2 per kg of CO2 stored. From thermodynamics point of view, CO2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR) with CCS option is not sustainable, i.e., during the life cycle of the process more energy is consumed than the energy produced from oil. For the CCS to be efficient in reducing CO2 levels (1) the exergetic cost of CO2 separation from flue gas should be reduced, and/or (2) the capture process should not lead to additional carbon emission. Furthermore, we find that the exergy recovery factor of CO2-EOR depends on the CO2 utilization factor, which is currently in the low range of 2–4 bbl/tCO2 based on the field data. Exergetically, CO2 EOR with storage option produces 30–40% less exergy compared to conventional CO2 enhanced oil recovery projects with CO2 supplied from natural sources; however, this leads to storage of >400 kg of extra CO2 per barrel of oil produced.

Suggested Citation

  • Farajzadeh, R. & Eftekhari, A.A. & Dafnomilis, G. & Lake, L.W. & Bruining, J., 2020. "On the sustainability of CO2 storage through CO2 – Enhanced oil recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:261:y:2020:i:c:s0306261919321555
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919321555
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carranza Sánchez, Yamid Alberto & de Oliveira, Silvio, 2015. "Exergy analysis of offshore primary petroleum processing plant with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 46-56.
    2. Geuzebroek, F.H. & Schneiders, L.H.J.M. & Kraaijveld, G.J.C. & Feron, P.H.M., 2004. "Exergy analysis of alkanolamine-based CO2 removal unit with AspenPlus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1241-1248.
    3. Szargut, Jan, 1989. "Chemical exergies of the elements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 269-286.
    4. Morris, David R. & Szargut, Jan, 1986. "Standard chemical exergy of some elements and compounds on the planet earth," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 11(8), pages 733-755.
    5. Eftekhari, Ali Akbar & Van Der Kooi, Hedzer & Bruining, Hans, 2012. "Exergy analysis of underground coal gasification with simultaneous storage of carbon dioxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 729-745.
    6. Wang, Xiao & van ’t Veld, Klaas & Marcy, Peter & Huzurbazar, Snehalata & Alvarado, Vladimir, 2018. "Economic co-optimization of oil recovery and CO2 sequestration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 132-147.
    7. Jiang, Jieyun & Rui, Zhenhua & Hazlett, Randy & Lu, Jun, 2019. "An integrated technical-economic model for evaluating CO2 enhanced oil recovery development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 190-211.
    8. Ferrara, G. & Lanzini, A. & Leone, P. & Ho, M.T. & Wiley, D.E., 2017. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of post-combustion CO2 capture using MEA-solvent chemical absorption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 113-128.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Kai & Lau, Hon Chung & Liu, Shuyang & Li, Hangyu, 2022. "Carbon capture and storage in the coastal region of China between Shanghai and Hainan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    2. Al-Qahtani, Amjad & Parkinson, Brett & Hellgardt, Klaus & Shah, Nilay & Guillen-Gosalbez, Gonzalo, 2021. "Uncovering the true cost of hydrogen production routes using life cycle monetisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    3. Jiangyuan Yao & Wanju Yuan & Xiaolong Peng & Zhuoheng Chen & Yongan Gu, 2023. "A Novel Multi-Phase Strategy for Optimizing CO 2 Utilization and Storage in an Oil Reservoir," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Latifah M. Alsarhan & Alhanouf S. Alayyar & Naif B. Alqahtani & Nezar H. Khdary, 2021. "Circular Carbon Economy (CCE): A Way to Invest CO 2 and Protect the Environment, a Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Norouzi, Amir Mohammad & Pouranian, Fatemeh & Rabbani, Arash & Fowler, Neil & Gluyas, Jon & Niasar, Vahid & Ezekiel, Justin & Babaei, Masoud, 2023. "CO2-plume geothermal: Power net generation from 3D fluvial aquifers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    6. Bokka, Harsha Kumar & Lau, Hon Chung, 2023. "Decarbonising Vietnam's power and industry sectors by carbon capture and storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, B. & Chen, G.Q., 2007. "Modified ecological footprint accounting and analysis based on embodied exergy--a case study of the Chinese society 1981-2001," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 355-376, March.
    2. Muhammad Asif & Muhammad Suleman & Ihtishamul Haq & Syed Asad Jamal, 2018. "Post‐combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption and hybrid system: current status and challenges," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(6), pages 998-1031, December.
    3. Hao, Xiaoqing & An, Haizhong & Qi, Hai & Gao, Xiangyun, 2016. "Evolution of the exergy flow network embodied in the global fossil energy trade: Based on complex network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1515-1522.
    4. Chen, G.Q. & Qi, Z.H., 2007. "Systems account of societal exergy utilization: China 2003," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 102-118.
    5. Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Fülöp, Tamás Gábor & Breuhaus, Peter & Elmegaard, Brian, 2014. "Life performance of oil and gas platforms: Site integration and thermodynamic evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 282-301.
    6. Zhang, Bo & Chen, G.Q., 2010. "Physical sustainability assessment for the China society: Exergy-based systems account for resources use and environmental emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 1527-1545, August.
    7. Chen, G.Q. & Chen, B., 2009. "Extended-exergy analysis of the Chinese society," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1127-1144.
    8. Abdoli, B. & Hooshmand, F. & MirHassani, S.A., 2023. "A novel stochastic programming model under endogenous uncertainty for the CCS-EOR planning problem," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    9. Bisio, G & Rubatto, G & Martini, R, 2000. "Heat transfer, energy saving and pollution control in UHP electric-arc furnaces," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 25(11), pages 1047-1066.
    10. Whiting, Kai & Carmona, Luis Gabriel & Sousa, Tânia, 2017. "A review of the use of exergy to evaluate the sustainability of fossil fuels and non-fuel mineral depletion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 202-211.
    11. Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Knudsen, Thomas & Larsen, Ulrik & Haglind, Fredrik, 2014. "Thermodynamic evaluation of the Kalina split-cycle concepts for waste heat recovery applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 277-288.
    12. Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Pierobon, Leonardo & Elmegaard, Brian & Haglind, Fredrik & Breuhaus, Peter & Voldsund, Mari, 2013. "Exergetic assessment of energy systems on North Sea oil and gas platforms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 23-36.
    13. Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Jacyno, Tomasz & Breuhaus, Peter & Voldsund, Mari & Elmegaard, Brian, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of an upstream petroleum plant operated on a mature field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 454-469.
    14. Tan, Ling Min & Arbabi, Hadi & Brockway, Paul E. & Densley Tingley, Danielle & Mayfield, Martin, 2019. "An ecological-thermodynamic approach to urban metabolism: Measuring resource utilization with open system network effectiveness analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    15. Zheng, Danxing & Wu, Zhaohui & Huang, Weijia & Chen, Youhui, 2017. "Energy quality factor of materials conversion and energy quality reference system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 768-778.
    16. Song, Dan & Lin, Ling & Wu, Ye, 2019. "Extended exergy accounting for a typical cement industry in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 678-686.
    17. Wang, Ding & Sun, Lei & Xie, Yonghui, 2023. "Performance evaluation of CO2 pressurization and storage system combined with S–CO2 power generation process and absorption refrigeration cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    18. Roussanaly, S. & Aasen, A. & Anantharaman, R. & Danielsen, B. & Jakobsen, J. & Heme-De-Lacotte, L. & Neji, G. & Sødal, A. & Wahl, P.E. & Vrana, T.K. & Dreux, R., 2019. "Offshore power generation with carbon capture and storage to decarbonise mainland electricity and offshore oil and gas installations: A techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 478-494.
    19. Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Voldsund, Mari & Elmegaard, Brian & Ertesvåg, Ivar Ståle & Kjelstrup, Signe, 2014. "On the definition of exergy efficiencies for petroleum systems: Application to offshore oil and gas processing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 264-281.
    20. Chen, B. & Chen, G.Q., 2006. "Exergy analysis for resource conversion of the Chinese Society 1993 under the material product system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1115-1150.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:261:y:2020:i:c:s0306261919321555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.