IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v313y2024ics0360544224037794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced dynamic modeling of regenerative CO2 transcritical power cycles: Comparative analysis of Pham-corrected and conventional turbine models

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Tao
  • Wu, Chuang
  • Li, Zhankui
  • Li, Bo

Abstract

Turbine modeling plays a critical role in assessing system power output and performance in CO₂ transcritical power cycle (CTPC) systems, particularly under dynamic operating conditions. Conventional turbine models often fail to provide accurate predictions when inlet parameters deviate from the design point, leading to discrepancies in system behavior. This paper introduces a novel methodology by integrating a Pham-based corrected turbine performance map into a regenerative CTPC dynamic system. This approach enhances turbine modeling accuracy compared to traditional models, such as the uncorrected turbine performance map, nozzle model, and empirical model. The proposed Pham-corrected model method improves system response stability, particularly in terms of inlet pressure and CO₂ mass flow rate under heat source temperature reductions, offering more reliable performance predictions. In contrast, the empirical model shows substantial deviations in net power output (32 kW or 4.0 %) and thermal efficiency (1.36 %), leading to longer system stabilization times. The Pham-corrected and uncorrected turbine performance map models exhibit similar responses under cooling water mass flow rate reductions but diverge in turbine inlet pressure trends compared to the nozzle and empirical models. Additionally, the uncorrected turbine performance map model shows significant deviations in net power (25.6 kW or 3.17 %) and thermal efficiency (0.5 %) under a 10 % reduction in pump speed. This study highlights the importance of correcting turbine inlet parameters and addressing prediction deviations in conventional models. The Pham-corrected turbine model improves reliability, performance prediction, and design optimization, especially under fluctuating heat sources. With its potential to enhance system stability and efficiency, this methodology offers significant prospects for future CTPC applications, including waste heat recovery and renewable energy integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Tao & Wu, Chuang & Li, Zhankui & Li, Bo, 2024. "Enhanced dynamic modeling of regenerative CO2 transcritical power cycles: Comparative analysis of Pham-corrected and conventional turbine models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:313:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224037794
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.134001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224037794
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.134001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Forman, Clemens & Muritala, Ibrahim Kolawole & Pardemann, Robert & Meyer, Bernd, 2016. "Estimating the global waste heat potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1568-1579.
    2. Jeong, Yongju & Son, Seongmin & Cho, Seong Kuk & Baik, Seungjoon & Lee, Jeong Ik, 2020. "Evaluation of supercritical CO2 compressor off-design performance prediction methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Shu, Gequn & Shi, Lingfeng & Tian, Hua & Li, Xiaoya & Huang, Guangdai & Chang, Liwen, 2016. "An improved CO2-based transcritical Rankine cycle (CTRC) used for engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 171-182.
    4. Manente, Giovanni & Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Paci, Marco, 2013. "An Organic Rankine Cycle off-design model for the search of the optimal control strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 97-106.
    5. Wang, Di & Zhou, Yu & Si, Long & Sun, Lingfang & Zhou, Yunlong, 2024. "Performance study of 660 MW coal-fired power plant coupled transcritical carbon dioxide energy storage cycle: Sensitivity and dynamic characteristic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    6. Horst, Tilmann Abbe & Rottengruber, Hermann-Sebastian & Seifert, Marco & Ringler, Jürgen, 2013. "Dynamic heat exchanger model for performance prediction and control system design of automotive waste heat recovery systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 293-303.
    7. Chen, Xiaoxue & Liu, Chao & Li, Qibin & Wang, Xurong & Wang, Shukun, 2020. "Dynamic behavior of supercritical organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixture working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Wang, Xuan & Cai, Jinwen & Lin, Zhimin & Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn & Wang, Rui & Bian, Xingyan & Shi, Lingfeng, 2022. "Dynamic simulation study of the start-up and shutdown processes for a recompression CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    9. Chen, Kang & Han, Zihao & Fan, Gang & Zhang, Yicen & Yu, Haibin & Dai, Yiping, 2023. "Optimum design point exploration and performance analysis of a novel CO2 power generation system for LNG cold energy recovery: Considering the temperature fluctuation of heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    10. Xu, Z.Y. & Wang, R.Z. & Yang, Chun, 2019. "Perspectives for low-temperature waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 1037-1043.
    11. Shu, Gequn & Wang, Rui & Tian, Hua & Wang, Xuan & Li, Xiaoya & Cai, Jinwen & Xu, Zhiqiang, 2020. "Dynamic performance of the transcritical power cycle using CO2-based binary zeotropic mixtures for truck engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    12. Wang, Rui & Wang, Xuan & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua & Cai, Jinwen & Bian, Xingyan & Li, Xinyu & Qin, Zheng & Shi, Lingfeng, 2022. "Comparison of different load-following control strategies of a sCO2 Brayton cycle under full load range," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    13. Deng, Tianrui & Li, Xionghui & Wang, Qiuwang & Ma, Ting, 2019. "Dynamic modelling and transient characteristics of supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 292-302.
    14. Zheng, Haonan & Miao, Zheng & Xu, Jinliang, 2024. "Partial load operation characteristics of supercritical CO2 coal-fired power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    15. He, Jintao & Zhang, Yonghao & Tian, Hua & Wang, Xuan & Li, Ligeng & Cai, Jinwen & Shi, Lingfeng & Shu, Gequn, 2022. "Dynamic performance of a multi-mode operation CO2-based system combining cooling and power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    16. Singh, Rajinesh & Kearney, Michael P. & Manzie, Chris, 2013. "Extremum-seeking control of a supercritical carbon-dioxide closed Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 380-387.
    17. Li, Xiaoya & Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn & Zhao, Mingru & Markides, Christos N. & Hu, Chen, 2019. "Potential of carbon dioxide transcritical power cycle waste-heat recovery systems for heavy-duty truck engines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1581-1599.
    18. Luu, Minh Tri & Milani, Dia & McNaughton, Robbie & Abbas, Ali, 2017. "Dynamic modelling and start-up operation of a solar-assisted recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 247-263.
    19. Iverson, Brian D. & Conboy, Thomas M. & Pasch, James J. & Kruizenga, Alan M., 2013. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 957-970.
    20. Alsawy, Tariq & Elsayed, Mohamed L. & Mohammed, Ramy H. & Mesalhy, Osama, 2024. "Accuracy assessment of the turbomachinery performance maps correction models used in dynamic characteristics of supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    21. Bian, Xingyan & Wang, Xuan & Wang, Rui & Cai, Jinwen & Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn & Lin, Zhimin & Yu, Xiangyu & Shi, Lingfeng, 2022. "A comprehensive evaluation of the effect of different control valves on the dynamic performance of a recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    22. Singh, Rajinesh & Miller, Sarah A. & Rowlands, Andrew S. & Jacobs, Peter A., 2013. "Dynamic characteristics of a direct-heated supercritical carbon-dioxide Brayton cycle in a solar thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 194-204.
    23. Li, Xiaoya & Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn & Hu, Chen & Sun, Rui & Li, Ligeng, 2018. "Effects of external perturbations on dynamic performance of carbon dioxide transcritical power cycles for truck engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 920-931.
    24. Wan, Yuke & Wu, Chuang & Liu, Yu & Liu, Chao & Li, Hang & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2023. "A technical feasibility study of a liquid carbon dioxide energy storage system: Integrated component design and off-design performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    25. Du, Yadong & Yang, Ce & Zhao, Ben & Gao, Jianbing & Hu, Chenxing & Zhang, Hanzhi & Zhao, Wei, 2022. "Dynamic characteristics of a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle against variable operating conditions and temperature fluctuations of reactor outlet coolant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alsawy, Tariq & Elsayed, Mohamed L. & Mohammed, Ramy H. & Mesalhy, Osama, 2024. "Accuracy assessment of the turbomachinery performance maps correction models used in dynamic characteristics of supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    2. Lu, Bowen & Zhang, Zhifu & Cai, Jinwen & Wang, Wei & Ju, Xueming & Xu, Yao & Lu, Xun & Tian, Hua & Shi, Lingfeng & Shu, Gequn, 2023. "Integrating engine thermal management into waste heat recovery under steady-state design and dynamic off-design conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    3. Yu, Aofang & Xing, Lingli & Su, Wen & Liu, Pei, 2023. "State-of-the-art review on the CO2 combined power and cooling system: System configuration, modeling and performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Zhao, Quanbin & Xu, Jiayuan & Hou, Min & Chong, Daotong & Wang, Jinshi & Chen, Weixiong, 2024. "Dynamic characteristic analysis of SCO2 Brayton cycle under different turbine back pressure modes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    5. Li, Xiaoya & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua & Shi, Lingfeng & Huang, Guangdai & Chen, Tianyu & Liu, Peng, 2017. "Preliminary tests on dynamic characteristics of a CO2 transcritical power cycle using an expansion valve in engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 696-707.
    6. Zhang, Yifan & Li, Hongzhi & Li, Kailun & Yang, Yu & Zhou, Yujia & Zhang, Xuwei & Xu, Ruina & Zhuge, Weilin & Lei, Xianliang & Dan, Guangju, 2022. "Dynamic characteristics and control strategies of the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle tailored for the new generation concentrating solar power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    7. Meng, Qingqiang & Cao, Lihua & Fang, Minghui & Si, Heyong, 2025. "Dynamic response characteristics of sCO2 mixtures under variable conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    8. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Atif, Maimoon, 2015. "Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 61-71.
    9. Zhao, Tian & Li, Hang & Li, Xia & Sun, Qing-Han & Fang, Xuan-Yi & Ma, Huan & Chen, Qun, 2024. "A frequency domain dynamic simulation method for heat exchangers and thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    10. Li, Zhi & Yu, Xiaoli & Wang, Lei & Lu, Yiji & Huang, Rui & Chang, Jinwei & Jiang, Ruicheng, 2020. "Effects of fluctuating thermal sources on a shell-and-tube latent thermal energy storage during charging process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Ehsan, M. Monjurul & Guan, Zhiqiang & Gurgenci, Hal & Klimenko, Alexander, 2020. "Feasibility of dry cooling in supercritical CO2 power cycle in concentrated solar power application: Review and a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    12. Luu, Minh Tri & Milani, Dia & McNaughton, Robbie & Abbas, Ali, 2017. "Analysis for flexible operation of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with solar thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 752-771.
    13. Imran, Muhammad & Pili, Roberto & Usman, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik, 2020. "Dynamic modeling and control strategies of organic Rankine cycle systems: Methods and challenges," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    14. Zhang, Yifan & Zhou, Yujia & Yang, Yu & Li, Kailun & Lei, Xianliang & Li, Hongzhi, 2024. "Study on control strategies of the MW-scale supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle for lead-cooled fast reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    15. Rui Wang & Xuan Wang & Hua Tian & Gequn Shu & Jing Zhang & Yan Gao & Xingyan Bian, 2019. "Dynamic Performance Comparison of CO 2 Mixture Transcritical Power Cycle Systems with Variable Configurations for Engine Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    16. Battisti, Felipe G. & Cardemil, José M. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2016. "A multivariable optimization of a Brayton power cycle operating with CO2 as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 908-916.
    17. Marchionni, Matteo & Bianchi, Giuseppe & Tassou, Savvas A., 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of Joule-Brayton cycle architectures for heat to power conversion from high-grade heat sources using CO2 in the supercritical state," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1140-1152.
    18. Li, Xiaoya & Xu, Bin & Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Towards a novel holistic design of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems operating under heat source fluctuations and intermittency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    19. Fang, Wenchao & Chen, Sheng & Shi, Shuo, 2022. "Dynamic characteristics and real-time control of a particle-to-sCO2 moving bed heat exchanger assisted by BP neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    20. Luu, Minh Tri & Milani, Dia & McNaughton, Robbie & Abbas, Ali, 2017. "Dynamic modelling and start-up operation of a solar-assisted recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 247-263.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:313:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224037794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.