IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v257y2022ics0360544222015985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison between biogas and pure methane as the fuel of a polygeneration system including a regenerative gas turbine cycle and partial cooling supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: 4E analysis and tri-objective optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Minglong
  • Chen, Hong
  • Zoghi, Mohammad
  • Habibi, Hamed

Abstract

The present study aims at utilizing the waste energy from a regenerative gas turbine cycle (GTC) for the production of hydrogen in a proton exchange membrane electrolysis unit (PEMEU), freshwater in a reverse osmosis desalination unit (RODU), and hot steam in a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). The waste heat of the GTC is first recuperated in a partial cooling supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle (SCBC) to supply the required electricity for the PEMEU and RODU. Then, the residual heat is recuperated in the HRSG to produce hot steam. The waste heat of the SCBC is recovered by two thermoelectric generators in the heat dissipation stages of the cycle. The system is assessed and optimized from thermodynamic, economic, and environmental aspects for the two cases of utilizing methane and biogas as fuel. The optimization results indicate that biogas is superior from an economic aspect as the unit cost of polygeneration and economic cost rate in the case of biogas are 32.5% lower than the case of methane as fuel. On the other hand, employing methane as the fuel brings about lower environmental impacts as it causes a 29% lower environmental cost rate than the case of biogas as fuel. There is quite a narrow difference between the exergy efficiency of the two cases from 40.45% in the case of biogas to 40.72% in the case of methane as fuel. Moreover, the heat loss recovery of the GTC ameliorates the exergy efficiency by 11.96% points in the biogas case.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Minglong & Chen, Hong & Zoghi, Mohammad & Habibi, Hamed, 2022. "Comparison between biogas and pure methane as the fuel of a polygeneration system including a regenerative gas turbine cycle and partial cooling supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: 4E analysis and tri-ob," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:257:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222015985
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222015985
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124695?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Hang & Hou, Kai & Xu, Xiandong & Jia, Hongjie & Zhu, Lewei & Mu, Yunfei, 2022. "Probabilistic energy flow calculation for regional integrated energy system considering cross-system failures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    2. Cao, Yan & Dhahad, Hayder A. & Hussen, Hasanen M. & Parikhani, Towhid, 2022. "Proposal and evaluation of two innovative combined gas turbine and ejector refrigeration cycles fueled by biogas: Thermodynamic and optimization analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 749-764.
    3. Cao, Yan & Habibi, Hamed & Zoghi, Mohammad & Raise, Amir, 2021. "Waste heat recovery of a combined regenerative gas turbine - recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle driven by a hybrid solar-biomass heat source for multi-generation purpose: 4E analysis and pa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    4. Nafey, A.S. & Sharaf, M.A., 2010. "Combined solar organic Rankine cycle with reverse osmosis desalination process: Energy, exergy, and cost evaluations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 2571-2580.
    5. Al-Rashed, Abdullah A.A.A. & Afrand, Masoud, 2021. "Multi-criteria exergoeconomic optimization for a combined gas turbine-supercritical CO2 plant with compressor intake cooling fueled by biogas from anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    6. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    7. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    8. Zare, A. Darabadi & Saray, R. Khoshbakhti & Mirmasoumi, S. & Bahlouli, K., 2019. "Optimization strategies for mixing ratio of biogas and natural gas co-firing in a cogeneration of heat and power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 635-644.
    9. Xia, Guanghui & Sun, Qingxuan & Cao, Xu & Wang, Jiangfeng & Yu, Yizhao & Wang, Laisheng, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a solar-powered transcritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) power cycle for reverse osmosis desalination based on the recovery of cryogenic energy of LNG (liquefied n," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 643-653.
    10. Ghaebi, Hadi & Yari, Mortaza & Gargari, Saeed Ghavami & Rostamzadeh, Hadi, 2019. "Thermodynamic modeling and optimization of a combined biogas steam reforming system and organic Rankine cycle for coproduction of power and hydrogen," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 87-102.
    11. Akbari, Ata D. & Mahmoudi, Seyed M.S., 2014. "Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 501-512.
    12. Nikpey, H. & Assadi, M. & Breuhaus, P. & Mørkved, P.T., 2014. "Experimental evaluation and ANN modeling of a recuperative micro gas turbine burning mixtures of natural gas and biogas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 30-41.
    13. Sevinchan, Eren & Dincer, Ibrahim & Lang, Haoxiang, 2019. "Energy and exergy analyses of a biogas driven multigenerational system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 715-723.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Jincheng & Hai, Tao & Ali, Masood Ashraf & Shamseldin, Mohamed A. & Almojil, Sattam Fahad & Almohana, Abdulaziz Ibrahim & Alali, Abdulrhman Fahmi, 2023. "Waste heat recovery of a wind turbine for poly-generation purpose: Feasibility analysis, environmental impact assessment, and parametric optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    2. Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Ramin Ghiami Sardroud & Mohsen Sadeghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2022. "Integration of Supercritical CO 2 Recompression Brayton Cycle with Organic Rankine/Flash and Kalina Cycles: Thermoeconomic Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Yan, Jun-Jie & Wang, Kun, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance analysis of different supercritical Brayton cycles using CO2-based binary mixtures in the molten salt solar power tower systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 785-798.
    4. Duniam, Sam & Veeraragavan, Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Battisti, Felipe G. & Cardemil, José M. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2016. "A multivariable optimization of a Brayton power cycle operating with CO2 as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 908-916.
    6. Cao, Yan & Habibi, Hamed & Zoghi, Mohammad & Raise, Amir, 2021. "Waste heat recovery of a combined regenerative gas turbine - recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle driven by a hybrid solar-biomass heat source for multi-generation purpose: 4E analysis and pa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    7. Asgari, Nima & Khoshbakhti Saray, Rahim & Mirmasoumi, Siamak, 2023. "Seasonal exergoeconomic assessment and optimization of a dual-fuel trigeneration system of power, cooling, heating, and domestic hot water, proposed for Tabriz, Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 192-213.
    8. S. Mohammad S. Mahmoudi & Ata D. Akbari & Marc A. Rosen, 2016. "Thermoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of a New Combined Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Recompression Brayton/Kalina Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Blanco-Marigorta, A.M. & Lozano-Medina, A. & Marcos, J.D., 2017. "A critical review of definitions for exergetic efficiency in reverse osmosis desalination plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 752-760.
    10. Jiang, Yuemao & Ma, Yue & Han, Fenghui & Ji, Yulong & Cai, Wenjian & Wang, Zhe, 2023. "Assessment and optimization of a novel waste heat stepped utilization system integrating partial heating sCO2 cycle and ejector refrigeration cycle using zeotropic mixtures for gas turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    11. Hai, Tao & Zoghi, Mohammad & Abed, Hooman & Chauhan, Bhupendra Singh & Ahmed, Ahmed Najat, 2023. "Exergy-economic study and multi-objective optimization of a geothermal-based combined organic flash cycle and PEMFC for poly-generation purpose," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    12. Cao, Yan & Dhahad, Hayder A. & Hussen, Hasanen M. & Anqi, Ali E. & Farouk, Naeim & Issakhov, Alibek, 2022. "Development and tri-objective optimization of a novel biomass to power and hydrogen plant: A comparison of fueling with biomass gasification or biomass digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    13. Alharbi, Sattam & Elsayed, Mohamed L. & Chow, Louis C., 2020. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of an integrated system of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle and multi-effect desalination," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Kasaeian, Alibakhsh & Rajaee, Fatemeh & Yan, Wei-Mon, 2019. "Osmotic desalination by solar energy: A critical review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1473-1490.
    15. Fan, Guangli & Ahmadi, A. & Ehyaei, M.A. & Das, Biplab, 2021. "Energy, exergy, economic and exergoenvironmental analyses of polygeneration system integrated gas cycle, absorption chiller, and Copper-Chlorine thermochemical cycle to produce power, cooling, and hyd," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    16. Wang, Shun-sen & Wu, Chuang & Li, Jun, 2018. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of single-pressure single-stage and multi-stage CO2 transcritical power cycles for engine waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 559-577.
    17. Qureshi, Bilal Ahmed & Zubair, Syed M., 2015. "Exergetic analysis of a brackish water reverse osmosis desalination unit with various energy recovery systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 256-265.
    18. Cao, Yan & Dhahad, Hayder A. & Togun, Hussein & Hussen, Hasanen M. & Anqi, Ali E. & Farouk, Naeim & Issakhov, Alibek, 2021. "Feasibility investigation of a novel geothermal-based integrated energy conversion system: Modified specific exergy costing (M-SPECO) method and optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1124-1147.
    19. Al-Rashed, Abdullah A.A.A. & Afrand, Masoud, 2021. "Multi-criteria exergoeconomic optimization for a combined gas turbine-supercritical CO2 plant with compressor intake cooling fueled by biogas from anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    20. Ma, Yuegeng & Morozyuk, Tatiana & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2019. "Optimal integration of recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with main compression intercooling in solar power tower system based on exergoeconomic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1134-1154.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:257:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222015985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.