IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v310y2024ics0360544224029475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimized multi-criteria performance of a poly-generation layout including a Stirling engine and a supercritical Brayton cycle using biogas and methane as two potential fuels of a topping gas turbine cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Dan
  • Jasim, Dheyaa J.
  • Zoghi, Mohammad
  • Habibi, Hamed

Abstract

The combination of a supercritical Brayton cycle, an absorption chiller, a Stirling engine, a reverse osmosis desalination system, and a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer is investigated for waste heat recovery of a topping gas turbine cycle. The required electricity for hydrogen and freshwater production is supplied by the Stirling engine and supercritical Brayton cycle, respectively. In addition, the output power is provided by the gas turbine cycle, and the exiting cold stream of the Stirling engine is considered hot water for domestic utilization. A comparison is made between biogas and pure methane as two possible fuels for the system. Energy and exergy analyses, economic analysis using the specific exergy costing approach, and environmental analysis considering the carbon dioxide emissions are employed in the study. The three-objective optimization of the configuration discloses an exergy efficiency (ηex) of 39.49 % and 39.85 % in the cases of biogas and methane, respectively. The proposed system can improve ηex by 6.18 % points compared to the stand-alone GTC. The specific cost of poly-generation (cpoly) and the total cost rate (C˙tot) are obtained as 25.92 $GJ−1 and 249.5 $h−1 in the biogas mode, while these values are calculated as 36.75 $GJ−1 and 336.7 $h−1 in the methane case. The environmental cost rate (C˙env) of the system is 24.78 $h−1 in the case of biogas and 17.47 $h−1 in the methane mode. The results confirm the superiority of the methane case from the environmental viewpoint over biogas. However, the low values of cpoly and C˙tot in the biogas case indicate that biogas is superior to methane from a general standpoint. The utilization of the present setup for waste heat recovery of biogas-driven GTCs is recommended due to the higher ηex than the previous layouts.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Dan & Jasim, Dheyaa J. & Zoghi, Mohammad & Habibi, Hamed, 2024. "Optimized multi-criteria performance of a poly-generation layout including a Stirling engine and a supercritical Brayton cycle using biogas and methane as two potential fuels of a topping gas turbine ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:310:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224029475
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224029475
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133172?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    2. Habibi, Hamed & Chitsaz, Ata & Javaherdeh, Koroush & Zoghi, Mohammad & Ayazpour, Mojtaba, 2018. "Thermo-economic analysis and optimization of a solar-driven ammonia-water regenerative Rankine cycle and LNG cold energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 147-160.
    3. Mohammadkhani, F. & Shokati, N. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Rosen, M.A., 2014. "Exergoeconomic assessment and parametric study of a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor combined with two Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 533-543.
    4. Li, Jiaojiao & Zoghi, Mohammad & Zhao, Linfeng, 2022. "Thermo-economic assessment and optimization of a geothermal-driven tri-generation system for power, cooling, and hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    5. Cao, Yan & Dhahad, Hayder A. & Hussen, Hasanen M. & Parikhani, Towhid, 2022. "Proposal and evaluation of two innovative combined gas turbine and ejector refrigeration cycles fueled by biogas: Thermodynamic and optimization analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 749-764.
    6. Cao, Yan & Dhahad, Hayder A. & Hussen, Hasanen M. & Anqi, Ali E. & Farouk, Naeim & Issakhov, Alibek, 2022. "Development and tri-objective optimization of a novel biomass to power and hydrogen plant: A comparison of fueling with biomass gasification or biomass digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    7. Rokni, Masoud, 2014. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis of a system with biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and Stirling engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 19-31.
    8. Sevinchan, Eren & Dincer, Ibrahim & Lang, Haoxiang, 2019. "Energy and exergy analyses of a biogas driven multigenerational system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 715-723.
    9. Ansarinasab, Hojat & Hajabdollahi, Hassan & Fatimah, Manal, 2021. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a novel geothermal-based multigeneration system using LNG cold energy- integration of Kalina cycle, stirling engine, desalination unit and magnetic refrigeration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Al-Rashed, Abdullah A.A.A. & Afrand, Masoud, 2021. "Multi-criteria exergoeconomic optimization for a combined gas turbine-supercritical CO2 plant with compressor intake cooling fueled by biogas from anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Minglong & Chen, Hong & Zoghi, Mohammad & Habibi, Hamed, 2022. "Comparison between biogas and pure methane as the fuel of a polygeneration system including a regenerative gas turbine cycle and partial cooling supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: 4E analysis and tri-ob," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    2. Liu, Shulong & Huang, Xuechen & Zhang, Jinfeng & Gao, Chao & Wan, Qian & Feng, Dulong, 2024. "Multi-criteria optimization next to a comparative analysis of a polygeneration layout based on a double-stage gas turbine cycle fueled by biomass and hydrogen," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).
    3. Liao, Jixiang & Liu, Xingye & Pang, Yunfeng, 2024. "Economic and technical optimization of a tri-generation setup integrating a partial evaporation Rankine cycle with an ejector-based refrigeration system using different solar collectors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    4. Hai, Tao & Zoghi, Mohammad & Abed, Hooman & Chauhan, Bhupendra Singh & Ahmed, Ahmed Najat, 2023. "Exergy-economic study and multi-objective optimization of a geothermal-based combined organic flash cycle and PEMFC for poly-generation purpose," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    5. Zhou, Jincheng & Hai, Tao & Ali, Masood Ashraf & Shamseldin, Mohamed A. & Almojil, Sattam Fahad & Almohana, Abdulaziz Ibrahim & Alali, Abdulrhman Fahmi, 2023. "Waste heat recovery of a wind turbine for poly-generation purpose: Feasibility analysis, environmental impact assessment, and parametric optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    6. Cao, Yan & Habibi, Hamed & Zoghi, Mohammad & Raise, Amir, 2021. "Waste heat recovery of a combined regenerative gas turbine - recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle driven by a hybrid solar-biomass heat source for multi-generation purpose: 4E analysis and pa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    7. Zhu, Chaoyang & Wang, Mengxia & Guo, Mengxing & Deng, Jinxin & Du, Qipei & Wei, Wei & Zhang, Yunxiang & Mohebbi, Amir, 2024. "An innovative process design and multi-criteria study/optimization of a biomass digestion-supercritical carbon dioxide scenario toward boosting a geothermal-driven cogeneration system for power and he," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    8. Wang, Jiangjiang & Mao, Tianzhi & Wu, Jing, 2017. "Modified exergoeconomic modeling and analysis of combined cooling heating and power system integrated with biomass-steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 871-882.
    9. Kanbur, Baris Burak & Xiang, Liming & Dubey, Swapnil & Choo, Fook Hoong & Duan, Fei, 2018. "Finite sum based thermoeconomic and sustainable analyses of the small scale LNG cold utilized power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 944-961.
    10. Shokati, Naser & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 527-542.
    11. Moein Shamoushaki & Giampaolo Manfrida & Lorenzo Talluri & Pouriya H. Niknam & Daniele Fiaschi, 2021. "Different Geothermal Power Cycle Configurations Cost Estimation Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Habibi, Hamed & Chitsaz, Ata & Javaherdeh, Koroush & Zoghi, Mohammad & Ayazpour, Mojtaba, 2018. "Thermo-economic analysis and optimization of a solar-driven ammonia-water regenerative Rankine cycle and LNG cold energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 147-160.
    13. Nemati, Arash & Nami, Hossein & Yari, Mortaza, 2018. "Assessment of different configurations of solar energy driven organic flash cycles (OFCs) via exergy and exergoeconomic methodologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1231-1248.
    14. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    15. Kanbur, Baris Burak & Xiang, Liming & Dubey, Swapnil & Choo, Fook Hoong & Duan, Fei, 2017. "Thermoeconomic and environmental assessments of a combined cycle for the small scale LNG cold utilization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1148-1162.
    16. Cao, Yan & Dhahad, Hayder A. & Hussen, Hasanen M. & Anqi, Ali E. & Farouk, Naeim & Issakhov, Alibek, 2022. "Development and tri-objective optimization of a novel biomass to power and hydrogen plant: A comparison of fueling with biomass gasification or biomass digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    17. Najjar, Yousef S.H. & Abubaker, Ahmad M., 2017. "Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of a novel inlet air cooling system with gas turbine engines using cascaded waste-heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 421-434.
    18. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng & Cao, Liyan & Wang, Yu, 2016. "Comprehensive analysis and parametric optimization of a CCP (combined cooling and power) system driven by geothermal source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 470-487.
    19. Liu, Xianglong & Hu, Guang & Zeng, Zhi, 2022. "Potential of biomass processing using digester in arrangement with a Brayton cycle, a Kalina cycle, and a multi-effect desalination; thermodynamic/environmental/financial study and MOPSO-based optimiz," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    20. Mohammadkhani, Farzad & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "A comparative study on the ammonia–water based bottoming power cycles: The exergoeconomic viewpoint," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 425-434.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:310:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224029475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.