IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v216y2021ics0360544220324038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frequency-constrained multi-source power system scheduling against N-1 contingency and renewable uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Yin, Yue
  • Liu, Tianqi
  • Wu, Lei
  • He, Chuan
  • Liu, Yikui

Abstract

Security continues to be the most critical concern in power system operation, which is exceptionally important under low inertia and high uncertainty situations induced by an increasing penetration of renewable sources. This paper presents a transient frequency-constrained two-stage stochastic scheduling model to study the day-ahead operation of thermal-hydro-wind-demand response systems. Specifically, (i) limits on rate-of-change-of-frequency and maximum frequency derivation are introduced to provide sufficient governor reserve from multiple sources for guaranteeing dynamic frequency performance against N-1 contingency; (ii) The de-loaded mode of variable speed wind turbines is proposed for leveraging economics of system operation and security of dynamic frequency response; (iii) Virtual inertial constant of power systems with variable speed wind turbines is calculated to simulate performance of the virtual inertial control; (iv) Demand response is considered in the stochastic framework to mitigate the time delay of delivering virtual inertia. Multiple scenarios are generated via Monte Carlo method to simulate wind generation uncertainties. The proposed two-stage stochastic mixed-integer nonlinear programming model with binaries in both stages is solved via an improved generalized Benders decomposition, which takes about 40% less time than the standard generalized Benders decomposition. Several enhanced strategies are discussed to improve computational performance of the generalized Benders decomposition. Numerical simulations illustrate effectiveness of the proposed approach in coordinating multi-resource scheduling of power systems against N-1 contingencies and uncertainties with guaranteed frequency performance. Specifically, numerical results on the 6-bus system illustrate that: (i) The optimal wind generation penetration level of 40% could well balance the wind curtailments and the benefits of variable speed wind turbines for regulation provision; (ii) With 50% penetration of wind generation, doubling the capacity of demand response can reduce the amount of wind curtailment 50.42%, and decrease the transient frequency deviation to 0.25Hz.

Suggested Citation

  • Yin, Yue & Liu, Tianqi & Wu, Lei & He, Chuan & Liu, Yikui, 2021. "Frequency-constrained multi-source power system scheduling against N-1 contingency and renewable uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:216:y:2021:i:c:s0360544220324038
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220324038
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Kangping & Wang, Fei & Mi, Zengqiang & Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmoud & Duić, Neven & Wang, Tieqiang, 2019. "Capacity and output power estimation approach of individual behind-the-meter distributed photovoltaic system for demand response baseline estimation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Schulze, Tim & McKinnon, Ken, 2016. "The value of stochastic programming in day-ahead and intra-day generation unit commitment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 592-605.
    3. Gomes, I.L.R. & Pousinho, H.M.I. & Melício, R. & Mendes, V.M.F., 2017. "Stochastic coordination of joint wind and photovoltaic systems with energy storage in day-ahead market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 310-320.
    4. Behrangrad, Mahdi, 2015. "A review of demand side management business models in the electricity market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 270-283.
    5. Tajeddini, Mohammad Amin & Rahimi-Kian, Ashkan & Soroudi, Alireza, 2014. "Risk averse optimal operation of a virtual power plant using two stage stochastic programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 958-967.
    6. Can Li & Ignacio E. Grossmann, 2019. "A generalized Benders decomposition-based branch and cut algorithm for two-stage stochastic programs with nonconvex constraints and mixed-binary first and second stage variables," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 247-272, October.
    7. Jiang, Zhiqiang & Li, Rongbo & Li, Anqiang & Ji, Changming, 2018. "Runoff forecast uncertainty considered load adjustment model of cascade hydropower stations and its application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 693-708.
    8. Yin, Yue & Liu, Tianqi & He, Chuan, 2019. "Day-ahead stochastic coordinated scheduling for thermal-hydro-wind-photovoltaic systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    9. Jean-Paul Watson & David Woodruff, 2011. "Progressive hedging innovations for a class of stochastic mixed-integer resource allocation problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 355-370, November.
    10. Hemmati, Reza & Saboori, Hedayat & Saboori, Saeid, 2016. "Stochastic risk-averse coordinated scheduling of grid integrated energy storage units in transmission constrained wind-thermal systems within a conditional value-at-risk framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 762-775.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Zifeng & Guo, Litao & Yu, Samson S. & Zhang, Mingli & Ren, Yupeng & Zhang, Na & Li, Weidong, 2023. "An efficient full-response analytical model for probabilistic production simulation in fast frequency response reserve planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    2. Zhi, Zhang & Ming, Zhou & Bo, Yuan & Zun, Guo & Zhaoyuan, Wu & Gengyin, Li, 2023. "Multipath retrofit planning approach for coal-fired power plants in low-carbon power system transitions: Shanxi Province case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Zhang, Mingze & Li, Weidong & Yu, Samson Shenglong & Wen, Kerui & Muyeen, S.M., 2023. "Day-ahead optimization dispatch strategy for large-scale battery energy storage considering multiple regulation and prediction failures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. Wen, Jiaxin & Bu, Siqi & Li, Fangxing & Du, Pengwei, 2021. "Risk assessment and mitigation on area-level RoCoF for operational planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Tan, Jin & Wu, Qiuwei & Zhang, Menglin & Wei, Wei & Liu, Feng & Pan, Bo, 2021. "Chance-constrained energy and multi-type reserves scheduling exploiting flexibility from combined power and heat units and heat pumps," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Jia & Zeng, Peter Pingliang & Xing, Hao & Li, Yalou & Wu, Qiuwei, 2020. "Hierarchical duality-based planning of transmission networks coordinating active distribution network operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Lu, Xiaoxing & Li, Kangping & Xu, Hanchen & Wang, Fei & Zhou, Zhenyu & Zhang, Yagang, 2020. "Fundamentals and business model for resource aggregator of demand response in electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Xu, Jiuping & Liu, Tingting, 2020. "Technological paradigm-based approaches towards challenges and policy shifts for sustainable wind energy development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    4. Andrew Allman & Qi Zhang, 2021. "Branch-and-price for a class of nonconvex mixed-integer nonlinear programs," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 81(4), pages 861-880, December.
    5. Huang, Kangdi & Liu, Pan & Kim, Jong-Suk & Xu, Weifeng & Gong, Yu & Cheng, Qian & Zhou, Yong, 2023. "A model coupling current non-adjustable, coming adjustable and remaining stages for daily generation scheduling of a wind-solar-hydro complementary system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    6. Tian, Yuyu & Chang, Jianxia & Wang, Yimin & Wang, Xuebin & Zhao, Mingzhe & Meng, Xuejiao & Guo, Aijun, 2022. "A method of short-term risk and economic dispatch of the hydro-thermal-wind-PV hybrid system considering spinning reserve requirements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    7. Prajapati, Vijaykumar K. & Mahajan, Vasundhara, 2021. "Reliability assessment and congestion management of power system with energy storage system and uncertain renewable resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    8. Crespo-Vazquez, Jose L. & Carrillo, C. & Diaz-Dorado, E. & Martinez-Lorenzo, Jose A. & Noor-E-Alam, Md., 2018. "A machine learning based stochastic optimization framework for a wind and storage power plant participating in energy pool market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 341-357.
    9. Esmaeil Ahmadi & Younes Noorollahi & Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo & Amjad Anvari-Moghaddam, 2020. "Stochastic Operation of a Solar-Powered Smart Home: Capturing Thermal Load Uncertainties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Turk, Ana & Wu, Qiuwei & Zhang, Menglin & Østergaard, Jacob, 2020. "Day-ahead stochastic scheduling of integrated multi-energy system for flexibility synergy and uncertainty balancing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    11. Wei Li & Hui Ren & Ping Chen & Yanyang Wang & Hailong Qi, 2020. "Key Operational Issues on the Integration of Large-Scale Solar Power Generation—A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    12. Schulze, Tim & Grothey, Andreas & McKinnon, Ken, 2017. "A stabilised scenario decomposition algorithm applied to stochastic unit commitment problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 247-259.
    13. Cheng, Meng & Sami, Saif Sabah & Wu, Jianzhong, 2017. "Benefits of using virtual energy storage system for power system frequency response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 376-385.
    14. Christos N. Dimitriadis & Evangelos G. Tsimopoulos & Michael C. Georgiadis, 2021. "A Review on the Complementarity Modelling in Competitive Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    15. Mostafa Esmaeili Shayan & Gholamhassan Najafi & Barat Ghobadian & Shiva Gorjian & Mohamed Mazlan & Mehdi Samami & Alireza Shabanzadeh, 2022. "Flexible Photovoltaic System on Non-Conventional Surfaces: A Techno-Economic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    16. Lee, Jinkyu & Bae, Sanghyeon & Kim, Woo Chang & Lee, Yongjae, 2023. "Value function gradient learning for large-scale multistage stochastic programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 321-335.
    17. Meyabadi, A. Fattahi & Deihimi, M.H., 2017. "A review of demand-side management: Reconsidering theoretical framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 367-379.
    18. Yıldıran, Uğur & Kayahan, İsmail, 2018. "Risk-averse stochastic model predictive control-based real-time operation method for a wind energy generation system supported by a pumped hydro storage unit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 631-643.
    19. Abdul Conteh & Mohammed Elsayed Lotfy & Kiptoo Mark Kipngetich & Tomonobu Senjyu & Paras Mandal & Shantanu Chakraborty, 2019. "An Economic Analysis of Demand Side Management Considering Interruptible Load and Renewable Energy Integration: A Case Study of Freetown Sierra Leone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Wu, Dexiang & Wu, Desheng Dash, 2020. "A decision support approach for two-stage multi-objective index tracking using improved lagrangian decomposition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:216:y:2021:i:c:s0360544220324038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.