IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v194y2020ics0360544219325770.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical proxy modeling for life cycle assessment and energetic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Masnadi, Mohammad S.
  • Perrier, Patrick R.
  • Wang, Jingfan
  • Rutherford, Jeff
  • Brandt, Adam R.

Abstract

Bottom-up life-cycle assessment (LCA) based on engineering-based models is emerging as a way to model the energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from important segments of the energy sector. However, a major challenge that has hindered further application of this approach is data and computationally intensive thermodynamic modeling. In order to address this issue, we introduce a general data-driven framework to develop statistical reduced-order models (henceforth “proxy models”) from advanced thermodynamic or engineering simulations that can be utilized for bottom-up LCA and/or energetic assessment purposes of any energy system. To demonstrate the performance of the proposed framework, we simulate four important oil and gas process units with a commercial process simulation package. Using a combination of deterministic and random sampling strategy, >25,000 simulations are performed and quadratic proxy models are trained on the results to predict the energy consumption and product compositions across a wide ranges of independent variables. The simple proxy models have excellent predictive accuracy (R2 > 0.95 in most cases, R2 = 1 for pump power consumption prediction), solve nearly instantaneously, and require fewer input parameters (less than 10, varies based on the process unit). We also examine and prove the proposed methodology stability across training and validation datasets via 1,000 independent data splitting runs. We lastly implement the oil and gas proxy models in a LCA simulator, compare the results with textbook correlations, and demonstrate the improved flexibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Masnadi, Mohammad S. & Perrier, Patrick R. & Wang, Jingfan & Rutherford, Jeff & Brandt, Adam R., 2020. "Statistical proxy modeling for life cycle assessment and energetic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:194:y:2020:i:c:s0360544219325770
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219325770
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathan Gagnon & Charles A.S. Hall & Lysle Brinker, 2009. "A Preliminary Investigation of Energy Return on Energy Investment for Global Oil and Gas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Lopez, Gartzen & Artetxe, Maite & Amutio, Maider & Bilbao, Javier & Olazar, Martin, 2017. "Thermochemical routes for the valorization of waste polyolefinic plastics to produce fuels and chemicals. A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 346-368.
    3. Mohammad S. Masnadi & Adam R. Brandt, 2017. "Climate impacts of oil extraction increase significantly with oilfield age," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 551-556, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Chen & Gu, Baihe & Chen, Yingchao & Tan, Xianchun & Feng, Lianyong, 2019. "Energy return on energy, carbon, and water investment in oil and gas resource extraction: Methods and applications to the Daqing and Shengli oilfields," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Huang, Jijiang & Veksha, Andrei & Chan, Wei Ping & Giannis, Apostolos & Lisak, Grzegorz, 2022. "Chemical recycling of plastic waste for sustainable material management: A prospective review on catalysts and processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Jonathan Dumas & Antoine Dubois & Paolo Thiran & Pierre Jacques & Francesco Contino & Bertrand Cornélusse & Gauthier Limpens, 2022. "The Energy Return on Investment of Whole-Energy Systems: Application to Belgium," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 1-34, December.
    4. Chhabra, Vibhuti & Bambery, Keith & Bhattacharya, Sankar & Shastri, Yogendra, 2020. "Thermal and in situ infrared analysis to characterise the slow pyrolysis of mixed municipal solid waste (MSW) and its components," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 388-401.
    5. Coughlin, Katie, 2012. "A mathematical analysis of full fuel cycle energy use," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 698-708.
    6. Ye, Lian & Zhang, Jianliang & Wang, Guangwei & Wang, Chen & Mao, Xiaoming & Ning, Xiaojun & Zhang, Nan & Teng, Haipeng & Li, Jinhua & Wang, Chuan, 2023. "Feasibility analysis of plastic and biomass hydrochar for blast furnace injection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    7. Pezzey, John C.V. & Burke, Paul J., 2014. "Towards a more inclusive and precautionary indicator of global sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 141-154.
    8. Danfeng Zhang & Xin Wang & Liang Zhao & Huaqing Xie & Chen Guo & Feizhou Qian & Hui Dong & Yun Hu, 2023. "Numerical Investigation on Heat Transfer and Flow Resistance Characteristics of Superheater in Hydrocracking Heat Recovery Steam Generator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Murphy, David J. & Hall, Charles A.S., 2011. "Adjusting the economy to the new energy realities of the second half of the age of oil," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 67-71.
    10. Jon Freise, 2011. "The EROI of Conventional Canadian Natural Gas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(11), pages 1-25, November.
    11. Lina I. Brand-Correa & Paul E. Brockway & Claire L. Copeland & Timothy J. Foxon & Anne Owen & Peter G. Taylor, 2017. "Developing an Input-Output Based Method to Estimate a National-Level Energy Return on Investment (EROI)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Arodudu, Oludunsin Tunrayo & Helming, Katharina & Voinov, Alexey & Wiggering, Hubert, 2017. "Integrating agronomic factors into energy efficiency assessment of agro-bioenergy production – A case study of ethanol and biogas production from maize feedstock," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 426-439.
    13. Anna Matuszewska & Adam Hańderek & Maciej Paczuski & Krzysztof Biernat, 2021. "Hydrocarbon Fractions from Thermolysis of Waste Plastics as Components of Engine Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Heun, Matthew Kuperus & de Wit, Martin, 2012. "Energy return on (energy) invested (EROI), oil prices, and energy transitions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 147-158.
    15. Lovelace, R. & Beck, S.B.M. & Watson, M. & Wild, A., 2011. "Assessing the energy implications of replacing car trips with bicycle trips in Sheffield, UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 2075-2087, April.
    16. González-López, Rafael & Giampietro, Mario, 2018. "Relational analysis of the oil and gas sector of Mexico: Implications for Mexico's energy reform," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 403-414.
    17. Renaud Coulomb & Fanny Henriet & Léo Reitzmann, 2021. "'Bad' Oil, 'Worse' Oil and Carbon Misallocation," Working Papers halshs-03244647, HAL.
    18. Elise Dupont & Marc Germain & Hervé Jeanmart, 2021. "Estimate of the Societal Energy Return on Investment (EROI)," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Marco Vittorio Ecclesia & João Santos & Paul E. Brockway & Tiago Domingos, 2022. "A Comprehensive Societal Energy Return on Investment Study of Portugal Reveals a Low but Stable Value," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    20. Wan Mahari, Wan Adibah & Chong, Cheng Tung & Cheng, Chin Kui & Lee, Chern Leing & Hendrata, Kristian & Yuh Yek, Peter Nai & Ma, Nyuk Ling & Lam, Su Shiung, 2018. "Production of value-added liquid fuel via microwave co-pyrolysis of used frying oil and plastic waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 309-317.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:194:y:2020:i:c:s0360544219325770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.