IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v123y2017icp77-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life cycle assessment of high capacity molybdenum disulfide lithium-ion battery for electric vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Deng, Yelin
  • Li, Jianyang
  • Li, Tonghui
  • Zhang, Jingyi
  • Yang, Fan
  • Yuan, Chris

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) on a potential next-generation lithium ion battery (LIB) with molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) anode and Nickel-Cobalt-Manganese oxide (NMC) cathode. The NMC-MoS2 battery is configured with 49.4 kWh capacity enabling a 320 km driving range for a mid-sized EV. In this study, the MoS2 anode synthesis is modeled based on our lab-scale experimentation and the battery design is based on the electrochemical parameters obtained from our lab results. The life cycle impact assessment is conducted using the ReCiPe method. The freshwater ecotoxicity impact is assessed through the modified USEtox™ method, based on the characterization factor of the CNT (carbon nanotubes) is derived. The obtained impact results of the NMC-MoS2 battery are benchmarked with those of a conventional NMC-Graphite battery under the same driving distance per charge. The results show that the NMC-MoS2 battery has higher environmental impacts in most impact categories compared to a conventional NMC-Graphite battery. Impacts on global warming potential and fossil depletion potential are 6%–7% higher while impacts in freshwater ecotoxicity, freshwater eutrophication, human toxicity, marine toxicity, marine eutrophication and terrestrial ecotoxicity are 141%–271% higher. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is performed to investigate the robustness and reliability of the LCA results.

Suggested Citation

  • Deng, Yelin & Li, Jianyang & Li, Tonghui & Zhang, Jingyi & Yang, Fan & Yuan, Chris, 2017. "Life cycle assessment of high capacity molybdenum disulfide lithium-ion battery for electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 77-88.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:123:y:2017:i:c:p:77-88
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217301032
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Curran, Scott J. & Wagner, Robert M. & Graves, Ronald L. & Keller, Martin & Green, Johney B., 2014. "Well-to-wheel analysis of direct and indirect use of natural gas in passenger vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 194-203.
    2. Li, Mengyu & Zhang, Xiongwen & Li, Guojun, 2016. "A comparative assessment of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles using a well-to-wheel analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 693-704.
    3. Franke, Thomas & Krems, Josef F., 2013. "What drives range preferences in electric vehicle users?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 56-62.
    4. Zhou, Boya & Wu, Ye & Zhou, Bin & Wang, Renjie & Ke, Wenwei & Zhang, Shaojun & Hao, Jiming, 2016. "Real-world performance of battery electric buses and their life-cycle benefits with respect to energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 603-613.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jani Das, 2022. "Comparative life cycle GHG emission analysis of conventional and electric vehicles in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 13294-13333, November.
    2. Jie Yang & Fu Gu & Jianfeng Guo & Bin Chen, 2019. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Mobile Power Banks with Lithium-Ion Battery and Lithium-Ion Polymer Battery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Wang, Mingyue & Huang, Ying & Wang, Ke & Zhu, Yade & Zhang, Na & Zhang, Hongming & Li, Suping & Feng, Zhenhe, 2018. "PVD synthesis of binder-free silicon and carbon coated 3D α-Fe2O3 nanorods hybrid films as high-capacity and long-life anode for flexible lithium-ion batteries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1021-1029.
    4. Felipe Cerdas & Paul Titscher & Nicolas Bognar & Richard Schmuch & Martin Winter & Arno Kwade & Christoph Herrmann, 2018. "Exploring the Effect of Increased Energy Density on the Environmental Impacts of Traction Batteries: A Comparison of Energy Optimized Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Sulfur Batteries for Mobility Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Christos S. Ioakimidis & Alberto Murillo-Marrodán & Ali Bagheri & Dimitrios Thomas & Konstantinos N. Genikomsakis, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of a Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) Electric Vehicle Battery in Second Life Application Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Yunfeng Jiang & Louis J. Shrinkle & Raymond A. de Callafon, 2019. "Autonomous Demand-Side Current Scheduling of Parallel Buck Regulated Battery Modules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Deidre Wolff & Lluc Canals Casals & Gabriela Benveniste & Cristina Corchero & Lluís Trilla, 2019. "The Effects of Lithium Sulfur Battery Ageing on Second-Life Possibilities and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Alexander Barke & Walter Cistjakov & Dominik Steckermeier & Christian Thies & Jan‐Linus Popien & Peter Michalowski & Sofia Pinheiro Melo & Felipe Cerdas & Christoph Herrmann & Ulrike Krewer & Arno Kwa, 2023. "Green batteries for clean skies: Sustainability assessment of lithium‐sulfur all‐solid‐state batteries for electric aircraft," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 795-810, June.
    9. Maryori C. Díaz-Ramírez & Victor J. Ferreira & Tatiana García-Armingol & Ana M. López-Sabirón & Germán Ferreira, 2020. "Battery Manufacturing Resource Assessment to Minimise Component Production Environmental Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Xingxing Wang & Peilin Ye & Shengren Liu & Yu Zhu & Yelin Deng & Yinnan Yuan & Hongjun Ni, 2023. "Research Progress of Battery Life Prediction Methods Based on Physical Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Federico Rossi & Maria Laura Parisi & Sarah Greven & Riccardo Basosi & Adalgisa Sinicropi, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Classic and Innovative Batteries for Solar Home Systems in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, July.
    12. Song, Ziyou & Zhang, Xiaobin & Li, Jianqiu & Hofmann, Heath & Ouyang, Minggao & Du, Jiuyu, 2018. "Component sizing optimization of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles with the hybrid energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 393-403.
    13. Song, Ziyou & Hou, Jun & Xu, Shaobing & Ouyang, Minggao & Li, Jianqiu, 2017. "The influence of driving cycle characteristics on the integrated optimization of hybrid energy storage system for electric city buses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 91-100.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiong, Siqin & Yuan, Yi & Yao, Jia & Bai, Bo & Ma, Xiaoming, 2023. "Exploring consumer preferences for electric vehicles based on the random coefficient logit model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    2. Zhang, Shaojun & Wu, Ye & Un, Puikei & Fu, Lixin & Hao, Jiming, 2016. "Modeling real-world fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions with high resolution for light-duty passenger vehicles in a traffic populated city," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 461-471.
    3. Ramos-Real, Francisco J. & Ramírez-Díaz, Alfredo & Marrero, Gustavo A. & Perez, Yannick, 2018. "Willingness to pay for electric vehicles in island regions: The case of Tenerife (Canary Islands)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 140-149.
    4. Yuan, Zhiyi & Ou, Xunmin & Peng, Tianduo & Yan, Xiaoyu, 2019. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of multi-pathways natural gas vehicles in china considering methane leakage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Bossink, Bart A.G., 2017. "Demonstrating sustainable energy: A review based model of sustainable energy demonstration projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1349-1362.
    6. Ruffini, Eleonora & Wei, Max, 2018. "Future costs of fuel cell electric vehicles in California using a learning rate approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 329-341.
    7. Nenming Wang & Guwen Tang, 2022. "A Review on Environmental Efficiency Evaluation of New Energy Vehicles Using Life Cycle Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-35, March.
    8. Boya Zhou & Shaojun Zhang & Ye Wu & Wenwei Ke & Xiaoyi He & Jiming Hao, 2018. "Energy-saving benefits from plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: perspectives based on real-world measurements," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 735-756, June.
    9. Hegazy, Omar & Barrero, Ricardo & Van den Bossche, Peter & El Baghdadi, Mohamed & Smekens, Jelle & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Vriens, Wouter & Bogaerts, Bruno, 2016. "Modeling, analysis and feasibility study of new drivetrain architectures for off-highway vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1056-1074.
    10. Chun Yang & Jui-Che Tu & Qianling Jiang, 2020. "The Influential Factors of Consumers’ Sustainable Consumption: A Case on Electric Vehicles in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Li, Wei & Jia, Zhijie & Zhang, Hongzhi, 2017. "The impact of electric vehicles and CCS in the context of emission trading scheme in China: A CGE-based analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 800-816.
    12. Yuan, Xinmei & Zhang, Chuanpu & Hong, Guokai & Huang, Xueqi & Li, Lili, 2017. "Method for evaluating the real-world driving energy consumptions of electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1955-1968.
    13. Li, Jiaxuan & Zhu, Xun & Djilali, Ned & Yang, Yang & Ye, Dingding & Chen, Rong & Liao, Qiang, 2022. "Comparative well-to-pump assessment of fueling pathways for zero-carbon transportation in China: Hydrogen economy or methanol economy?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    14. Vítor JPD Martinho, 2018. "A transversal perspective on global energy production and consumption: An approach based on convergence theory," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(4), pages 556-575, June.
    15. Byun, Hyunsuk & Shin, Jungwoo & Lee, Chul-Yong, 2018. "Using a discrete choice experiment to predict the penetration possibility of environmentally friendly vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 312-321.
    16. Dominik Franjo Dominković & Greg Stark & Bri-Mathias Hodge & Allan Schrøder Pedersen, 2018. "Integrated Energy Planning with a High Share of Variable Renewable Energy Sources for a Caribbean Island," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Ren, Lei & Zhou, Sheng & Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin, 2022. "Greenhouse gas life cycle analysis of China's fuel cell medium- and heavy-duty trucks under segmented usage scenarios and vehicle types," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    18. Ina Richter & Tobias Haas, 2020. "Greening the Car? Conflict Dynamics within the German Platform for Electric Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    19. He, Yi & Liu, Zhaocai & Song, Ziqi, 2020. "Optimal charging scheduling and management for a fast-charging battery electric bus system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    20. Bunce, Louise & Harris, Margaret & Burgess, Mark, 2014. "Charge up then charge out? Drivers’ perceptions and experiences of electric vehicles in the UK," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 278-287.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:123:y:2017:i:c:p:77-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.