Author
Listed:
- Han, Jian
- Zhou, Ying
- Weng, Yuyan
- Huang, Junling
Abstract
China's sustainable development pricing settlement mechanism provides a risk-hedging tool for renewable energy market entry. However, this mechanism excludes benefits from other medium and long-term contracts and green certificates. This will create issues regarding the choice of how renewable energy enters the market. Therefore, analysis the effect of mechanism volume and price to the market participation behavior and the benefit of renewable energy is key to policy refinement. To this end, this paper constructs an agent-based multi-strategy evolutionary game model to examine the strategic evolutionary trends of renewable energy entities under varying mechanism scale constraints. The study also investigates their impacts on entity revenues and the scale of mechanism electricity subsidies. Analytical results reveal that: sufficient mechanism electricity safeguards renewable energy revenues but may escalate subsidy pressure incrementally each year; while reducing mechanism electricity alleviate subsidy pressure, they also lower contract prices for successful bidders, making the exit mechanism or high bidding strategy a more appealing choice for renewables. The study recommends that to boost the growth of renewable energy capacity, sufficient mechanism-based electricity volume should be guaranteed. As renewable energy expands in the future, efforts should be made to gradually reducing mechanism electricity in the future. Policymakers should optimize the formation mechanism for local mechanism electricity price cap and floors to align with electricity market signals, thereby ensuring the basic returns and orderly development of renewable energy.
Suggested Citation
Han, Jian & Zhou, Ying & Weng, Yuyan & Huang, Junling, 2026.
"Research on the participation behavior of renewable energy in China's sustainable development price settlement mechanism: An agent-based simulation analysis,"
Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:enepol:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s030142152500549x
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.115042
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s030142152500549x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.