IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v202y2025ics030142152500093x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public perceptions of finance options for retrofit shared-loop ground source heat pumps

Author

Listed:
  • Morland, Kate V.
  • Fylan, Fiona

Abstract

Heat pumps are a key part of the UK Government's decarbonisation strategy to achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050. Shared-loop ground source heat pumps (GSHPs) offer domestic space and hot water heating at scale in medium-to-high-density areas where standard single-dwelling heat pumps are unsuitable. However, it is unclear whether homeowners would be willing to pay for them. This paper explores public perceptions of three shared-loop GSHP financing models. We used focus groups to understand homeowners' responses to each finance model, refined the models, and tested them in an online survey of UK homeowners. We found that while there is potential interest in joining a shared-loop GSHP network, there was distrust because the financial offers were perceived as unfair, disadvantaging some customers, and not offering long-term financial savings compared with a gas boiler. The standing charge for the shared loop was a major barrier. There was a preference for the shared-loop GSHP to be offered by a utility company, a need for personalised financial projections, and the option to delay joining. Our results suggest that to increase uptake, greater certainty around future decarbonisation incentivisation strategies is needed, along with regulation of financial models.

Suggested Citation

  • Morland, Kate V. & Fylan, Fiona, 2025. "Public perceptions of finance options for retrofit shared-loop ground source heat pumps," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:202:y:2025:i:c:s030142152500093x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142152500093X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114586?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:202:y:2025:i:c:s030142152500093x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.