IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v148y2025ics0140988325003482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of artificial intelligence policy on green innovation of firms

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Boqiang
  • Zhu, Yitong

Abstract

As a pivotal force in driving innovation, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has played a significant role in the technological advancement of enterprises. Investigating the impact of AI pilot policies on corporate green innovation is not only conducive to optimizing the development trajectory of AI but also an essential measure in advancing sustainable development strategies. This study uses the 2019 Chinese AI Innovation and Development Pilot Zone (AIP) policy as a quasi-natural experiment, examining the influence of policy on corporate green innovation and its intrinsic mechanisms of action. The findings indicate: (1) The AIP policy significantly fosters green innovation among enterprises in the pilot regions, with results remaining robust after a series of sensitivity tests; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals that the influence of the policy on corporate green innovation is mediated by R&D investment and is also moderated by the level of ESG and environmental disclosure; (3) Heterogeneity tests discover that the policy has a more pronounced impact on enterprises with superior financing conditions, lower market concentration, and higher levels of regional digital economic development. This paper not only provides theoretical support for understanding the role of AI in corporate green development but also offers empirical references for assessing the policy effects of AI development.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Boqiang & Zhu, Yitong, 2025. "The impact of artificial intelligence policy on green innovation of firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:148:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325003482
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325003482
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108524?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:148:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325003482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.