IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v131y2024ics0140988324000872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inverse product differentiation logit model: Holy grail or not?

Author

Listed:
  • Huo, Jinghai
  • Dua, Rubal
  • Bansal, Prateek

Abstract

Random coefficient logit (RCL) is the workhorse model to estimate demand elasticities in markets with differentiated products using aggregated sales data. While the ability to represent flexible substitution patterns makes RCL preferable, its estimation is computationally challenging due to the numerical inversion of the demand function. The recently proposed inverse product differentiation logit (IPDL) addresses this computational issue by directly specifying the inverse demand function. In addition to computational gains, IPDL claims to maintain flexibility through non-hierarchical product segmentation across multiple characteristics. Thus, IPDL is an attractive alternative to RCL in theory, but its potential remains unexplored in empirical studies. We present the first application of IPDL in understanding the demand for passenger cars in China using province-level sales data. Our results show that IPDL is around 300 times faster than RCL, can capture complementarity patterns that cannot be captured by RCL, can identify substitution patterns as well as RCL, and outperforms RCL in goodness of fit measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Huo, Jinghai & Dua, Rubal & Bansal, Prateek, 2024. "Inverse product differentiation logit model: Holy grail or not?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:131:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324000872
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324000872
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107379?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:131:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324000872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.