IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v129y2024ics0140988323007466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heavy industry regulations, hospitalization, and medical expenditures: Evidence from micro-level medical records in a northeast Chinese city

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Qinyun
  • Wang, Xuebin
  • Yan, Qianhui
  • Zhang, Lvqing

Abstract

Heavy industry regulations are expected to significantly contribute to enhancing public health and reducing social health costs. Based on microlevel medical records from a northeast Chinese city, we prove that environmental regulations targeting heavy industry plants significantly decrease hospitalization rates and medical expenditures. Specifically, the rate of hospitalization decreases by 0.165 per 10,000 population per day for respiratory, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, pulmonary, brain disease and adverse pregnancies, especially for those aged 0–15 years or older than 45 years. Our mechanistic analysis highlights that the reduction in hospitalization rates is attributed to the decreased concentrations of SO2 and NOx. Further analysis shows that heavy industry regulations lead to a reduction of 100,000 CNY in total medical expenditures within a span of 15 days for each plant. However, the benefits in medical costs remain significantly lower than the economic costs incurred by the policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Qinyun & Wang, Xuebin & Yan, Qianhui & Zhang, Lvqing, 2024. "Heavy industry regulations, hospitalization, and medical expenditures: Evidence from micro-level medical records in a northeast Chinese city," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323007466
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988323007466
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107248?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323007466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.