IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v317y2024i1p60-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Logistics sourcing of e-commerce firms considering promised delivery time and environmental sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Gong, Canran
  • Song, Huaming
  • Chen, Daqiang
  • Day, Steven James
  • Ignatius, Joshua

Abstract

Online consumers prioritise swift and dependable deliveries but are also concerned about the environmental repercussions of e-commerce, such as carbon emissions and packaging waste. E-commerce firms, therefore, grapple with balancing short promised delivery times (PDT) and environmental sustainability in a competitive landscape. Through a game-theoretic lens, this study delves into the logistics choices of two rival e-commerce firms. These firms can either manage their own logistics or outsource to third-party logistics providers (TPLs) that have a green edge due to advanced eco-friendly technologies. Our findings reveal that if the e-commerce firms compete on demand, their logistics strategies depend on the TPLs’ levels of green technology readiness. Conversely, intense PDT competition can diminish the TPLs’ benefits, prompting e-commerce firms to handle logistics in-house. Regarding environmental sustainability, the outcomes depend on whether demand or PDT competition drives the firms’ choices. Notably, if both firms compete on PDT, the most sustainable outcome remains elusive. Our conclusions remain consistent even when tested further by model extensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gong, Canran & Song, Huaming & Chen, Daqiang & Day, Steven James & Ignatius, Joshua, 2024. "Logistics sourcing of e-commerce firms considering promised delivery time and environmental sustainability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 60-75.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:317:y:2024:i:1:p:60-75
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.02.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724001346
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.02.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:317:y:2024:i:1:p:60-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.