IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v218y2012i1p86-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Control methods for dynamic time-based manufacturing under customized product lead times

Author

Listed:
  • Weng, Wei
  • Fujimura, Shigeru

Abstract

For manufacturers, the integration of high performance manufacturing with customer-oriented practices plays an important role in improving the performance of their business system. The benefits from such integration can only be maximized when the two parts are designed to work cooperatively. Though previous research has contributed much to manufacturing control algorithms and customer service practices, there has been little consideration of the two parts as a whole; consequently, the methods proposed may not be well supported by the other practices adopted in the system. This study develops production control methods that support a customer-oriented lead time policy, and aims to increase the performance of both manufacturing and customer service. The control methods are proposed for hybrid flow shops handling orders arriving dynamically. Computer simulations are conducted on a large number of problem instances, and the results show that the designed distributed feedback and decision-making functions enable the proposed methods to significantly outperform existing methods in achieving just-in-time (JIT) job completion under customized product lead times. Even taking into account the possible tradeoff between JIT job completion and flow time length, the proposed methods still deliver competitive performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Weng, Wei & Fujimura, Shigeru, 2012. "Control methods for dynamic time-based manufacturing under customized product lead times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 86-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:218:y:2012:i:1:p:86-96
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221711009337
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Slater, Stanley F. & Narver, John C., 2000. "The Positive Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability: A Balanced Replication," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 69-73, April.
    2. Ruiz, Rubén & Vázquez-Rodríguez, José Antonio, 2010. "The hybrid flow shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Oguz, C. & Fikret Ercan, M. & Edwin Cheng, T. C. & Fung, Y. F., 2003. "Heuristic algorithms for multiprocessor task scheduling in a two-stage hybrid flow-shop," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(2), pages 390-403, September.
    4. Kyparisis, George J. & Koulamas, Christos, 2006. "Flexible flow shop scheduling with uniform parallel machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(3), pages 985-997, February.
    5. Moursli, O. & Pochet, Y., 2000. "A branch-and-bound algorithm for the hybrid flowshop," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 113-125, March.
    6. Kis, Tamas & Pesch, Erwin, 2005. "A review of exact solution methods for the non-preemptive multiprocessor flowshop problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(3), pages 592-608, August.
    7. Allahverdi, Ali & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2008. "A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 985-1032, June.
    8. Kurz, Mary E. & Askin, Ronald G., 2004. "Scheduling flexible flow lines with sequence-dependent setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(1), pages 66-82, November.
    9. Agnetis, A. & Pacifici, A. & Rossi, F. & Lucertini, M. & Nicoletti, S. & Nicolo, F. & Oriolo, G. & Pacciarelli, D. & Pesaro, E., 1997. "Scheduling of flexible flow lines in an automobile assembly plant," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 348-362, March.
    10. Mark L. Spearman & Rachel Q. Zhang, 1999. "Optimal Lead Time Policies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 290-295, February.
    11. Nahm, Abraham Y. & Vonderembse, Mark A. & Subba Rao, S. & Ragu-Nathan, T.S., 2006. "Time-based manufacturing improves business performance--results from a survey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 213-229, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rossi, Tommaso & Pozzi, Rossella & Testa, Mariapaola, 2017. "EOQ-based inventory management in single-machine multi-item systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 106-113.
    2. Sagawa, Juliana Keiko & Nagano, Marcelo Seido, 2015. "Modeling the dynamics of a multi-product manufacturing system: A real case application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 624-636.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruiz, Rubén & Vázquez-Rodríguez, José Antonio, 2010. "The hybrid flow shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Quadt, Daniel & Kuhn, Heinrich, 2007. "A taxonomy of flexible flow line scheduling procedures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(3), pages 686-698, May.
    3. Urlings, Thijs & Ruiz, Rubén & Stützle, Thomas, 2010. "Shifting representation search for hybrid flexible flowline problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 1086-1095, December.
    4. Bozorgirad, Mir Abbas & Logendran, Rasaratnam, 2013. "Bi-criteria group scheduling in hybrid flowshops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 599-612.
    5. Figielska, Ewa, 2014. "A heuristic for scheduling in a two-stage hybrid flowshop with renewable resources shared among the stages," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 433-444.
    6. Rossit, Daniel Alejandro & Tohmé, Fernando & Frutos, Mariano, 2018. "The Non-Permutation Flow-Shop scheduling problem: A literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 143-153.
    7. Pan, Quan-Ke & Gao, Liang & Li, Xin-Yu & Gao, Kai-Zhou, 2017. "Effective metaheuristics for scheduling a hybrid flowshop with sequence-dependent setup times," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 303(C), pages 89-112.
    8. Jin Xu & Natarajan Gautam, 2020. "On competitive analysis for polling systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(6), pages 404-419, September.
    9. Fátima Pilar & Eliana Costa e Silva & Ana Borges, 2023. "Optimizing Vehicle Repairs Scheduling Using Mixed Integer Linear Programming: A Case Study in the Portuguese Automobile Sector," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Berghman, Lotte & Leus, Roel, 2015. "Practical solutions for a dock assignment problem with trailer transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 787-799.
    11. S. M. Mousavi & I. Mahdavi & J. Rezaeian & M. Zandieh, 2018. "An efficient bi-objective algorithm to solve re-entrant hybrid flow shop scheduling with learning effect and setup times," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 123-158, April.
    12. Chou, Fuh-Der, 2013. "Particle swarm optimization with cocktail decoding method for hybrid flow shop scheduling problems with multiprocessor tasks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 137-145.
    13. Mingxing Li & Ray Y. Zhong & Ting Qu & George Q. Huang, 2022. "Spatial–temporal out-of-order execution for advanced planning and scheduling in cyber-physical factories," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1355-1372, June.
    14. Khalil Tliba & Thierno M. L. Diallo & Olivia Penas & Romdhane Ben Khalifa & Noureddine Ben Yahia & Jean-Yves Choley, 2023. "Digital twin-driven dynamic scheduling of a hybrid flow shop," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 2281-2306, June.
    15. Luo, Hao & Du, Bing & Huang, George Q. & Chen, Huaping & Li, Xiaolin, 2013. "Hybrid flow shop scheduling considering machine electricity consumption cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 423-439.
    16. Gerstl, Enrique & Mosheiov, Gur, 2013. "A two-stage flow shop batch-scheduling problem with the option of using Not-All-Machines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 161-166.
    17. Fang Wang & Yunqing Rao & Chaoyong Zhang & Qiuhua Tang & Liping Zhang, 2016. "Estimation of Distribution Algorithm for Energy-Efficient Scheduling in Turning Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-20, August.
    18. R. Hansmann & T. Rieger & U. Zimmermann, 2014. "Flexible job shop scheduling with blockages," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 79(2), pages 135-161, April.
    19. Neufeld, Janis S. & Schulz, Sven & Buscher, Udo, 2023. "A systematic review of multi-objective hybrid flow shop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 1-23.
    20. Gheisariha, Elmira & Tavana, Madjid & Jolai, Fariborz & Rabiee, Meysam, 2021. "A simulation–optimization model for solving flexible flow shop scheduling problems with rework and transportation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 152-178.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:218:y:2012:i:1:p:86-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.