IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecosta/v35y2025icp71-83.html

An Automatic Portmanteau Test For Nonlinear Dependence

Author

Listed:
  • Grivas, Charisios

Abstract

A data-driven version of a portmanteau test for detecting nonlinear types of statistical dependence is considered. An attractive feature of the proposed test is that it properly controls the type I error without being sensitive with respect to the number of autocorrelations used. In addition, the automatic test is found to have higher power in simulations when compared to the standard portmanteau test, for both raw data and residuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Grivas, Charisios, 2025. "An Automatic Portmanteau Test For Nonlinear Dependence," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 71-83.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:35:y:2025:i:c:p:71-83
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosta.2022.12.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452306222001137
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Contains open access articles
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecosta.2022.12.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan Carlos Escanciano & Ignacio N. Lobato & Lin Zhu, 2013. "Automatic Specification Testing for Vector Autoregressions and Multivariate Nonlinear Time Series Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 426-437, October.
    2. Zacharias Psaradakis & Marián Vávra, 2019. "Portmanteau tests for linearity of stationary time series," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 248-262, February.
    3. Escanciano, J. Carlos & Lobato, Ignacio N., 2009. "An automatic Portmanteau test for serial correlation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 151(2), pages 140-149, August.
    4. Leeb, Hannes & Pötscher, Benedikt M., 2005. "Model Selection And Inference: Facts And Fiction," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 21-59, February.
    5. A. I. McLeod & W. K. Li, 1983. "Diagnostic Checking Arma Time Series Models Using Squared‐Residual Autocorrelations," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(4), pages 269-273, July.
    6. Lee, Tae-Hwy & White, Halbert & Granger, Clive W. J., 1993. "Testing for neglected nonlinearity in time series models : A comparison of neural network methods and alternative tests," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 269-290, April.
    7. Kuersteiner, Guido M., 2001. "Optimal instrumental variables estimation for ARMA models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 359-405, September.
    8. Simone Giannerini & Esfandiar Maasoumi & Estela Bee Dagum, 2015. "Entropy testing for nonlinear serial dependence in time series," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 102(3), pages 661-675.
    9. Ana Pérez & Esther Ruiz, 2003. "Properties of the Sample Autocorrelations of Nonlinear Transformations in Long-Memory Stochastic Volatility Models," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 420-444.
    10. J. Kreiss, 1991. "Estimation of the distribution function of noise in stationary processes," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 285-297, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zacharias Psaradakis & Marián Vávra, 2019. "Portmanteau tests for linearity of stationary time series," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 248-262, February.
    2. Marian Vavra, 2012. "Robustness of Power Properties of Non-linearity Tests," Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics and Finance 1205, Birkbeck, Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics.
    3. de Lima, Pedro J. F., 1997. "On the robustness of nonlinearity tests to moment condition failure," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1-2), pages 251-280.
    4. Chen, Yi-Ting & Chou, Ray Y. & Kuan, Chung-Ming, 2000. "Testing time reversibility without moment restrictions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 199-218, March.
    5. Harvey,Andrew C., 2013. "Dynamic Models for Volatility and Heavy Tails," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107034723, January.
    6. Alan G. Isaac & Vasudeva Ramaswamy, 2023. "Rule-based trading on an order-driven exchange: a reassessment," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(12), pages 1871-1886, November.
    7. Marian Vavra, 2016. "Testing the Validity of Assumptions of UC-ARIMA Models for Trend-Cycle Decompositions," Working and Discussion Papers WP 4/2016, Research Department, National Bank of Slovakia.
    8. Stan Hurn & Ralf Becker, 2009. "Testing for Nonlinearity in Mean in the Presence of Heteroskedasticity," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 311-326, September.
    9. Psaradakis Zacharias & Spagnolo Nicola, 2002. "Power Properties of Nonlinearity Tests for Time Series with Markov Regimes," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(3), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna, 2017. "Testing for Uncorrelated Residuals in Dynamic Count Models With an Application to Corporate Bankruptcy," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 349-358, July.
    11. Zhang, Guoqiang & Eddy Patuwo, B. & Y. Hu, Michael, 1998. "Forecasting with artificial neural networks:: The state of the art," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 35-62, March.
    12. Manfred M. Fischer & Wolfgang Koller, 2001. "Testing for Non-Linear Dependence in Univariate Time Series: An Empirical Investigation of the Austrian Unemployment Rate," ERSA conference papers ersa01p233, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Roberto Baragona & Francesco Battaglia & Domenico Cucina, 2024. "ARMA model checking with data-driven portmanteau tests," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 33(3), pages 925-942, July.
    14. Ke Zhu, 2016. "Bootstrapping the portmanteau tests in weak auto-regressive moving average models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(2), pages 463-485, March.
    15. Kilani Ghoudi & Bruno Rémillard, 2018. "Serial independence tests for innovations of conditional mean and variance models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(1), pages 3-26, March.
    16. Tae-Hwy Lee & Zhou Xi & Ru Zhang, 2013. "Testing for Neglected Nonlinearity Using Regularized Artificial Neural Networks," Working Papers 201422, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics, revised Apr 2012.
    17. Heravi, Saeed & Osborn, Denise R. & Birchenhall, C. R., 2004. "Linear versus neural network forecasts for European industrial production series," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 435-446.
    18. Claudiu Tiberiu Albulescu & Aviral Kumar Tiwari & Phouphet Kyophilavong, 2021. "Nonlinearities and Chaos: A New Analysis of CEE Stock Markets," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-13, March.
    19. Roberto Baragona & Francesco Battaglia & Domenico Cucina, 2024. "A simple portmanteau test with data-driven truncation point," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 733-749, April.
    20. Mirzaee Ghazani, Majid & Khalili Araghi, Mansour, 2014. "Evaluation of the adaptive market hypothesis as an evolutionary perspective on market efficiency: Evidence from the Tehran stock exchange," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 50-59.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C01 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Econometrics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:35:y:2025:i:c:p:71-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/econometrics-and-statistics .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.