IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v49y2021ics2212041621000231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nature’s contribution to people as a framework for examining socioecological systems: The case of pastoral systems

Author

Listed:
  • Dean, G.
  • Rivera-Ferre, M.G.
  • Rosas-Casals, Marti
  • Lopez-i-Gelats, F.

Abstract

The Nature’s Contribution to People (NCP) framework builds on the Ecosystem Services (ES) concept and aims to incorporate social sciences more inclusively into economic and ecological aspects of ES. Given the emphasis of NCP around social issues, it is our hypothesis that NCP framework is well positioned to analyse complex socio-ecological systems (SES) where human-nature interactions are heavily linked, such as pastoral systems. In this article, a qualitative comparative analysis was conducted to explore trends throughout the literature on pastoral systems and the viability of the NCP framework to analyse pastoral systems as a SES with strong human-nature interactions. We found that the NCP framework allows for an intuitive translation from ES. Our results show that the NCP Habitat creation and maintenance, Food and feed, and Supporting identities are the most connected to pastoral systems in the scientific literature. Given the emphasis of the NCP framework on non-material aspects of human-nature systems and the ease with which it can be applied to the literature, we suggest that the NCP framework can be complementary to the ES framework to allow for a more complete analysis of SES with strong human-nature connections.

Suggested Citation

  • Dean, G. & Rivera-Ferre, M.G. & Rosas-Casals, Marti & Lopez-i-Gelats, F., 2021. "Nature’s contribution to people as a framework for examining socioecological systems: The case of pastoral systems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:49:y:2021:i:c:s2212041621000231
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041621000231
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nadia Schoch & Bernd Steimann & Susan Thieme, 2010. "Migration and animal husbandry: Competing or complementary livelihood strategies. Evidence from Kyrgyzstan," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 34, pages 211-221, August.
    2. César J. Pérez & Carl A. Smith, 2019. "Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Conservation of Settled Territories in the Bolivian Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-41, November.
    3. Saverio Kr&aauml;tli & Nikolaus Schareika, 2010. "Living Off Uncertainty: The Intelligent Animal Production of Dryland Pastoralists," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 22(5), pages 605-622, December.
    4. R. Neudert & J. Etzold & F. M�nzner & M. Manthey & S. Busse, 2013. "The Opportunity Costs of Conserving Pasture Resources for Mobile Pastoralists in the Greater Caucasus," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 499-522, August.
    5. Nadia Schoch & Bernd Steimann & Susan Thieme, 2010. "Migration and animal husbandry: Competing or complementary livelihood strategies. Evidence from Kyrgyzstan," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 34(3), pages 211-221, August.
    6. Pires, Aliny P.F. & Padgurschi, Maíra C.G. & de Castro, Paula D. & Scarano, Fabio R. & Strassburg, Bernardo & Joly, Carlos A. & Watson, Robert T. & de Groot, Rudolf, 2020. "Ecosystem services or nature’s contributions? Reasons behind different interpretations in Latin America," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    7. Simoncini, Riccardo & Ring, Irene & Sandström, Camilla & Albert, Christian & Kasymov, Ulan & Arlettaz, Raphael, 2019. "Constraints and opportunities for mainstreaming biodiversity and ecosystem services in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy: Insights from the IPBES assessment for Europe and Central Asia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Layna Droz & Hsun-Mei Chen & Hung-Tao Chu & Rika Fajrini & Jerry Imbong & Romaric Jannel & Orika Komatsubara & Concordia Marie A. Lagasca-Hiloma & Chansatya Meas & Duy Hung Nguyen & Tshering Ongmu She, 2022. "Exploring the diversity of conceptualizations of nature in East and South-East Asia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Isabel Dinis & Orlando Simões, 2021. "Resilience in Retrospective: The Trajectory of Agro-Pastoral Systems in the Centro Region of Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-29, May.
    3. Teodoro Semeraro & Elisa Gatto & Riccardo Buccolieri & Valentina Catanzaro & Luigi De Bellis & Lorenzo Cotrozzi & Giacomo Lorenzini & Marzia Vergine & Andrea Luvisi, 2021. "How Ecosystem Services Can Strengthen the Regeneration Policies for Monumental Olive Groves Destroyed by Xylella fastidiosa Bacterium in a Peri-Urban Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Marini Govigli, V. & Bruzzese, S., 2023. "Assessing the emotional and spiritual dimension of forests: A review of existing participatory methods," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    5. Lecegui, Antonio & Olaizola, Ana María & López-i-Gelats, Feliu & Varela, Elsa, 2022. "Implementing the livelihood resilience framework: An indicator-based model for assessing mountain pastoral farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    6. Schirpke, Uta & Wang, Genxu & Padoa-Schioppa, Emilio, 2021. "Editorial: Mountain landscapes: Protected areas, ecosystem services, and future challenges," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azamat Azarov & Roy C. Sidle & Dietrich Darr & Vladimir Verner & Zbynek Polesny, 2024. "A Proposed Typology of Farming Systems for Assessing Sustainable Livelihood Development Pathways in the Tien Shan Mountains of Kyrgyzstan," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Azamat Azarov & Zbynek Polesny & Dietrich Darr & Maksim Kulikov & Vladimir Verner & Roy C. Sidle, 2022. "Classification of Mountain Silvopastoral Farming Systems in Walnut Forests of Kyrgyzstan: Determining Opportunities for Sustainable Livelihoods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Regret Sunge & Calvin Mudzingiri, 2023. "A Systematic Literature Review on Migration and Remittances in Mountainous Regions: Key Takeaways for Phuthaditjhaba, Free State, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Chaudhary, Ashok Kumar & Pandit, Ram & Burton, Michael, 2022. "Farmyard manure use and adoption of agricultural mechanization among smallholders in the Mahottari District, Nepal," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    5. Mack, Elizabeth A. & Sauls, Laura Aileen & Jokisch, Brad D. & Nolte, Kerstin & Schmook, Birgit & He, Yifan & Radel, Claudia & Allington, Ginger R.H. & Kelley, Lisa C. & Scott, Christian Kelly & Leisz,, 2023. "Remittances and land change: A systematic review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    6. Zhou, Hong & Yan, Jianzhong & Lei, Kun & Wu, Ya & Sun, Laixiang, 2020. "Labor migration and the decoupling of the crop-livestock system in a rural mountainous area: Evidence from Chongqing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Melindi-Ghidi, Paolo & Dedeurwaerdere, Tom & Fabbri, Giorgio, 2020. "Using environmental knowledge brokers to promote deep green agri-environment measures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    8. Mayer, Andreas & Kaufmann, Lisa & Kalt, Gerald & Matej, Sarah & Theurl, Michaela C. & Morais, Tiago G. & Leip, Adrian & Erb, Karl-Heinz, 2021. "Applying the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production framework to map provisioning ecosystem services and their relation to ecosystem functioning across the European Union," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    9. Behnke, Roy & Young, Helen & Sulieman, Hussein M. & Robinson, Sarah & Idris, Ammar E., 2020. "The seasonal imperative: Environmental drivers of livestock mobility in East Darfur, Sudan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Andrey Zaytsev, 2020. "Rental Income Structure in Economy as a Basis for Sustainable Agrarian Relations in the Agro-Industrial Complex," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Muradian, Roldan & Gómez-Baggethun, Erik, 2021. "Beyond ecosystem services and nature's contributions: Is it time to leave utilitarian environmentalism behind?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    12. Achmad Faqih & Roosganda Elizabeth & Delima Hasri Azahari, 2020. "The Increasing of Competitiveness of Agro-Industry Products Through Institutional Empowerment to Support the Achievement of Sustainable Agricultural Development," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 663-671.
    13. Pengyao Qin & Bin Sun & Zengyuan Li & Zhihai Gao & Yifu Li & Ziyu Yan & Ting Gao, 2021. "Estimation of Grassland Carrying Capacity by Applying High Spatiotemporal Remote Sensing Techniques in Zhenglan Banner, Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Syed Amir Manzoor & Geoffrey Griffiths & David Christian Rose & Martin Lukac, 2021. "The Return of Wooded Landscapes in Wales: An Exploration of Possible Post-Brexit Futures," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Ariell Ahearn, 2018. "Herders and hazards: covariate dzud risk and the cost of risk management strategies in a Mongolian subdistrict," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(1), pages 165-181, November.
    16. J. Marc Foggin, 2018. "Environmental Conservation in the Tibetan Plateau Region: Lessons for China’s Belt and Road Initiative in the Mountains of Central Asia," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-34, April.
    17. Rust, Niki A. & Rehackova, Lucia & Naab, Francis & Abrams, Amber & Hughes, Courtney & Merkle, Bethann Garramon & Clark, Beth & Tindale, Sophie, 2021. "What does the UK public want farmland to look like?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    18. Manes, Stella & Vale, Mariana M. & Malecha, Artur & Pires, Aliny P.F., 2022. "Nature-based solutions promote climate change adaptation safeguarding ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    19. Haensel, Maria & Scheinpflug, Luzie & Riebl, Rebekka & Lohse, Eva Julia & Röder, Norbert & Koellner, Thomas, 2023. "Policy instruments and their success in preserving temperate grassland: Evidence from 16 years of implementation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    20. Cai, Liping & Wang, Hui & Liu, Yanxu & Fan, Donglin & Li, Xiaoxiao, 2022. "Is potential cultivated land expanding or shrinking in the dryland of China? Spatiotemporal evaluation based on remote sensing and SVM," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:49:y:2021:i:c:s2212041621000231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.